Starting with a bank of £2000 and laying two horses a day at odds of over 500 for a £2 stake you would double your money in a year. Anyone tried anything like this?
4 winners this year alone at SP odds of 600, 814.82 and 2 x 1000. At a £2 stake per runner over 500, you would have lost £6829.64. At a commission rate of 5%, you would have needed 3595 successful lays just to break even.
4 winners this year alone at SP odds of 600, 814.82 and 2 x 1000. At a £2 stake per runner over 500, you would have lost £6829.64. At a commission rate of 5%, you would have needed 3595 successful lays just to break even.
cumbrianlad 23 Dec 10 13:09 4 winners this year alone at SP odds of 600, 814.82 and 2 x 1000. At a £2 stake per runner over 500, you would have lost £6829.64. At a commission rate of 5%, you would have needed 3595 successful lays just to break even.
Can you please post a link to these results? Ta.
cumbrianlad 23 Dec 10 13:094 winners this year alone at SP odds of 600, 814.82 and 2 x 1000. At a £2 stake per runner over 500, you would have lost £6829.64. At a commission rate of 5%, you would have needed 3595 successful lays just to break even.
2 years ago i began laying horses that had drifted to over 100 on here, max price 120. For example going from 65 to 110. I had a winning run of over 150 @£11 stakes everytime. I only stopped because i had 3 close calls as i approached the 150th winning bet, one traded @ 1.3 in the final 50 yards.
Its ok as a bit of fun, trying to make £100 / £150 per week, but you have to be prepared to lose alot when they win. I may start again when the flat season gets up and running.
2 years ago i began laying horses that had drifted to over 100 on here, max price 120.For example going from 65 to 110.I had a winning run of over 150 @£11 stakes everytime. I only stopped because i had 3 close calls as i approached the 150th winnin
Oh and if they drifted above my max price, i`d just put a lay i/r aroung 90. Also on all bets i`d put i/r lay at around 6/7. Not for the faint hearted though.
Oh and if they drifted above my max price, i`d just put a lay i/r aroung 90.Also on all bets i`d put i/r lay at around 6/7. Not for the faint hearted though.
As far as I know there was only one in the previous 9 or so years before those, so I reckon the 1000.0 layers will still be ahead of the backers by quite a margin.
19-Jun-10 Redcar 5.20 100029-Oct-10 Wetherby 3.35 1000 As far as I know there was only one in the previous 9 or so years before those, so I reckon the 1000.0 layers will still be ahead of the backers by quite a margin.
Aunty - It doesn`t help my position. All lays i put on here i lay again at shorter odds i/r. If original lay was @ 5 i`ll also lay @2.2 & 1.5 if over 5/6/7/f.
I have come unstuck once, paying out a fortune, that was down to my own lack of discipline. I was bored one Wednesday evening and Wolves was on
It can be a good way of betting, but avoid maiden / novice hurdles & small aw fields which arn`t competitive.
Aunty - It doesn`t help my position. All lays i put on here i lay again at shorter odds i/r.If original lay was @ 5 i`ll also lay @2.2 & 1.5 if over 5/6/7/f.I have come unstuck once, paying out a fortune, that was down to my own lack of discipline.
cumbrianlad 23 Dec 10 13:09 4 winners this year alone at SP odds of 600, 814.82 and 2 x 1000. At a £2 stake per runner over 500, you would have lost £6829.64. At a commission rate of 5%, you would have needed 3595 successful lays just to break even.
So four winners above 500 at sp. Do you have the stats for horses who's sp was below 500 but reached over 500 in play and won?
cumbrianlad 23 Dec 10 13:094 winners this year alone at SP odds of 600, 814.82 and 2 x 1000. At a £2 stake per runner over 500, you would have lost £6829.64. At a commission rate of 5%, you would have needed 3595 successful lays just to break even.