|
By:
Great to see that this thread has reared its ugly head again!
![]() Lex, what's going on, you've still got money to spend! ![]() After a zillion experiments I really don't believe that Martingale works in any form. |
|
By:
The Martingale is a sure fire way of putting you in the work house or queing at food banks with others who have tried it.
|
|
By:
I REMEMBER THE DAYS WHEN I THOUGHT THIS SYSTEM WOULD ANSWER MY MONEY WORRIES ,I THOUGHT HOW CLEVER I WAS TO COME UP WITH IT ,IM STILL SKINT
|
|
By:
The problem with this system is that it fools you into thinking that it works cos it can go right for weeks and weeks. Then all of a sudden it'll go pear-shaped and you'll be having sleepless nights!
Been there, bought the t-shirt! |
|
By:
Hi Shep!
![]() I did start to write a long post about martingale and horses v roulette but I've said it so often that if no one can see it by now (and I've given enough examples!) they never will. pm me if you want. |
|
By:
Lex, I haven't read the entire thread, but am I correct in saying that your system is based on laying favourites after a run of winning favs on the basis that there's never a run of x winning favs?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Roulette tables have no memory.
|
|
By:
Rob.
Yup. the last 4 last night followed by 3 shorties today. if the first 2 win I will start laying ![]() |
|
By:
There are some great random number generators online. I urge anyone that's got the hots for Martingale to look at these so they'll save a fortune.
|
|
By:
The prices are very short, overbet. so I'll start laying them straight away. gulp.
![]() |
|
By:
Lex
Rob. Yup. the last 4 last night followed by 3 shorties today. if the first 2 win I will start laying In that case, good luck. You'll need it. |
|
By:
Dont need luck, just need them matched.
first fav wins but very short (1.42 matched) so no damage done. Next fav will be laid at 2.3 |
|
By:
and a bottle of beer to me.
![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Dont need luck, just need them matched.
But you're arbitrarily laying faves based on previous races which have nothing to do with the one you're then betting in. It's a bit like saying 10 faves in a row have won in the ATP in Miami, so you'll lay Roger Federer if he's playing me, as it's phreeee munny. This isn't a system, unless it's more sophisticated than you're letting on; it's just guesswork. As for Schalke, he must be on the wind up. |
|
By:
Well we're all entitled to our opinion and yours is bollox
as I have repeatedly proved what I'm saying over and over.Perhaps you should have read the entire thread ! - it has everything to do with the past result and its certainly not arbitrary! And here's a hint - tennis isnt actually anything to do with horse racing (or feckin roulette) . its a method not a system. hope that helps. ![]() |
|
By:
Schalke - roulette wheels dont have a 'memory' they have a bias. sometimes.
|
|
By:
Havnt been in a casino for quite sometime, what is generally the table min/max limits on roulette please?
Then using the Martingale when the enevitable long loosing run occurs,how many spins is it before your bet exceeds the table limit? Applying the martingale to anything is bollox,as your bank will not be able to cover the enevitable long loosing run. Trying it on horses,football,tennis or anything still ends up disaster. What is the longest wiining/loosing run on say favourites(horse racing)? Could your bank cover that run? You cant beat the maths for god sake. ps and for the record roulettle wheels have no memory. |
|
By:
Trying it on horses,football,tennis or anything still ends up disaster.
obviously someone else who cannot be bothered to read the thread. ![]() |
|
By:
We'll agree to disagree, Lex. All the best with your 'method', but one has to wonder why you're not upping stakes on this goldmine if you've proven it. Surely you should have left the horse racing markets devoid of people to bet against you after cleaning them out one by one?
(Putting smiley faces at the end of your sentences doesn't make your point more emphatic by the way.) |
|
By:
I'm very happy with my betting levels ta.
Its an exchange Rob, you can't clean them out, thats the point... btw I can't find an 'emphatic' smiley; the nearest one looks like someone with wind. ![]() see what I mean? ![]() |
|
By:
Lex you avoided answering my questions, I wonder why!
Can someone else come up with the answers to help him? |
|
By:
By the way Lex,the result of a previous match,race,event etc has no bearing whatsoever on a future race/match/event.
If 15 favourites won at the tennis would you lay Federer against me is a great example!! |
|
By:
I was in Southend Casino before, playing blackjack when a trampy chinese guy sat down next to me. Playing fivers with Table limits £5-£500.
He used martingale and remember he won about £25 then his loses began to happen, he must have put down £320 7th chance because the dealer pointed to the table limits sign. And he had to sweat on something low like 15 or 16 but was paid off as the dealer bust. As he collected his winning and walked away I thought what a mug, the system couldn't of been working because he was looked like a tramp unless he just clocked off from the local take away. |
|
By:
Thank you Richard I rest my case.
|
|
By:
If the Martingale was a sure fire winner why did the chineese guy skuttle off sweating rather than taking the casino to the cleaners?
Because the penny dropped it doesnt work. Thanks Richard for your contribution. |
|
By:
Bet 1 - £2
Bet 2 - £4 Bet 3 - £8 Bet 4 - £16 (Phew!) Bet 5 - £32 (Cmon, I'm getting stressed!) Bet 6 - £64 (I don't believe it!) Bet 7 - £128 (Surely this time...) Bet 8 - £256 (It's Saturday night and all your mates wanna know why you're not being very sociable!) Bet 9 - £512 (If this doesn't win I'm gonna kill myself!) You can't afford bet 10! ![]() |
|
By:
A martingale is any of a class of betting strategies that originated from and were popular in 18th century France. source wiki
It's been around that long and still no martingale millionaires. |
|
By:
There are probably a few Martingale millionaires around. However, all of them were billionaires before they started.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
thank u sheppy enough said. lex never did answer.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
That is very correct. But demonstrating how Martingale on a perfect system like a roulette wheel with very defined probabilities only serves to demonstrate that no staking strategy can perfectly beat the system. You need the long-term value picks too. If that's what you're picking, then it shouldn't matter what staking system you use.
Martingale is a completely flawed system used by those naive enough to think it works, or by mugs, imvho. I hope you're the former, and that your picks are good enough for you. Good luck with it, but it's not for me in the slightest. |
|
By:
It is flawed in certain aspects as described with the games it it is generally associated with, but applied to different methods it can actually be very profitable ...
|