Just having a look at the early horse markets and via the history one thing that immediately strikes you is the number of 1-3k matches there have apparently been certainly in the first few races of this afternoon that I have looked at. Yes I know they count the money differently but hopefully I have accounted for that correctly.
A classic appears to be Brighton 3:00pm History as I type shows only the following:
Royal Accademician 3.65 £8,110 Royal Majestic 4.6 £510 Grand Rapids 4.7 £8,351 Marcus Augustus 5.9 £590 4.1 £6,830 Counterglow - nothing matched as yet
BF's matched total over the whole race so far is 2,944
So on purple there have been apparently single significant matches on 3 of the runners, but when are these done and who is leaving up £2ks or similar to be matched or asking for 2ks that then get matched?
The currently money waiting in the markets on purple doesn't make sense compared to what has already been traded on this race, so what are they up to?
In fact this whole thing is obviously a farce as the pattern is repeated in all races.
Even the 8:20 at Sligo has already seen interest in 3 of the runners as one off bets, whilst BF not surprisingly as seen just 224 matched
In fact this whole thing is obviously a farce as the pattern is repeated in all races. Even the 8:20 at Sligo has already seen interest in 3 of the runners as one off bets, whilst BF not surprisingly as seen just 224 matched
I tried betd@q during Goodwood as it's usually a minger of a meeting for me anyway. I certainly didn't get what I would have on betfair but it wasn't at all bad and that applied to the lesser meetings as well. I never thought I'd see the day I'd have 2.5K @ 7.0 at a Leicester night meeting on betd@q. As I rarely got anything that wasn't simultaneously available on betfair I often wondered if they were hedging the money back here anyway. More likely it would be bot users using both sites but not that it matters in any case. Put it this way, if everyone using betfair went through betd@q and they sent the money back here, betd@q would get all the commission and would owe betfair nothing as they'd end up breaking even on every market. It would obviously be pointless betd@q doing this but it does illustrate a shortcoming of betfair's commission system. I'm not saying I've stopped using betfair but I'm in the process of automating my betting and my betd@q experience was enough to convince me that this should be a dual operation.
As I was one of the people who defended the original pc (although never in the form it took), and I'm now hit with the charge myself, this may all seem a bit hypocritical to many of you. It's not the charge itself that's brought about this change of heart (the percentage increase for me is small compared to some), it's more down to the recent changes having finally convinced me we're dealing with s c u m. In the old days (when traders and cheats were practically using the site free of charge) I assumed I was dealing with naive, nice-but-dim, ex-city, delusional, half wits who believed the cr@p they were fed in their previous employment and who had unintentionally got themselves into a spot with their inadequate commission system and their parasite / cheat assisting interface. Maybe they thought all these artificially created "proffessional gamblers" were a good advertisement for the exchange (has that spectacularly backfired or what). When they first introduced the pc and noises were being made within betfair about winners being bad for them I actually thought a few light bulbs were being turned on and it would only be a matter of time before their thinking would be in sync with my own. Alas, these recent changes suggest they just don't give a sh1t and they're happy for it all to continue provided they get a bigger slice of the action. In fact, reading between the lines, it seems likely they'll be joining in the shell and pea fun themselves, maybe even creating a few new "edges" using their priveleged position. IMO it's also only a matter of time before government take a leaf out of betfair's book and start taxing exchange winners. With a bit of common sense betfair could run a fair exchange, cut costs, avoid user taxation and make even more.
Come the revolution I'll be prompting the revolutionary justice council to lump betfair in with the financial sector.
I tried betd@q during Goodwood as it's usually a minger of a meeting for me anyway. I certainly didn't get what I would have on betfair but it wasn't at all bad and that applied to the lesser meetings as well. I never thought I'd see the day I'd have
Eddie the eagle Joined: 01 Feb 04 Replies: 3972 03 Aug 11 12:47 Can anyone confirm the rumours about snow falling in hell ?
Odwyer has backed it at 1.25, he'll be cashing in a winner.
Eddie the eagle Joined: 01 Feb 04Replies: 3972 03 Aug 11 12:47 Can anyone confirm the rumours about snow falling in hell ? Odwyer has backed it at 1.25, he'll be cashing in a winner.
Youre (for the most part) an intelligent chap, a bit barmy, but certainly smart.
I hope that you keep your new point of view.[;)]
Welcome to our world Feck.Youre (for the most part) an intelligent chap, a bit barmy, but certainly smart. I hope that you keep your new point of view.
Ok longbridge, I'll retract that as I don't believe they would lie to their regulators.
As you said though, they said that in the past. I wonder if they'll say it again.
Ok longbridge, I'll retract that as I don't believe they would lie to their regulators.As you said though, they said that in the past. I wonder if they'll say it again.