My balance is now down to £500 after a few medium stakes loses over the weekend.
I just havent got the time, skill, patience or discipline to make money gambling.
I have 4k outstanding balance on my virgin credit card......and with this £500, want 1 final shot at making £3.5k profit to clear this card, then close down account and stop gambling.
sounds simple......but obviously wont be.
Ive lost big before, and wont lose sleep if this challenge fails and I lose the £500.
I'd like to, if possible, make this £3500 in around 4-5 weeks.........
I just am unsure weather to go for broke on 3 even money shots????
Its obvious you have no clue on how to making money, atleast you've admitted it.
Now you've had your begging bowl out hussling for scraps, and some people have even given you a 3 course meal, of which you tipped out as it didn't suit your taste at the time.
So in relation to Man U do tell me whch team in the EPL you feel will beat them.
Now betting is based on current form probabillity.
So on current form I can't see a single team beating Man U this years, they ar estreets ahead of their nearest team, They might be unlucky and get held to a draw 2-3 matches but with their current starting lineup they are unbeatable in the EPL. They rolled cjelsea easily and smashed Arsenal whos next liverpool?? man city?? man city would be the game I sat out of.
I'd rather plonk my bank on them to win draw no bet than lump your bank laying 40-1 outsiders on the horses as you were so keen to do.
Why don't you set aside 50 quid and all up it on Man U every EPL match and if you think a sode has their measure don't backem that week?????
now the soup kitchen opens shortly if that doesn't interest you???
Paulme I continually shake my head at you.Its obvious you have no clue on how to making money, atleast you've admitted it.Now you've had your begging bowl out hussling for scraps, and some people have even given you a 3 course meal, of which you tipp
hmm come back to me if they go all season unbeaten. also west brom were the only team to get a point at OT last season. now who would have singled them out .
MUG
hmm come back to me if they go all season unbeaten. also west brom were the only team to get a point at OT last season. now who would have singled them out .MUG
I'm not sure I'd exactly label Man U as unbeatable. Form can temporarily go out of the window without a warning Gold Coast, and you never know when even a really good team is going to throw in a shocking game.
I guess 1.21 as a Draw No Bet on them beating Stoke seems a fair price. But Stoke isn't an easy place to go, and you are assuming Man U have completely recovered from their problems on the road last year. They had a lot of very bad results away from OT last season, several of them quite hard to see coming.
And I wouldn't imagine you'd get very good odds on a Draw No Bet if they were at OT.
I'm not sure I'd exactly label Man U as unbeatable. Form can temporarily go out of the window without a warning Gold Coast, and you never know when even a really good team is going to throw in a shocking game. I guess 1.21 as a Draw No Bet on them be
No outcome is certain otherwise it wouldn't be on here. It;s all a question of probability. If a football team appear unbeatable their odds will be consequently short. The job of the successful gambler is to determine whether they are too short or too long and bet accordingly.
No outcome is certain otherwise it wouldn't be on here. It;s all a question of probability. If a football team appear unbeatable their odds will be consequently short. The job of the successful gambler is to determine whether they are too short or
Was Arsenal capable yes, but they got steam rolled 8-2
What about Chelsea? capable yes, but got dusted 3-1
I reckon if your disciplined enough and get don't get an unlucky break this dudes $500 bank could go sky high, discipline and a bit of luck.
Capable and able to are two different things,Was Arsenal capable yes, but they got steam rolled 8-2What about Chelsea? capable yes, but got dusted 3-1I reckon if your disciplined enough and get don't get an unlucky break this dudes $500 bank could go
he is the eternal pesimist, brought on by months of backing losers and has developed the you can't win mentality, He isn't smart enough to formulate a staking system or betting approach.
Nah was for Paulmehe is the eternal pesimist, brought on by months of backing losers and has developed the you can't win mentality, He isn't smart enough to formulate a staking system or betting approach.
GoldCoastinvestor 21 Sep 11 08:31 Ok by your own judgement Man U away are a bit of a liaillity, so Why not lump on them at home win draw no bet??
all depends on the price, if you are lumping on them at a short price you are doomed, terrible advice.
GoldCoastinvestor 21 Sep 11 08:31 Ok by your own judgement Man U away are a bit of a liaillity, so Why not lump on them at home win draw no bet??all depends on the price, if you are lumping on them at a short price you are doomed, terrible advic
barnsey there are no shortcuts to success, even if your going for broke strategy (or non strategy) came up trumps you would be intoxicated with the result leading to more bad decisions.
Making it a pay on here is Pure Drudgery and a Marathon not a Sprint!
barnsey there are no shortcuts to success, even if your going for broke strategy (or non strategy) came up trumps you would be intoxicated with the result leading to more bad decisions. Making it a pay on here is Pure Drudgery and a Marathon not a
See paulme, that is another example of your stupidity, your so drunk on losing you can't see a winner even it were gifted to you as many have been in the past.
Your a typical mug punter actually your worse than that your here day in day out begging for a winner or someone to give you a winning system. have you followe dup on that lay the draw system that seems to have merit if you'have discipline?? Nope why?? doesn't win big amounts only wins small amounts and thats not good enough for you is it, you want it all and you don't want to do any leg work for it, fact is punting wise, you'll never win, ever.
You could not win a raffle if you held every ticket
See paulme, that is another example of your stupidity, your so drunk on losing you can't see a winner even it were gifted to you as many have been in the past.Your a typical mug punter actually your worse than that your here day in day out begging fo
goldcoast your advice to paulme is to lump on Man Utd at home and then you are on the path to success. And then you have the cheek to call others stupid.
Your advice is prob some of the most naive I have seen on here. As was already put there is no shortcut to success. Unless you are backing value or laying value you have no chance to make it pay long term.
goldcoast your advice to paulme is to lump on Man Utd at home and then you are on the path to success. And then you have the cheek to call others stupid.Your advice is prob some of the most naive I have seen on here. As was already put there is no s
The fact that there are so many people on here clueless about value, even those offering advice (!), is the reason it is possible to make a good profit on here.
The fact that there are so many people on here clueless about value, even those offering advice (!), is the reason it is possible to make a good profit on here.
Ok so what is value on a Man U at home win draw no bet.
Give us some figures of value??
I could back a figure that was "value" but if it loses where is the value in that???
take a footy match 1 side is $1.15 the other $8 sure the $8 side is "value" but would you back it???
of course you wouldn't because it is most likely a Man U Vs WBC and even though 8s are good value youy might as well piss your money up the pub wall??
Ok so what is value on a Man U at home win draw no bet.Give us some figures of value??I could back a figure that was "value" but if it loses where is the value in that???take a footy match 1 side is $1.15 the other $8 sure the $8 side is "value" but
if I determine 8 is value then yes without a doubt I will back it. I am not concerned short term whether it wins or loses. I am only concerned with the bigger picture
if I determine 8 is value then yes without a doubt I will back it. I am not concerned short term whether it wins or loses. I am only concerned with the bigger picture
Barnsey, here's another draw no bet idea for you. Huddersfield have not lost for 34 league games. It's an extraordinary run, to put it into context it's the longest ever unbeaten run outside the top flight in 120 odd years of professional football. It's my view that week after week the market underestimates the extent to which this team is able to play 90 minutes without losing. I've done very well out of that so I'm sharing it with you. Despite being 32 then 33 games unbeaten, in both of their last 2 league games they started as underdogs. This week they're at home to Orient, who can be laid here now at 7.6. Orient have played 9 games this season and not won any of them. The reason I suggets draw no bet is because they have drawn a lot of games during their run. They are resilient, extremely well organised and they've forgotten how to lose. Any team that can leave a striker as talented and prolific as Jordan Rhodes on the bench as often as they do is clearly a superior force at this level. Of course eventually they'll lose some games, maybe even this week, but I'm of the view that following them consistently this season unless and until they suffer a horrendous run of injuries to their best players will continue to be profitable. Even if it's not as profitable as it has been so far during this run, there's a lot of margin for error, as so far there would have been 0 losing bets out of 34 if you'd got in at the very start.
Barnsey, here's another draw no bet idea for you. Huddersfield have not lost for 34 league games. It's an extraordinary run, to put it into context it's the longest ever unbeaten run outside the top flight in 120 odd years of professional football. I
Ok so what is value on a Man U at home win draw no bet.
Give us some figures of value??
I could back a figure that was "value" but if it loses where is the value in that???
take a footy match 1 side is $1.15 the other $8 sure the $8 side is "value" but would you back it???
of course you wouldn't because it is most likely a Man U Vs WBC and even though 8s are good value youy might as well piss your money up the pub wall??
I would go for the value every time, any fool can see than Man U are most likely to win but to make a profit on here you have to be able to assess how likely and if they are shorter than they should be LAY!
I'm not clever enough to do so in this particular case, unfortunately.
GoldCoastinvestorOk so what is value on a Man U at home win draw no bet.Give us some figures of value??I could back a figure that was "value" but if it loses where is the value in that???take a footy match 1 side is $1.15 the other $8 sure the $8 sid
value is an opinion and it carries no weight in relation to true odds.
I am going to start a thread and in it I'll lump $500 pretend dollars to replicate old mates desire and see where it ends up, will only bet draw no bet, I'll pick out the matches where I think regardless of the price I will back the team I think will provide a win for the bank balance.
See what I can turn $500 into just to prove a point. I bet i can accumulate a balance that would pay off old mates 4K credit card debt in a reasonably short period of time.
value is an opinion and it carries no weight in relation to true odds.I am going to start a thread and in it I'll lump $500 pretend dollars to replicate old mates desire and see where it ends up, will only bet draw no bet, I'll pick out the matches w
Gold Coast, how would you define 'true odds' then? Surely that's just an 'opinion' as well, isn't it? It's very difficult, if not impossible, to precisely determine the true odds of a bet. But we can obviously use statistics, judgement etc. to say what we believe the true odds to be. The more accurate we tend to be with our estimates of true odds, the more successful we will be at finding the value. And that will help us make more money in the long term.
A price for Man U is value to us if, by backing that bet many times over, we believe we would end up with more money than we started with. If we don't believe that, we shouldn't be backing it, irrespective of whether we expect that bet to be a winning one on that particular day.
Gold Coast, how would you define 'true odds' then? Surely that's just an 'opinion' as well, isn't it? It's very difficult, if not impossible, to precisely determine the true odds of a bet. But we can obviously use statistics, judgement etc. to say w
You will only know you have found value after AT LEAST 100 selections
Discipline will get you nowhere unless you have the odds in your favour - end of .
You will only know you have found value after AT LEAST 100 selections Discipline will get you nowhere unless you have the odds in your favour - end of .
If you're taking 1.25 shots that are poor value, I bet good money you'll know your concept of value isn't working long before you've made 100 selections..
If you're taking 1.25 shots that are poor value, I bet good money you'll know your concept of value isn't working long before you've made 100 selections..
gold coast investor, to say that man united will go unbeaten this season after having played five games, i'm sorry but thats just silly.
I seem to recall people saying the same about chelsea last year, they were 1.4 to win the prem after a few games have been played.
gold coast investor, to say that man united will go unbeaten this season after having played five games,i'm sorry but thats just silly. I seem to recall people saying the same about chelsea last year, they were 1.4 to win the prem after a few games h
incidentally the best chance the original poster has to work it up to 4k, is just to put it all on a 9-1 shot, and hope it comes in. any other method will surely lose.
incidentally the best chance the original poster has to work it up to 4k, is just to put it all on a 9-1 shot, and hope it comes in. any other method will surely lose.
Have to agree with you there mp, or just go to a casino and back red a few times.
LordB, there is only one 'true odds' for any given outcome. There are many opinions as to what it might be and those closest to the truth stand best chance of making money.
Have to agree with you there mp, or just go to a casino and back red a few times.LordB, there is only one 'true odds' for any given outcome. There are many opinions as to what it might be and those closest to the truth stand best chance of making mo
Yes Cat, that was my point. I know that, technically, there's one value for 'true odds'. However, since there's no way to be sure of pinpointing that figure, the best we can do is make as well-informed a guess as we can. The best players will be the ones who constantly get very close to the real figure, even though they generally won't know exactly how close they got.
GoldCoast was suggesting that value was just an opinion, and that the important thing was true odds (and yes, I understand the distinction between the two). I was simply asking him what he thought true odds was if it wasn't also simply an opinion?
Yes Cat, that was my point. I know that, technically, there's one value for 'true odds'. However, since there's no way to be sure of pinpointing that figure, the best we can do is make as well-informed a guess as we can. The best players will be the
I'll put all the bets in this thread and we'll go till we pay off old mates CC or until we go bust.
And true to form Paulme picks an upset in this match, must of been good value?? and as sure as day follows night he has lopped on another loser.
1/1 first bet homeliverpool $500 @ $1.25balance $625P/L +$125I'll put all the bets in this thread and we'll go till we pay off old mates CC or until we go bust.And true to form Paulme picks an upset in this match, must of been good value?? and as sur
yep i do pick alotta losers not denying it, although i did just mug lay a horse in a maiden US and it lost so i won £18. nice...
draw no bet on the roma GC. keep going
yep i do pick alotta losers not denying it, although i did just mug lay a horse in a maiden US and it lost so i won £18. nice...draw no bet on the roma GC. keep going
This soon went belly up GCI, i hope this was just a demonstration to paulme, and you havent just lost £625 trying to prove something you didnt have to prove.
This soon went belly up GCI, i hope this was just a demonstration to paulme, and you havent just lost £625 trying to prove something you didnt have to prove.
GoldCoastinvestor 21 Sep 11 11:50 Joined: 28 Aug 10 | Topic/replies: 1,238 | Blogger: GoldCoastinvestor's blog value is an opinion and it carries no weight in relation to true odds.
I am going to start a thread and in it I'll lump $500 pretend dollars to replicate old mates desire and see where it ends up, will only bet draw no bet, I'll pick out the matches where I think regardless of the price I will back the team I think will provide a win for the bank balance.
See what I can turn $500 into just to prove a point. I bet i can accumulate a balance that would pay off old mates 4K credit card debt in a reasonably short period of time.
shame, thought it was real
GoldCoastinvestor21 Sep 11 11:50Joined:28 Aug 10| Topic/replies: 1,238 | Blogger: GoldCoastinvestor's blogvalue is an opinion and it carries no weight in relation to true odds.I am going to start a thread and in it I'll lump $500 pretend dollars to r
What it proves to me is that if you go looking for bets, you'll lose.
I know nothing about any soccer league other than the EPL and carling Cup.
Good thing it was pretend money other wise....... well we want go there.
Well that didn't last long did it???What it proves to me is that if you go looking for bets, you'll lose.I know nothing about any soccer league other than the EPL and carling Cup.Good thing it was pretend money other wise....... well we want go there
what it should prove to you is, unless you are obtaining value you have no hope long term.
Paulme is just a troll who seems to get more enjoyment whinging on the forum than he does from putting in an effort and trying to better his betting
what it should prove to you is, unless you are obtaining value you have no hope long term. Paulme is just a troll who seems to get more enjoyment whinging on the forum than he does from putting in an effort and trying to better his betting
So had I backed them at $2 that would have been a better albeit still losing bet?? so how would that represent "value" it still lost crikey it could have been 20s and still lost but hey it would have been good value???????
So had I backed them at $2 that would have been a better albeit still losing bet?? so how would that represent "value" it still lost crikey it could have been 20s and still lost but hey it would have been good value???????
I have probably backed more poor value winners that have won and allowed me to increase a bank balance than pass them up and still be stuck with the losing bets that were gunna happen regardless of the price.
I'll do a EPL thread atleast give myslef a chance on a comp I actually follow?
I have probably backed more poor value winners that have won and allowed me to increase a bank balance than pass them up and still be stuck with the losing bets that were gunna happen regardless of the price.I'll do a EPL thread atleast give myslef a
for the last time , it doesn't matter over one match, its getting value over a long term sample. I can't make it much clearer. One bet is not going to determine whether you are getting value or not.
for the last time , it doesn't matter over one match, its getting value over a long term sample. I can't make it much clearer. One bet is not going to determine whether you are getting value or not.
Paulme the parasite, I don't need any credibility from a forum , least of all from a troll like you. I am quite happy with my profit/loss and I have never felt the need to have my ego massaged on an internet forum. I am quite happy to engage in debate and I am only offering my advice to Goldcoastinvestor that unless your a obtaining value over a large sample you have no chance to win long term.
My advice to you on the other hand is to stop whining and begging on an internet forum like a pathetic little weasel and get your lazy arse in gear, work hard and see if you can make a few bob. But as has already been proven with your 4,000 posts in the last ten months, you would rather be a troll.
Paulme the parasite, I don't need any credibility from a forum , least of all from a troll like you. I am quite happy with my profit/loss and I have never felt the need to have my ego massaged on an internet forum. I am quite happy to engage in deb
It never ceases to amaze me that people who clearly cannot win on here can be so dismissive of an intelligent and well informed piece of advice offered up by someone who clearly can.
It never ceases to amaze me that people who clearly cannot win on here can be so dismissive of an intelligent and well informed piece of advice offered up by someone who clearly can.
don't be harsh on Paul - I've tried it and it doesn't work. Lacking the empathic facility to see yourself as others see you, he thinks that people repeatedly telling him he's a lonely and loathsome internet troll are just being 'snippy'. being 'people'. doing what people do. He can't allow that people are seriously trying to help him - that would bring everything crashing down. No, we're all horrible snippy inadequates ourselves, all having a go at 'I just wanna be friends Paul'.
don't be harsh on Paul - I've tried it and it doesn't work. Lacking the empathic facility to see yourself as others see you, he thinks that people repeatedly telling him he's a lonely and loathsome internet troll are just being 'snippy'. being 'pe
Gold Coast, do you really not understand the concept of value? Do you really think that a losing bet is automatically poor value because it lost?
Answer me this. Say somebody offers to let me lay Stoke against Man U at 1.25. (Note I'm not laying Man U to win at that price, but Stoke.) Clearly that person would be a bit unhinged or had some insider info. Now let's say that I take them up on this bet. And let's say that Man U pretty much dominate but don't manage to translate that into goals, missing a few sitters, not scoring from a penalty, and then hitting the bar twice. Stoke go 90 minutes without creating a chance. In the last minute, Stoke get a set-piece off a disputed foul and score from the free kick after an incredibly lucky deflection. The match ends 1-0 to Stoke.
Now, let's assume the person offering to let me lay Stoke wasn't dodgy, but just idiotic. Are you really trying to tell me that I got poor value on that bet? Yes, it lost, but you could play that same fixture countless other times and Stoke wouldn't win. In the long term, if I lay Stoke to win at 1.25 against Man U, I'm going to make money. And lots of it.
I accept that's an extreme example, but the same principle applies to all bets in reduced circumstances. If you take on a bet at poor value, you'll lose in the long term, regardless of whether your bet defies its true odds today.
Gold Coast, do you really not understand the concept of value? Do you really think that a losing bet is automatically poor value because it lost?Answer me this. Say somebody offers to let me lay Stoke against Man U at 1.25. (Note I'm not laying Man
Guys, you're wasting your time explaining the simple concept of value. I learnt in the Schalke thread that no matter what you say, the answer will always come back "if it doesn't win it's not value" or along those lines. Even many punters who claim to understand value say this.
So best to just leave them to it.
Guys, you're wasting your time explaining the simple concept of value. I learnt in the Schalke thread that no matter what you say, the answer will always come back "if it doesn't win it's not value" or along those lines. Even many punters who claim t
anyway, stuck £500 on Liverpool to win, Man City to win, Spurs to win or draw.
£693.18 profit.
Balance now £1193.18 :)
Thanks for the tips and advice......anyway, stuck £500 on Liverpool to win, Man City to win, Spurs to win or draw.£693.18 profit.Balance now £1193.18 :)
Jamie Redknapps hot tip of Man City, Liverpool and Chelsea to win treble was 11/10 on skybet.
Chelsea as a single were 1/6, and i didnt really fancy them, so I instead included Spurs win or draw at 1/4.
Liverpool were lucky to escape with the win though.....Wolves had chances in last 10mins to grab equaliser.
Jamie Redknapps hot tip of Man City, Liverpool and Chelsea to win treble was 11/10 on skybet.Chelsea as a single were 1/6, and i didnt really fancy them, so I instead included Spurs win or draw at 1/4.Liverpool were lucky to escape with the win thoug
However your value and my value will at some point on the odds scale meet.
You may think that a price of $1.50 is poor value.
Yet I may think $1.50 is good value.
You may think that the same above game at $1.40 is poor value, and I may think that at that price it is poor value too.
Who is right when it comes to the opinion of value????
Value is just an opinion.However your value and my value will at some point on the odds scale meet.You may think that a price of $1.50 is poor value.Yet I may think $1.50 is good value.You may think that the same above game at $1.40 is poor value, an
Well yes GCI, value is an opinion. And the better and more accurate your opinion, the more successful you'll be. There is a 'true price' for every bet that perfectly sums up the chances of that bet being successful. We can never know for sure what that true price is, but we can judge what we believe it to be. The better our judgement is, and the more often we get a price that's better than the true price, the more successful we'll be.
Let's say the 'true' price of a particular bet is 1.50. You don't know this exact price, but you work everything out and decide that value for you should be 1.60. You only go for that bet if you can get 1.60 or higher. If you do this, and the same bet is replayed time and time again, you'll make money over the long term.
Let's say I come along and look at the same bet. I'm not as good as you. I think 1.25-1.30 should be the true price, and I'm willing to accept 1.35-1.40 as value. I take these prices again and again. Over the long term I'll lose money playing this bet. That's because your judgement is better than mine. As I learn more and improve my judgement, I might get closer to the right price, and might come to realise that 1.35 is a poor deal. But until then, I'm doomed to failure.
Value is about judgement. The better a judge you are, and the more often you correctly identify where there's value (or get close to working out the 'true price', if you prefer), the more successful you'll be.
Well yes GCI, value is an opinion. And the better and more accurate your opinion, the more successful you'll be. There is a 'true price' for every bet that perfectly sums up the chances of that bet being successful. We can never know for sure what t
How about for the next 4 weeks I'll post up my selections
I'll back them with level stakes $100 a bet.
I will run 2 books.
I will have the starting odds on betfair.
Then a book on bets only placed when value is agreed upon using betfairs odds
how does that sound.
We'll have a pretend starting bank of $2000.
Thats cool I understand all that.How about for the next 4 weeks I'll post up my selectionsI'll back them with level stakes $100 a bet.I will run 2 books.I will have the starting odds on betfair.Then a book on bets only placed when value is agreed upo
I will restrict it to 1 maybe 2 bets a day, some days will be no bets I will look for what I think are winners firstly then the price if it ticks all boxes we have a bet, then you can chime in and tell me if you think its good value or not, if it isn't the bet wont go on if it is it will go on.
Should be a bit of fun IMO.
No need for criticisms and snide remarks just a bit of good old fashioned harmless fun at no cost too.
Ok I got the topic up and running.I will restrict it to 1 maybe 2 bets a day, some days will be no bets I will look for what I think are winners firstly then the price if it ticks all boxes we have a bet, then you can chime in and tell me if you thin
GoldCoastinvestor Joined: 28 Aug 10 Replies: 1248 21 Sep 11 08:31 Ok by your own judgement Man U away are a bit of a liaillity, so Why not lump on them at home win draw no bet??
is this a joke?
pmsl, dude theyre about 1/10 to beat most teams at home[smiley:crazy]
GoldCoastinvestor Joined: 28 Aug 10Replies: 1248 21 Sep 11 08:31 Ok by your own judgement Man U away are a bit of a liaillity, so Why not lump on them at home win draw no bet?? is this a joke?pmsl, dude theyre about 1/10 to beat most teams at hom
Meanwhile the Bank of Huddersfield profits continue to roll in, 36 unbeaten now, a 4-0 win away to Brentford yesterday and they were a class above. Hope some of you got on and if not it's still not too late to join.
Meanwhile the Bank of Huddersfield profits continue to roll in, 36 unbeaten now, a 4-0 win away to Brentford yesterday and they were a class above. Hope some of you got on and if not it's still not too late to join.
And that's now 39, with Jordan "benchwarmer" Rhodes now having hit 13 goals in his last 5 games. Even I didn't predict a strike rate like that and I've rated the boy for years.
And that's now 39, with Jordan "benchwarmer" Rhodes now having hit 13 goals in his last 5 games. Even I didn't predict a strike rate like that and I've rated the boy for years.
And a 2-2 draw at Scunny brings up the 40 unbeaten, though perhaps a close shave tonight as Scunny had 2 penalties saved. If Walsall and Yeovil can be negotiated without defeat, Chelsea's 42 game run will be equalled, leaving only Arsenal's 49 to catch, excluding non-league.
And a 2-2 draw at Scunny brings up the 40 unbeaten, though perhaps a close shave tonight as Scunny had 2 penalties saved. If Walsall and Yeovil can be negotiated without defeat, Chelsea's 42 game run will be equalled, leaving only Arsenal's 49 to cat
Another day, another winner. For the 41st consecutive game (!!) the lay of their opponents brings home the bacon, today at 5.3. To me the perceived 18% chance of them losing when they've now gone 89% of an entire season's length unbeaten was, as usual, excellent value (both figures rounded down).
Another day, another winner. For the 41st consecutive game (!!) the lay of their opponents brings home the bacon, today at 5.3. To me the perceived 18% chance of them losing when they've now gone 89% of an entire season's length unbeaten was, as usua
As you were, 42 unbeaten now after a 1-1 draw with Walsall. That's Chelsea's run equalled, one more game will put the Terriers in clear second place behind Arsenal's 49. The lay prices are getting bigger though, the market's started to wise up.
As you were, 42 unbeaten now after a 1-1 draw with Walsall. That's Chelsea's run equalled, one more game will put the Terriers in clear second place behind Arsenal's 49. The lay prices are getting bigger though, the market's started to wise up.
I was wrong about Chelsea, it was Notts Forest who did 42 unbeaten. Anyway, that record has now been overtaken and we're up to 43 after yesterday's win against Notts County. Hope the OP is still on board. Toughest possible test next week though, away to League leaders Charlton. Funny thing is last week the Terriesr lost 4-1 away to League 2 Swindon but as it was in the cup it doesn't count of course.
I was wrong about Chelsea, it was Notts Forest who did 42 unbeaten. Anyway, that record has now been overtaken and we're up to 43 after yesterday's win against Notts County. Hope the OP is still on board. Toughest possible test next week though, away
Everyone else lost interest in this thread long ago Frimpong but for me the laying of Huddersfield's opponents continues. That has obviously been anything but a failure. When they finally do lose a game perhaps I'll let the thread fade away.
Everyone else lost interest in this thread long ago Frimpong but for me the laying of Huddersfield's opponents continues. That has obviously been anything but a failure. When they finally do lose a game perhaps I'll let the thread fade away.
Pouint being Frimpong that if the OP had followed my advice he'd probably be getting quite close to achieving his goal of turning £500 into over £3000 by now. Who knows, maybe he did and is still on board? If they don't lose next week he'll achieve it by then (if he goes for the straight lay option anyway. If he's on DNB it could take longer depending on the result).
Pouint being Frimpong that if the OP had followed my advice he'd probably be getting quite close to achieving his goal of turning £500 into over £3000 by now. Who knows, maybe he did and is still on board? If they don't lose next week he'll achieve