Sorry tobermoray................not referring to you.....just anyone who backs or lays to gain the same level of profit on a LAY ...or to same liability on a LAY...or backs same stake son a 20-1 SP shot as they would on a 2-1 shot etc etc
No account being taken in the value in the bet.........just a guesser IMO that bets that way
OppppppppppssssssssssssssssssSorry tobermoray................not referring to you.....just anyone who backs or lays to gain the same level of profit on a LAY ...or to same liability on a LAY...or backs same stake son a 20-1 SP shot as they would on
Bit Harsh DFC , not a level staking fan myself- although I do use it in 1 of my systems - but wouldn't call advocates of the staking plan guessers , conservative yes - when my edge is small I'd go for level staking approach also.
Bit Harsh DFC , not a level staking fan myself- although I do use it in 1 of my systems - but wouldn't call advocates of the staking plan guessers , conservative yes - when my edge is small I'd go for level staking approach also.
Just answering his question .He is wanting to avoid having too much on one bet so level stakes would prevent that.
Level Stakes is in any case appropriate for a method whereby you know you are getting value on every bet ( with a few unknowable exceptions) , but there is no way of quantifying the value.
Just answering his question .He is wanting to avoid having too much on one bet so level stakes would prevent that.Level Stakes is in any case appropriate for a method whereby you know you are getting value on every bet ( with a few unknowable excepti
Thanks for the replies, all really useful, NOT. Will try chit chat in future.
Had a think over the weekend and i'm currently testing a new system out now which involves spreading a % of profit over this weeks bets to hopefully help me win a bit more profit and so all losers wont be my biggest bets unless i hit a run of 0 winners in seven bets.
Last 4 bets 2 winners and 2 seconds.
Thanks for the replies, all really useful, NOT. Will try chit chat in future.Had a think over the weekend and i'm currently testing a new system out now which involves spreading a % of profit over this weeks bets to hopefully help me win a bit more p
how do you build a bank up to maximise profits without your biggest bets being losing ones?
Nobody can really answer this without the following for starters and you won't get a better answer on any other forum without some key stats
Strike Rate ( per market ) Avg Lay or Back Price Past Results (Trends) Do you advocate a stop loss system How many bets do you put on at the same time How many different markets
picknowpaylater 25 Apr 22:23 how do you build a bank up to maximise profits without your biggest bets being losing ones? Nobody can really answer this without the following for startersand you won't get a better answer on any other forum without
Strike Rate ( per market ) - worst 76%, best 93% Avg Lay or Back Price 13 Past Results (Trends) ? Do you advocate a stop loss system - when bank is zero How many bets do you put on at the same time - one How many different markets - ? uk horse racing only
whaddya think? I started out level stakes but changed it to liability...
I'd like to know the exact same thing.Strike Rate ( per market ) - worst 76%, best 93%Avg Lay or Back Price 13Past Results (Trends) ?Do you advocate a stop loss system - when bank is zeroHow many bets do you put on at the same time - oneHow many diff
picknowpaylater 25 Apr 22:23 how do you build a bank up to maximise profits without your biggest bets being losing ones?
Your biggest bets being losing ones doesn't have much to do with building up a bank. As your stakes increase, both your winning bets and losing bets should increase in size. Unless your biggest bets are losing ones to begin with, there's no reason that this should become the case at a later stage.
However, if you successfully compound and reinvest profits, your drawdowns will increase over time (in £, not %). That's just a natural part of growth.
picknowpaylater 25 Apr 22:23 how do you build a bank up to maximise profits without your biggest bets being losing ones?Your biggest bets being losing ones doesn't have much to do with building up a bank. As your stakes increase, both your wi
I have one bet only per day maximum, some days none if i don't fancy anything.
Price range anything upto around 4/1 biggest price, normally around 1/1 to 6/4.
Only back horses.
Have had longest win run of 8 and longest losing run of 6
Strike Rate normally around 60-70% .
What i did last time was applied 10% bank to each bet which was great on winning run but blew most of it on losing run of 6. Biggest bet during that period was a loser and the next 5 losers cost me most of the money i'd build up
Any advice Scotbet?
ScotbetI have one bet only per day maximum, some days none if i don't fancy anything.Price range anything upto around 4/1 biggest price, normally around 1/1 to 6/4. Only back horses.Have had longest win run of 8 and longest losing run of 6Strike Rate
picknowpaylater Bigger the edge the more aggresive I would become in my betting though I think starting a 10% is way too high
your bets at extreme points are EVENS and a s/r of 60% - pretty good! are you confident thst you can hold these minimums?
If so then , I bet with a base of 2.5% increasing .2% per losing bet when you get a winner next bet would be back down 1 staking interval only
eg if you've have 3 losers on the trot , then a winner , the 5th bet would be staked at 2.5% + .2% + .2% + .2% - .2%..... ..I read you can go up to 4/1 and to Evs .....surely you can't get many 4/1 winners ...anyway I'd also factor in price phasing also - so in simple terms I'd bet twice as much on an evens chance than a 2/1
picknowpaylater Bigger the edge the more aggresive I would become in my betting though I think starting a 10% is way too high your bets at extreme points are EVENS and a s/r of 60% - pretty good!are you confident thst you can hold these minimums? I
yes had only one 4/1 winner. If i could constantly back 4/1 winners i suppose my stakes would be irrelevant as they would be easier to cover.
Majority of bets where around the evens mark.
Thanks Scotbet yes had only one 4/1 winner. If i could constantly back 4/1 winners i suppose my stakes would be irrelevant as they would be easier to cover.Majority of bets where around the evens mark.