Forums

General Betting

Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
scrooge_mcduck
26 Jan 10 19:16
Joined:
Date Joined: 24 Apr 08
| Topic/replies: 899 | Blogger: scrooge_mcduck's blog
I know it is genrally advised to stake 1-2% 5% max on each bet when level staking but is this not too low?

Surely if you have more than 10 losers in a row you should rethink your strategy and would find it extremely hard to get back in profit anwyay?
Pause • Switch to Standard View % of bank to stake
Show More
Loading...
Report dlarssonf • January 26, 2010 8:02 PM GMT
it is better to have ten losers in a row and survive , than 2 losers in a row and wipe out your bank
Report Glengarry Glen Ross • January 26, 2010 8:04 PM GMT


scrooge_mcduck 26 Jan 20:16
I know it is genrally advised to stake 1-2% 5% max on each bet when level staking but is this not too low?

Surely if you have more than 10 losers in a row you should rethink your strategy and would find it extremely hard to get back in profit anwyay?





dlarssonf 26 Jan 21:02
it is better to have ten losers in a row and survive , than 2 losers in a row and wipe out your bank


Every now and again something comes along, good shout m8
Report joshuag • January 27, 2010 3:47 PM GMT
"Surely if you have more than 10 losers in a row you should rethink your strategy "

For most pro punters 10 losers in a row is quite usual, 20 will hapopoen at least once a year. Of course tha ability to handle it and not as you say rethink your strategy is why they survive as pro punters.
Report catfloppo • January 27, 2010 6:12 PM GMT
Hey Josh. Please don't think I'm being rude, I am genuinely interested because I see posts like this all the time. How do you know what most pro punters do?
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com