|
By:
Feck N. Eejit
Date Joined: 10 Jan 02 No. The exception would be ir. As I wouldn't allow any form of cheating I'd have to take the other firm to court to expose the fact that much of their "liquidity" was cheat based. Nonsense, why havn't you taken betfair to court yet? How would you stop those people who know the result beforehand from betting? Is there really only one singular way to have a bet which isn't considered cheating? |
|
By:
viva, you must be a carpenter because I don't think it's possible to hit the nail on the head more perfect !
I think you're the one that got hit on the head Eddie. You've been hanging out with these delusionals for so long you've turned into one yourself. Nonsense, why havn't you taken betfair to court yet? Case is pending. How would you stop those people who know the result beforehand from betting? Betfair would be the ones that would have to do that. Is there really only one singular way to have a bet which isn't considered cheating? Don't know what kind of answer you expect to that. |
|
By:
Only kidding baldloaf. You sound worried though.
|
|
By:
Only really three things im worried about
-betfairs greed -people defending betfairs greed -site outages |
|
By:
like all true obsessives, feck mistakes his own willingness to keep talking about a subject longer than anyone else for objective proof that he's right.
If you want proof that I'm right look at the tote. How many traders are there on that? If you think pool betting is the only way of allowing gamblers to bet with each other without traders then you're not exactly a visionary. |
|
By:
So much so that you should apply for a job in the betfair think tank.
|
|
By:
I believe there are some extremely successful syndicates winning on the Tote in Hong Kong, in a computer intensive sort of manner ?
Not sure though that this qualifies as "trading" and thus negates the essence of your Tote analogy. |
|
By:
Doesn't qualify FAFH. One of the biggest HK mobs win big on here as well but they're not traders.
|
|
By:
Now that is interesting to hear.
Anywhere I can read about what they are doing on BF. The HK stuff is pretty well written up for public consumption. |
|
By:
Not that I know of FAFH.
|