get turf tv in homes people paying for it whinge that its only 2 seconds ahead on RUK ruk delay their transmission to keep big money ponces happy lesson not learnt from SIS / ATR Extra greed/shambles that irreversibly affected a bouyant in running markets greed greed greed , ruins everything , human nature but can't see the wood for thew trees ffs i told myself not to moan, must punish oneself with nipple clamps
get turf tv in homespeople paying for it whinge that its only 2 seconds ahead on RUKruk delay their transmission to keep big money ponces happylesson not learnt from SIS / ATR Extra greed/shambles that irreversibly affected a bouyant in running marke
If this got off the ground they would need to add another sec onto RUk to disadvantage regular punters and amke it worthwhile
here we go , told ya
Great Whyte 16 Feb 16:52 If this got off the ground they would need to add another sec onto RUk to disadvantage regular punters and amke it worthwhile here we go , told ya
If Home Turf was a guaranteed 4 secs in front of RUK that would screw regular punters enuff to make it worth paying SIS rates
yes and screw 1000s of geniune punters paying £20 a month for RUK, and fck liquidity even more in running you will end up playing with yourselfs for buttons,
Great Whyte 16 Feb 16:55 If Home Turf was a guaranteed 4 secs in front of RUK that would screw regular punters enuff to make it worth paying SIS rates yes and screw 1000s of geniune punters paying £20 a month for RUK, and fck liquidity even more
Maybe RUK could delay pics further and put them 20 sces behind live and charge extra extra for Home TurfTV. In that way even a newcomer with deep pockets could fleece people
Maybe RUK could delay pics further and put them 20 sces behind live and charge extra extra for Home TurfTV. In that way even a newcomer with deep pockets could fleece people
sorry m8 i don't know anything about turf only it would seem it has less advantage over ruk tham sis has over atr, meaning dissadvantaged punters are screwed less playing ruk, but obviously there are those that would love to have turf at home and delay ruk so as they can ruin the whole in running structure even more than the greedy fcks already have
kingofthedirt 16 Feb 16:56 MST. Is RUK still only 0.5 sec behind TurfTV? sorry m8 i don't know anything about turf only it would seem it has less advantage over ruk tham sis has over atr, meaning dissadvantaged punters are screwed less playing ru
Desperate times for some of u guys............shame
desperate is canvassing for a service that doesn't exist so as you can pay £1000s for a 0.75 sec advantage
mkay 16 Feb 17:06 Desperate times for some of u guys............shame desperate is canvassing for a service that doesn't exist so as you can pay £1000s for a 0.75 sec advantage
not really manchester if u can make it pay then fair play. if your no good anyway pack it in, im just asking a simple question. No greed involved, business is business
not really manchester if u can make it pay then fair play. if your no good anyway pack it in, im just asking a simple question. No greed involved, business is business
Home Turf .75 sec faster than RUK - £50 a month 2 secs faster..................£500 3 secs faster..................£750 5 sces faster.................£1,500
Even at 5 secs faster than RUK its only a nifty a day and you woul be 100 yards in front of your average RUK viewer which should be enuff for even the more modestly talented IR shrewdies B-)
MST. This is how it should be priced upHome Turf .75 sec faster than RUK - £50 a month 2 secs faster..................£500 3 secs faster..................£750 5 sces faster.................£1,500Ev