General Betting
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Trying to get a list together for serious in running punters who are willing to pay for Turf TV at home sorted.
Are you interested?
How much you willing to pay?
Please, just serious replies.
If there is enough interest, hopefully Turf TV will be willing.
Are you interested?
How much you willing to pay?
Please, just serious replies.
If there is enough interest, hopefully Turf TV will be willing.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 18
|
By:
this is all we need yet more greed undermining the in running eco system-memo to self don't moan on this thread
|
|
By:
get turf tv in homes
people paying for it whinge that its only 2 seconds ahead on RUK ruk delay their transmission to keep big money ponces happy lesson not learnt from SIS / ATR Extra greed/shambles that irreversibly affected a bouyant in running markets greed greed greed , ruins everything , human nature but can't see the wood for thew trees ffs i told myself not to moan, must punish oneself with nipple clamps |
|
By:
If this got off the ground they would need to add another sec onto RUk to disadvantage regular punters and amke it worthwhile.
|
|
By:
Great Whyte 16 Feb 16:52
If this got off the ground they would need to add another sec onto RUk to disadvantage regular punters and amke it worthwhile here we go , told ya |
|
By:
If Home Turf was a guaranteed 4 secs in front of RUK that would screw regular punters enuff to make it worth paying SIS rates.
|
|
By:
MST. Is RUK still only 0.5 sec behind TurfTV?
|
|
By:
Great Whyte 16 Feb 16:55
If Home Turf was a guaranteed 4 secs in front of RUK that would screw regular punters enuff to make it worth paying SIS rates yes and screw 1000s of geniune punters paying £20 a month for RUK, and fck liquidity even more in running you will end up playing with yourselfs for buttons, |
|
By:
ask 2 simple questions and get other **e instead
|
|
By:
Maybe RUK could delay pics further and put them 20 sces behind live and charge extra extra for Home TurfTV. In that way even a newcomer with deep pockets could fleece people
|
|
By:
kingofthedirt 16 Feb 16:56
MST. Is RUK still only 0.5 sec behind TurfTV? sorry m8 i don't know anything about turf only it would seem it has less advantage over ruk tham sis has over atr, meaning dissadvantaged punters are screwed less playing ruk, but obviously there are those that would love to have turf at home and delay ruk so as they can ruin the whole in running structure even more than the greedy fcks already have |
|
By:
mkay. What kind of time differential would there be between TurfTv and RUK. This is the be all and end all. Answer that and you will get your answers.
|
|
By:
about 0.75 to my knowledge
|
|
By:
Any chance you can get it up to 4/5 secs mate?
|
|
By:
Desperate times for some of u guys............shame
|
|
By:
mkay 16 Feb 17:06
Desperate times for some of u guys............shame desperate is canvassing for a service that doesn't exist so as you can pay £1000s for a 0.75 sec advantage |
|
By:
Not really but .75 secs isn't very enticing.I'd say if u can get a full 3 secs between TurfTv and RUK then you would have 100,s of takers
|
|
By:
not really manchester if u can make it pay then fair play. if your no good anyway pack it in, im just asking a simple question. No greed involved, business is business
|
|
By:
MST. This is how it should be priced up
Home Turf .75 sec faster than RUK - £50 a month 2 secs faster..................£500 3 secs faster..................£750 5 sces faster.................£1,500 Even at 5 secs faster than RUK its only a nifty a day and you woul be 100 yards in front of your average RUK viewer which should be enuff for even the more modestly talented IR shrewdies B-) |