|
By:
Getting crushed....
Don't really see why, Q4FY2011 was good... and Q1FY2012 has actaully started very well. (but markets might be irrational longer than I can stay Liquid LOL) ........................ I thought the same on first reading fwiw. but accounts and attached blurb will always look good on first reading, by design, as it's partly investor PR. It's when you delve deeper into the figures that you get a better appreciation of what's going on. Looking at the positives it's good to see the brokers and markets have given the thumbs down to their latest venture. |
|
By:
Clyde.
looking at the growth Sport by sport - they are really all positive. in top seven sports 5 show good growth 2 are flattish ( though in 2012 racing looks like it will reverse this trend) the turnover for Q1FY2012 is ticking along very nicely also.... so I will expecting good Q1FY2012 |
|
By:
Magic. It's 2011 dude!
|
|
By:
Magician, I dont know what your experiences with stock markets are, but I can assure you that investors (the market) are much more interested in earnings and performance in the coming year(s) than they are in numbers allready released.
The biggest concern for Betfair share holders is how can the company grow. All this talk and rumours of Countries imposing restrictions certainly is a big negative. Another concern imo that could be a bigger threat, even if most share holders in unaware of it, is that Betfair is now opening up for big growth for one or more of their competitors by raising the Premium Charges. |
|
By:
Bayes , Betfair's yearly reprts are baesed on 12 month periods from May to April, hence the FY 2011.
|
|
By:
Bayes
FY2012.... I am commenting on Q1FY2012 we are some 65 days into it already - and turnover looks good |
|
By:
Shows what a clown I am!
|
|
By:
Its getting down to a ore realistic level but think it may go at 4.50 or so before it bottoms out.
BF was sold on a completely unrealistic multiple so most of this drop is just a natural correction as people have woken up to the fact that BF isn't gonna conquer the world. |
|
By:
I agree with racingguru the price needs to get to a realistiuc level before it bottoms out.I think 4.50 or lower too.
The stock market drop and world market slow down and also the big worry today of european debt contagian doenst at all help the share.A big worry more countries in europe will shut the door on betting exchanges at a time people are spending less and taking the time to pay off their credit /debit card debts etc. |
|
By:
Surely pure karma that it should lose between 40 and 60% of it's original price.
|
|
By:
racingguru
Date Joined: 06 Jan 01 Add contact | Send message When: 11 Jul 11 15:36 Joined: Date Joined: 06 Jan 01 | Topic/replies: 182 | Blogger: racingguru's blog Its getting down to a ore realistic level but think it may go at 4.50 or so before it bottoms out. BF was sold on a completely unrealistic multiple so most of this drop is just a natural correction as people have woken up to the fact that BF isn't gonna conquer the world. The reason the multiple is dropping is that Betfair is becoming a traditional bookmaker (p/e 12 like Willhill) and moving a way from being a betting exchange (p/e 34). They're killing their own growth by disincentivising their most profitable customers to invest in long term solutions to profit from the exchange. It's more a case of make as much money as possible, as quickly as possible before the game's up. Unless Betfair reverse the decision to develop their bookmaking business at the expense of their betting exchange business, things won't end well. If Betfair thinks they can get rid of winners and seed the whole exchange themselves, they might as well go ahead and try boiling the ocean. They can be a low cost operator: betting exchange, or a relatively high margin operator: traditional bookie. If they try to combine the two (currently they exist separately), another company will inevitably take over as the world's largest betting exchange. |
|
By:
Theinvestor2,
You are absolutely right. It's all too common with high tech companies that go public. They diversify away from their initial product. Diversifications fail and the neglect of their core product caused by the diversification sees that overtaken by a competitor. |
|
By:
"On balance, I reckon these shares are a bad bet.
Will Betfair find the going any better this week? Unikely. So far, July has not treated the betting exchange kindly. But then, neither did June or May. This morning shares fell 4% after closing down nearly 6% on Friday, taking them to just 654.5p. When Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley floated it last October, they persuaded investors it was worth… ahem, 1300p. Well done, lads: big fee well earned. So what's going on? As anyone who's considered taking a flutter on online gambling stocks will tell you, there's a massive risk involved in their operations overseas, where many countries still take a dim view of online gambling. Fines and trading bans have a nasty habit of appearing out of the blue from governments launching electioneering clampdowns. What's more, there are fewer gamblers these days and Britons don't have the money to spend dabbling around on the horses. But investors are also getting wise to more of a Betfair-specific problem. There's a growing suspicion among analysts that the company is being a tad too aggressive with its accounting practices. Betfair is having to invest in developing its IT to run faster, better services. The question is, does this spending always show through clearly in its profit figures? Betfair put up to £25 million of its IT development costs last year on its balance sheet instead of taking it out of its profit figures as a more conservative company might. A nice chap from Betfair explains this simply gives a better picture of the underlying way the business is performing during a three-year heavy investment period, smoothing out the costs. But some investors are still unnerved and troubled about the implications for Betfair's value. You see, if you put that £25 million through the profit and loss account underlying profits come out about 30% lower. To make things more scary, that £25 million expensed cost is about £10 million up on the previous year - one hell of an acceleration in the wrong direction. As one investor told me this morning, if you see Betfair as, say, an IG Index for wannabe turf accountants, you can understand the concern. IG's shares today value it at 12.5 times its expected profits for 2012. Betfair is valued at 18.5 times. Sounding toppy? That's nothing. Put Betfair's IT development cost through the P&L and the share price is a thumping multiple of 24 times. That seems like the kind of mispriced bet that would see you getting crucified by Betfair's famously sharp customers. Chief executive David Yu recently announced he was off. Shareholders should follow." http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/markets/article-23968817-murdoch-could-reach-for-sky-with-uk-papers-sell-off.do |
|
By:
I would think large parts of the business must be loss making. Had it just stuck to being a betting exchange and concentrated all its efforts into that, I'm sure it would be in a lot better position than it is now. As a stand alone exchange the business was marketing itself. It would be a simpler, leaner fighting machine.
|
|
By:
None of the other parts of the business would stand a snowballs chance in hell of being succesful as stand alone products, they just cling on like parasites using the Betfair brand to garnish what profit they can, but in doing so they damage the core product and the brand.
|
|
By:
Those IT costs were all about servicing the needs of middlemen. The only people in the world who like middlemen would appear to be middlemen and betfair management. Cut out the middlemen you stupid ****s.
|
|
By:
Trading is the future feck [;)]
|
|
By:
The future is shown below Investor.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
But that's all blank Feck ?
Bit ott ? |
|
By:
It's also so too unFeck like.
|
|
By:
feck's right about that. that's everyone's future for a while yet. also my future on the ubf feck
![]() |
|
By:
TheInvestor2
The reason the multiple is dropping is that Betfair is becoming a traditional bookmaker (p/e 12 like Willhill) and moving a way from being a betting exchange (p/e 34). They're killing their own growth by disincentivising their most profitable customers to invest in long term solutions to profit from the exchange. It's more a case of make as much money as possible, as quickly as possible before the game's up. Unless Betfair reverse the decision to develop their bookmaking business at the expense of their betting exchange business, things won't end well. If Betfair thinks they can get rid of winners and seed the whole exchange themselves, they might as well go ahead and try boiling the ocean. They can be a low cost operator: betting exchange, or a relatively high margin operator: traditional bookie. If they try to combine the two (currently they exist separately), another company will inevitably take over as the world's largest betting exchange. one of the best posts on here for a long time. spot on. |
|
By:
TheInvestor2
The reason the multiple is dropping is that Betfair is becoming a traditional bookmaker (p/e 12 like Willhill) and moving a way from being a betting exchange (p/e 34). They're killing their own growth by disincentivising their most profitable customers to invest in long term solutions to profit from the exchange. It's more a case of make as much money as possible, as quickly as possible before the game's up. Unless Betfair reverse the decision to develop their bookmaking business at the expense of their betting exchange business, things won't end well. If Betfair thinks they can get rid of winners and seed the whole exchange themselves, they might as well go ahead and try boiling the ocean. They can be a low cost operator: betting exchange, or a relatively high margin operator: traditional bookie. If they try to combine the two (currently they exist separately), another company will inevitably take over as the world's largest betting exchange. one of the best posts on here for a long time. spot on. |
|
By:
well said...
|
|
By:
x2
|
|
By:
Investor, why do you think they couldn't seed the markets themselves?
|
|
By:
I'm not Investor, but if Mansion couldn't do it and more importantly WSEX couldn't do it with all their experience, why on earth would Betfair be able to do it?
|
|
By:
Investor, why do you think they couldn't seed the markets themselves?
catfleppo vs the betfair bot? |
|
By:
What happened with TheUltimateToryBoyForum charlatan? Did you say Sir Fred wasn't deserving of his pension or some equally heinous crime.
|
|
By:
catfleppo
Date Joined: 22 Feb 07 Add contact | Send message When: 13 Jul 11 08:46 Joined: Date Joined: 22 Feb 07 | Topic/replies: 71 | Blogger: catfleppo's blog Investor, why do you think they couldn't seed the markets themselves? I'd say they can under certain circumstances, but in any case it would create a conflict of interests. If they tried to seed the whole thing, offering prices like a traditional bookie with the addition of being able to lay, they would get killed. Unless they widened they spread significantly. In that case they would simply have stopped being an exchange. After going from 'winners welcome' to 'winners tolerated', many are concerned that this shift in Betfair's policy is a continuing trend. |
|
By:
The fact they've turned their exchange into Last5minutes.com makes seeding a lot less daunting a prospect. Also, according to our altruistic Ferengi friends they'll be only too willing to fill in the spreads.
|
|
By:
Betfair will get killed if they seed/participate in their own exchange markets.... even with the advantages of cross matching and clock beating. this will not be enough to protect them from wider participation.
if the separately lay selected customers, and arb back to exchange - they could make some money. Last5Minutes - is so true, but there is a very good reason for that |
|
By:
Betfair will get killed if they seed/participate in their own exchange markets.... even with the advantages of cross matching and clock beating. this will not be enough to protect them from wider participation.
if the separately lay selected customers, and arb back to exchange - they could make some money. Last5Minutes - is so true, but there is a very good reason for that |
|
By:
Betfair have the advantage of stacks of api usage data that they can use to see how people like me have been placing bets. True they can't see my algorithm but they could do a reasonable job of reverse engineering I reckon. The downside would be a loss of the p2p concept but they seem to be inching in that direction anyway.
|
|
By:
What if you have bet with Betfair. If you make mistake they say CAVIT Emptor, but if one day you bet not against other peoples but against Betfair, they might void bet if their trader make mistake?
|
|
By:
Betfair is good company Lori. They are better than other company and will make betting work good.
|
|
By:
ballabriggs, you joined two days ago, and just about every single post you have made is praising betfair....how long have you worked for them?
|
|
By:
ffs..WE all work for Betfair.
|
|
By:
Seeding the markets is a catch22 for bf.
Because they need a fair market to work from and only a true exchange can provide that. FYI, a couple of days ago what looked like a bot got taken to the cleaners by astute cricket traders to the tune at least 20K The suspicion is that it was bf trialing a new bot in an obscure market. |