Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

General Betting

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
unemployable
11 Jun 10 21:47
Joined:
Date Joined: 26 May 10
| Topic/replies: 49 | Blogger: unemployable's blog
I don't recall seeing any announcement from BF that they we're going to introduce an increased bet processing delay for the world cup.

Why they have chosen to do so is bizarre as it's pretty bloody obvious nobody has any sort of time advantage that would warrant such a decision.

I would ask why it has neither been mentioned or consulted upon, but that seems to be the way with these muppets nowadays.

Well done BF, you've found an innovative & excellent way to reduce liquidity on a tournament that you basically redesigned your whole homepage for.

These first 2 matches have turned over not much more than an IPL 20-20 match.

Clueless pillocks imo.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 34
By:
Rocket to the FACE
When: 11 Jun 10 21:55
Increased bet delay?

6 seconds is LESS than the 7 or 9 seconds often offered.
By:
unemployable
When: 11 Jun 10 22:03
I'm not talking about mickey mouse spanish or continental domestic football.

This is the main event.

A 6 sec spinning clock is utterly ridiculous & not justifiable. It protects no-one & hinders everyone.
By:
Rocket to the FACE
When: 11 Jun 10 22:10
So what are you talking about/comparing it to?

What delay would you think acceptable? I think they've got it spot on.
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 11 Jun 10 22:13
If you knew how much the BBC coverage was delayed you'd want them to increase the delay.
By:
unemployable
When: 11 Jun 10 22:35
clydebank that is nonsense. the pan european feeds are relatively synchrinous. There is no sat lag. They are all provided from the same source.

rocket - well what can I say, you obviously think you know a lot about this stuff. lol.
By:
Rocket to the FACE
When: 11 Jun 10 22:48
Not at all, unemployable.

Maybe you think you know a lot about this stuff?

If so, maybe you could tell me why the current delay is not acceptable?
By:
Hajrá Ferencváros!
When: 12 Jun 10 08:05
Maybe he travelled to SA with a laptop, and now nervous because could not beat the clock lol.
By:
Youcannotbeserious
When: 12 Jun 10 16:31
the coverage i am watching is a good 3 seconds behind live traders in the stadium...could even be 4 seconds...

i would be nervous with a 5 second delay ..so i am happy with how they have it
By:
The Investor
When: 12 Jun 10 22:29
yeah it's fine if necessary.

I've seen markets getting suspended about 3-4 seconds before I see the goal on tv, Betfair have obviously got a better feed.
By:
Contrarian
When: 12 Jun 10 22:33
If anything it should be slightly more - 7 or 8 seconds. Today I got hoovered when the South Koreans broke through and almost scored. Those at the stadium have got a massive advantage.
By:
viva el presidente!
When: 13 Jun 10 00:05
recreational punters are watching it on digital, which is at least 5 secs behind reality.

pretty simple really.
By:
luloo
When: 13 Jun 10 00:09
those at the stadium have a big advantage,they also have big xs so why do you not join them.
By:
viva el presidente!
When: 13 Jun 10 00:27
the point is, if the delay doesn't protect people from courtsiders, then no one will put up money in running who's not physically at the event and markets will die.

whenever I read these threads I find it hard not to suspect the OP's missed out on a couple of hooverings by a second or two and got the hump. which is a sign that the system's working.
By:
Joel
When: 13 Jun 10 02:56
There really shouldnt be any delay, surely it would take 6 seconds for any courtsiders to stop playing their vuvuzela and return to their computers/phones when a goal is scored.
By:
mginvest
When: 13 Jun 10 14:44
So if that sort of delay is acceptable to BF for football why not for racing. Do laptop users at the ground live in some parallel universe or something? Sat delays exist in every sport coverage but apparently racing is exempt as far as BF are concerned.
By:
Lori
When: 13 Jun 10 16:10
I think it's because nobody gives a crap about racing
By:
Windsor to Waterlooville
When: 13 Jun 10 16:29
lori,

Betfair do, as it is their high earner due to amount of races and the levels of money won and/or lost as opposed to a lot of the other in running events where the volumes are just traded back and forth.
By:
Lori
When: 13 Jun 10 16:33
I mean normal gamblers though. Horse racing is just all the trainers and lads betting against each other, so it's fine for betfair to just let them get on with it.

Ask the average mugs in the street what they bet on and it won't be horses in this day and age.
By:
Windsor to Waterlooville
When: 13 Jun 10 16:46
sorry, didn't realise you were talking about sports betting in general.
Thought you were responding to the 'why is there no long delay in horse racing in-running ' post.
By:
Lori
When: 13 Jun 10 16:53
I think there's no long delay in horse racing because all the people betting on it have fast pics or are at the races.
There was a report by the Gaming Commision recently that supported this view.

In other sports, most people are betting from "normal" tv and against people who have fast pictures and so the delay is put in to protect them.

The delay in tennis is so long it's actually protecting the fast pic merchants, but that's for another thread.
By:
mginvest
When: 13 Jun 10 19:33
Lori that doesn't make sense. Not many have fast pics and going to the track is just as difficult for most as going to a football match.

The GC are just making assumptions based on their very limited knowledge of the subject. Just what qualifications anyone in that joke of an outfit has to judge betting in general is a mystery to me.

the reason the delay is so short in comparison is for financial reasons only imv.
By:
Lori
When: 13 Jun 10 20:51
Are there not shops set up for fast pic traing on horses?
By:
mginvest
When: 13 Jun 10 21:06
Yes but A - they are only SIS feeds and B - Not everyone can get to them much like not everyone being able to get to the course. So how is it fair that those that can get to the track or event have such an advantage of the rest of BF customers. The whole point is that the delays are there to ensure nobody has an unfair advantage except it seems for horse racing. Why?
By:
curlywurly
When: 13 Jun 10 21:13
you've already said - betfairs bottom line

plus most horse racing punters are so one-eyed they cannot see they're getting blantantly ripped off
By:
Windsor to Waterlooville
When: 13 Jun 10 21:16
mg,

As I said earlier and you have also, the delay on horse racing is at 1sec for financial reasons. The revenue is huge.
By:
The Visionary
When: 13 Jun 10 21:16
If you put a bigger delay in racing the mugs would get fleeced even quicker than they do now.

Can you imagine in a jumps race submitting your bet and having to wait 5 secs before it hits the market on top of the probable 5+ secs behind live that your pics are?

....and in a flat race how many lengths does 5 secs equate to?
By:
The Visionary
When: 13 Jun 10 21:17
what I don't really understand is the 1 sec delay in racing.  Seems irrelevant.
By:
Lori
When: 13 Jun 10 21:19
I've asked for lesser delay in tennis for a long time for the reason you described Visionary.

It's even more annoying in tennis as without the delay there would actually be neutral periods where you are definitely between points, where you could trade on a level playing field. The 5s delay spoils this (also in cricket, same principle.)
By:
curlywurly
When: 13 Jun 10 21:20
as for the original poster a 6 sec delay is very much appreciated if you're trying to play on the bookings or corners markets. i'd make a case for 7 secs
By:
Windsor to Waterlooville
When: 13 Jun 10 21:23
Visionary,

The 1 sec delay allows the 'best matching logic' formula to work its magic, which again results in huge risk free revenue.
By:
The Visionary
When: 13 Jun 10 21:24
Yes Lori I see what you mean as it would make calculating the neutral period (certainly in tennis) much easier with less delay.

Football is a unique case though because of the suspend function which apparently protects punters.  Whilst there is suspend then the delay should be extended to whatever period is deemed necessary for nobody to see a critical event prior to Betfair's monkey.
By:
The Visionary
When: 13 Jun 10 21:26
That may be the case today Windsor but has been no cross matching for the majority of BF's in-running existence on horses.  Historically it seems strange as I cannot believe 1sec offers any protection apart from those at the very edge of seeing the action first.
By:
mginvest
When: 13 Jun 10 21:29
1 sec offers no protection as you say unless you are on course and lightning quick. Football has the suspend protection but they don't have it in horse racing because everything happens so fast. The only real advantage a bet delay gives is the chance to cancel an order,but as you say 1 sec ain't enough for those not on course.
By:
SM
When: 13 Jun 10 21:40
Most of the in-play bet delays on betfair are arbitrary but surely none more so than the utterly pointless five second delay on golf.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com