Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

General Betting

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 82 comments are related to the topic:
BANNED

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 82
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 19 Jan 10 14:16
We can only pray that betfair recognise that ill feeling and let the traders and **s go back to paying 5% of their profits. Either that or get shot of them altogether.
By:
Blessington
When: 19 Jan 10 14:20
FECK......I NEVER TRADED in my life..... :0

I come from a little county in Ireland called KERRY who just happen to win our football championship 4 out of the last 5 years and i guess I put too much money on them here.

I'm also on FULL 5% Commission

This year they won at 11/2 B-) and thats probably the only reason I'm paying Premiun Charges now.
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 19 Jan 10 14:23
I apologise then Blessington. You should watch the forum company you keep though.
By:
Blessington
When: 19 Jan 10 14:37
FECK....I don't know about you I rather see one innocent man go free than 10 guilty ones been locked up.

At the moment I would say the PC hits 1 trader (not that i have anything against them) for 10 innocent punters........CRAZY

You only have to look at the other exchange to see that. As few would say if you were a trader or a fast picture merchant (that you have such a problem) with they would choose to go over there with its low liquildy.

The only guy I've come across over there are pretty much a 100% up front and just got caught up in this riduclous PC and is now left with the no brainer of a 23% commission rate here when they do win or 5% over the other side.

If it wasn't for the forum here I wouldn't even bother checking out this site anymore. I used to LOVE the place. ;( ....Cheers
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 19 Jan 10 14:49
At the moment I would say the PC hits 1 trader (not that i have anything against them) for 10 innocent punters........CRAZY

If you believe that Blessington then CRAZY is the operative word. I would guess 99% of those paying it were previously freeloaders. I don't think the pc was how they should've been made to pay ( generally LESS than their fair share) but it was lunacy to have the liquidity providers subsidising the parasites.
By:
Blessington
When: 19 Jan 10 17:16
FECK,......MOVE ON. You used to be a guy ahead of the pack now your behind the rest of us.

Fast pictues was a big thing 2+ years ago now everybody who wants them has them available.

Even in little old Ireland who just got a boll0xing off the EU or somebody for falling behind on internet technology. You can go to a race meeting in the @rse hole of the country you will see the guy with his Blackberry going watching the races. Usually the local parish priest. :^0

Annybody getting caught now by that NOW, has only themsleves to blame for either been too mean to pay out for it themselves or too lazy to go to a shop where they have it.

Likewise there is literally 1000s of guys now with fast pictures so anyone making any money from them now has a lot to share it around with. :0

So if I was you I stop worrying about them and go back to what you use to be good at looking after the small man in the street who getting r1pped off and its not by fast pictures or trading its by such as by companies who are opearting in markets with no opposition and charging what they like to guys who were just as much responsible for their success as anything the shareholder ever did for the company. B-)

People getting caught out now by fast pictures are History or just some sort of DINOCERAS. I reckon you wouldn't get 1.01 on NOT finding anybody on the Racing Forum who hasn't heard of fast pictures by now ...Cheers
By:
The Betfairy
When: 19 Jan 10 17:27
Please can you tell me where and how to get the fast pictures.
By:
paddys revenge
When: 19 Jan 10 17:43
Blessington where in Kerry are you from?
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 19 Jan 10 18:20
Sorry Blessington, after reading that post I find it hard to believe there's anyone behind you.
By:
Blessington
When: 19 Jan 10 19:12
FECK.....COME ON!...... Smart minds and all that.

You think the average Betfairian needs nearly 3 years to figure out a guy at the races with a Blackberry is faster than the guy sitting in his house watching Channel 4.

Or that the average Betfairian when he see's the prices change during a tennis match or golf tournament and it just happens its the guy who wins the point a fraction of a second later. He just puts it down as somebody constantly hitting lucky.....

Our Smart minds are not as slow as that..... Most of us sometime wish they were :^0

Anyway if you read the Racing Post enough of their reporters have now tried it out fast pictures and all. They still couldn't manage to win they all came back with the same conclusion fast pictures or not its gone way to competitive now to just hope a fast picture will put you on the road to riches.

I'm sure Tennis and golf is gone the same. Not that I ever understood the advantage in golf with a tournament running 4 long days.......Cheers
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 19 Jan 10 19:27
You overestimate your species Blessington.
By:
"Stringer" Bell
When: 19 Jan 10 19:51
A lot of people know they are behind on the pictures but dont have the discipline to stop playing.
By:
Blessington
When: 19 Jan 10 20:10
Yeah but thats a different problem....But as the Racing Post guys showed just because you might be a few secs ahead doesn't necessary mean you still will do the right thing. Especially when you know all your colleagues are seen the same things happen.

I often put a bet on after the off before in-running after the favourite started slow but I still never got it right.

One day I was betting a hour after the off in 2 ball golf betting and still got cleaned out.

Its a myth there is any easy way of making money betting.

Hard work or nothing imo and avoid paying extra commission to the PC when the same odds are available elsewhere. Would be my strategy for success.....Cheers
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 20 Jan 10 07:34
Blessington, the slow pic players lose heavily overall to the fast pic players. The fact that some fast pic players are slow of mind does not change that fact. What is this crusade you're on anyway?
By:
Blessington
When: 20 Jan 10 09:14
FECK anybody who loses because of fast pictures now 3 years on have only themselves to blame.

Fast picture are OLD NEWS now. You can open a forum without somebody asking for a exchange shop or somebody asking the fastest site for pictures. The Racing Post is full of reporters given them a go as a feature report.

I just wonder why you think the average guy on Betfair is so stup1d now that 3 years on he still hasn't figure out somebody at the races with a high tec phone is going to be quicker to see whats happening than him sitting at home waiting for pictures to be beamed into his house.

Likewise at a tennis match. How long is it now since those professional gamblers who were ex bookies decided to fly to Australia to bet from court side? I think it 4 years or even more. Again the Racing Post did a feature on one of them who died last year.

Funny thing was the guy was after stopping it a few years ago when he said too many were at it.

So agenda I just wonder why you think the average fast mind on here needs 3-4 years to realise a guy at the races or a guy in a exchange shop or just some TV provider like it says in the corner of the screen on every betting event.

That some of them might be providing picture to you slower than somebody else and thats why a price shortens just before something good happens to the bet not because that layer has found some divine insight.........

I just don't understand why you feel 3-4 years on after exchange shops first opened that your breaking some sort of News now telling us that the guy in there paying a £100 a week or whatever is using SIS pictures (or bookies pictures) whichever you like, are recieving them 2-3 seconds ahead of the guy watching ATR or RUK.

COME ON! Its Betfair sharp minds your talking too and on a Betfair forum where it has been covered everyday for the last 3-4 years.......MOVE ON give us something NEW now.

Like how many 5% commission PUNTERS like me now end up paying Premiun Charges just because we followed a successful team, or horse, or because we just increased our normal bet which was successful, or we're just on here too long now to lose enough....

Now that would be positive news for most of us joe soaps and what FECK of old would have been hitting us with......Cheers
....................................................................


PS, Didn't you have £10k on Celtic a few years ago? You couldn't do that now with the PC could you?
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 20 Jan 10 13:17
FECK anybody who loses because of fast pictures now 3 years on have only themselves to blame.

No they don't. Do cripples deserve to have their crutches kicked from under them just because they venture outdoors?


I just wonder why you think the average guy on Betfair is so stup1d now that 3 years on he still hasn't figure out somebody at the races with a high tec phone is going to be quicker to see whats happening than him sitting at home waiting for pictures to be beamed into his house.

Because if they weren't stupid there'd be little point in anyone going to the races with their high tec phone.


I just don't understand why you feel 3-4 years on after exchange shops first opened that your breaking some sort of News now telling us that the guy in there paying a £100 a week or whatever is using SIS pictures (or bookies pictures) whichever you like, are recieving them 2-3 seconds ahead of the guy watching ATR or RUK.

Where did I suggest I was making a revelation to anyone on here?


COME ON! Its Betfair sharp minds your talking too

Where?


Like how many 5% commission PUNTERS like me now end up paying Premiun Charges just because we followed a successful team, or horse, or because we just increased our normal bet which was successful, or we're just on here too long now to lose enough....

Very few I'd have said although I've ever sympathy with anyone who finds themselves in that position. Maybe if they'd joined the campaign to get rid of the regular pc parasites we'd have been spared the parasite tax (and the inevitable government one).


Now that would be positive news for most of us joe soaps and what FECK of old would have been hitting us with......Cheers

I just don't understand why you feel that two years on I would waste my time on the subject of beating the parasite charge when it's been raised and discussed so many times by "sharp minds".
By:
chrisblues
When: 20 Jan 10 14:26
parasite parasite parasite parasite what this feck just give up
By:
Blessington
When: 20 Jan 10 14:39
FECK....More guys are going to get hit by the EFFECTS of the PREMIUN CHARGES than will lose to fast pictures now.

Have you looked around you? Can you ever remember Tennis Markets during the Australian Open without a bet up on them. Such as in the Tennis Specials.

Have you ever remembered a Golf Market and a prinipal one at that the US Money lists with no bets up on it.

Or the highlight of the Rugby Union Club season the Heineken Cup Outright market where the other exchange has 4 times the total matched on it.

Or a Horse Racing market such as the Order of Merit or the All Weather top Jockey market where the books are running at which are running 5 months with less than £1 k matched between them. There the obivious ones and I could go on and on.

The facts are there the PC whether your paying it or not is now killing good prices and competitve markets. Look at the Golf Outright markets the exchange with so called no liquildty is now better price on most golfers.

Premiun Charges are killing the game here for both payer of PC and non payer of PC and fast pictures and all the other sh1te has little or no effect on the average Joe soap here compared to what the PC charge is doing.

Who cares whether it was aimed or not aimed at a particular style of punter on here or one thing for sure any advantage a fast picture merchant had in the past is now surely long gone. With so many others betting that way ...... Cheers
By:
Super Hanzz
When: 20 Jan 10 15:01
http://pplace.forumotion.com/chit-chat-f8/

is where most of the chitchat banned go
By:
The Investor
When: 20 Jan 10 15:07
Someone need to take up the baton from Tony and make a full time career out of entering into discussion with Feck, where each party continuously rephrases the same arguments and no-one ever changes their stance even in the slightest :D
By:
The Investor
When: 20 Jan 10 15:08
I like your 'betfair babes' idea by the way ;)
By:
Blessington
When: 20 Jan 10 15:22
INVESTOR........You NEVER BEAT THE IRISH :^0 ...... No SURRENDER. B-)
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 20 Jan 10 15:56
Premiun Charges are killing the game here for both payer of PC and non payer of PC and fast pictures and all the other sh1te has little or no effect on the average Joe soap here compared to what the PC charge is doing.

The average joe soap is untouched by the pc and the only "liquidity" it's killing is of the ticket tout kind apart from the odd "fun bet" placed elsewhere by the "sharp minded" pc payers who aren't sharp enough to understand how the pc works.
By:
The Investor
When: 20 Jan 10 16:24
Feck do you agree that an increase in traders would not do any harm to the exchange?
Of course it's annoying when someone jumps in front of your large bets by a tiny increment with £2, but if 1000 traders were doing this and outbidding each other, the only possible effect is increased efficiency.
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 20 Jan 10 17:35
Investor, are you seriously suggesting that if 1,000 new horse racing traders joined betfair I'd only have to stick up a £2 lay of a horse in order to get a 2K back on it covered?

If 1,000 people suddenly decided to become ticket touts, do you think I'd only have to stand in an empty ticket queue to guarantee a concert the sale of a 1,000 tickets?
By:
Blessington
When: 20 Jan 10 18:57

The average joe soap is untouched by the pc


Feck the African golf market last week was running at 330% I've never seen so uncompetitive markets on Betfair......

There is no competition any more when it comes to putting up prices on some events.

That were punters are now getting r1pped off. No body around to force the layer out or chase the business. Guys know now with so few still around they can just sit on their hands and let the punter move their bets in to meet theirs.

Anyway I was reading in one of the betting mags that a bookmaker will soon put up a LAY button on their site......That surely be good news for everybody...In a few years time they be asking what was the PC on their quiz games.... :^0
By:
The Investor
When: 20 Jan 10 22:21
No Feck, that's not what I mean.

What I mean is that it is healthy for the exchange if many people are outbidding each other and profit margins are slim for the traders / gamblers / market makers.



In markets with low liquidity I attempt to make money by offering 'bad value' bets. Occasionally these will get matched and I will make a profit, although the risk is larger, as I may not be able to trade out if things go against me.

In markets with very high liquidity, I can make much more. As I bet almost exclusively on football this would be World Cup, Champions League Finals etc. This is because I can take large risk, and if I feel the market is out of line I can bet big and trade out quickly if things screw up.

You would expect prices to be more accurate with more liquidity. While this seems to be the case, it is also true that you can churn through far more bets. Smaller margins, but higher profits.
By:
The Investor
When: 20 Jan 10 22:23
Blessington 20 Jan 20:57
[...]
Anyway I was reading in one of the betting mags that a bookmaker will soon put up a LAY button on their site......That surely be good news for everybody...In a few years time they be asking what was the PC on their quiz games.... :^0


That's interesting. Wonder how that will work out.
By:
Moon Light
When: 21 Jan 10 02:22
They tried this a few years ago. It seemed to peter out, the prices they offered were atrocious.
They also started their own exchange. That petered out too.
There is absolutely no limit to their hypocrisy.
By:
beetle
When: 21 Jan 10 05:55
Surely that would create an arb on every market?
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 21 Jan 10 08:09
Blessington, are you saying the market makers prefer nothing to 85%s of their old profits or that people who are unaffected by the pc aren't accomodating the market makers because they think they might get hit with the pc? Neither seems likely imo. Re the bookmaker's lay button, I think you're delusional if you think anyone out there (including other exchanges) are desperate to attract people who are willing to give them 5% of their profits but will whinge and bad mouth them if they have to pay any more than that.


Investor, there are very few price aware traders which is why the early liquidity is so bad. Most want to bet in high liquidity markets and, since the spread is already tight in these, I fail to see how adding another 1,000 middlemen would improve liquidity. In such markets the true backers and layers would match each other in the absence of traders.
By:
beetle
When: 21 Jan 10 11:02
Feck N. Eejit

"there are very few price aware traders" !!

I diont agree. Sure there are traders running formulaic bots but even these are programmed according to observation of prices and hence they are price aware. I am not one of these.

Most other traders making any money are highly price aware. It is the essence of trading - backing or laying a selection because they have taken a view about a future price. Essentially this type of trader is a postion taker in the same way that you are but who chose to adjust their postition to lock in a profit or loss.
By:
Blessington
When: 21 Jan 10 11:09
FECK....Lots of bookies would be delighted to open their doors every morning known that they were guarnteed to make 5% on EVERY market. Especially if they thought they could reach anywhere like Betfair turnover.

Its whether these Bookies want somebody else to lay certain losers based on their own intelligence network they have set up in some stable yards, or from certain owners betting accounts is a different question. :^0 ......Cheers
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 21 Jan 10 14:16
beetle, I'm talking about having their own opinion of what an outcome's true probability is, not whether they think the market is going to move a certain way due to queue info. If they were all price aware (in my sense) and really did supply liquidity they'd all be supplying it over at the purple site and paying only 200% of what they do here. There again, if betfair thought they were liquidity providers they would never have risked alienating them.

Blessington, betfair would be ecstatic if they could make 5% on their turnover on every market. Give it up.
By:
Blessington
When: 21 Jan 10 15:02
FECK.....HA HA, your playing with words.

5% off every winning bet in EVERY MARKET. :)
By:
Moon Light
When: 21 Jan 10 15:27
Feck, you're not paying attention to what The Investor said. Like most successful traders, he has an opinion about the true price, and takes a position based on it.
He expects the market to correct over time.
I'd be surprised if many traded successfully based on the queue. It is full of spoofers.
Most traders agree that WoM is no longer significant.
By:
beetle
When: 21 Jan 10 16:06
Feck

if you think most traders take a position based on queue information you are just living your own reality which is far away from the real world

Anyone that bases trades on queue information loses.
By:
beetle
When: 21 Jan 10 16:19
looses
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 21 Jan 10 17:13
You were right first time beetle, it's 'loses'.

I'd be amazed if even a minute fraction of horse race traders had their own tissue. I daresay there will be more in the sports market where odds compiling is micky mouse.

You'll be telling me next that Adam Heathcote is up all night studying form. Give me a fkng break.
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 21 Jan 10 17:16
Incidentally, do you think wom is all that's available in the interface?
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com