General Betting
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
04 Feb 11
10:48
Joined:
Date Joined:
12 Mar 07
You'll only get sensible views if and when you start to make sensible posts.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 10
|
By:
How does that help? What I have noticed on this forum is that there are genuine people looking for pointers alongside smug know-alls who delight in ridiculing everything that is said. Saying my post 'isn't sensible' is dumb ... you need to explain yourself. All I can do is present the facts - a tippung service with nine wins out of 10. OK, here's a question. If ti acheived 99 out of 110 or 999 out of 1,000 (I know this won't happen) would that be good enough. When does a tipping service prove itself?
|
|
By:
Well done Richiscoul.
|
|
By:
When does a tipping service prove itself?
When the sample size is statistically significant and proofed. You should be able to do the maths on that yourself. |
|
By:
So you are the expert ... when is it significant?
|
|
By:
When you're on your super yacht in Antibes.
|
|
By:
I've posted many times on how to calculate statistical significance.
There are various calculators online, learn to use one. Clue: 9 out of 10 is not even close |
|
By:
But I am on my super yacht!!!
Can we call a truce please???!!! I think it is a valid question about when a system proves itself, if indeed it ever does. |
|
By:
The trouble I'm having, and hence my tone, is that if you're providing a tipping service, this stuff should be trivial to you.
I've got nothing against tipsters (although I have against spammers) and nothing against new posters (I've posted a lot of help on here over the years), but you can't have it both ways. |
|
By:
I'm not providing a tipping service. I'm reviewing a tipping service
|
|
By:
Start with level stake profit. Very old fashion but removes 'fictional' staking plans.....(i.e. "I recommend 1 to 3 stars)"
1 star lose 1 star lose 3 star lose 3 star win at 2/1 = down 3 pts = chase |