Forums

General Betting

Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
CLYDEBANK29
15 Dec 09 18:05
Joined:
Date Joined: 10 Jan 02
| Topic/replies: 15,385 | Blogger: CLYDEBANK29's blog
A bag has 2 red balls and 2 black balls. If 2 balls are picked at random the chances are 66.7% that the balls are different colours. My 10yo son was convinced it was 50/50 so I challenged him to a free bet, takind two red and two silver baubles off the xmas tree and putting them into a bag.

I then gave him 5 £1 coins and myself 5 £1 coins. Every time the 2 baubles were different colours
he gave me £1 and every time they were the same colour I gave him £1. The winner was the first person to get all 10 £1 coins which they then kept. Can someone tell me what were his chances of winning?
Pause Switch to Standard View Maths problem
Show More
Loading...
Report Little one December 15, 2009 6:13 PM GMT
It's a 1 in 6 chance isn't it?
Report Hayden December 15, 2009 6:19 PM GMT
would rather be on your side CLYDEBANK tbh seeing as every draw you're chance is 1.5 compared your son's 3.0.
Report A treeeemendous machiiine December 15, 2009 6:32 PM GMT
very slim imo, worked out from 5-0 to 8-3 and the chances of those 4 results add up to about 1.4%. looking at the direction of the figures chance of winning can't be much higher than 4%
Report I am the one and only223 December 15, 2009 6:33 PM GMT
3%
Report bushy December 15, 2009 6:55 PM GMT
3% is correct (more precisely 3.03recurring, or 1/33), but I don't have a mathematical proof as to why.

The problem is a 1-dimensional random walk, with p = 2/3, and with sticky boundaries.
Report Richard LL December 15, 2009 6:57 PM GMT
I hope he spends the money wisely CB.
Report bushy December 15, 2009 7:03 PM GMT
From the central position, the chance of 5-0 is 32/243 and the chance of 0-5 is 1/243, which indicates the 32:1 ratio of winning that I found by exhaustive calculation.

What I am struggling to do is to explain why this ratio is the actual result, as after 5 trials the distribution of outcomes is biased away from this central position.
Report CLYDEBANK29 December 15, 2009 7:10 PM GMT
cheers bushy and others.
Report Glasgow Brian December 15, 2009 7:12 PM GMT
bushy
you sound like mr logic out of the viz
Report Eldrick December 15, 2009 9:33 PM GMT
Write total bank as B, set constant stake at 1, bet pays even money so at each step bank moves up 1 with prob p, down 1 with prob (1-p)=q

Say you stop after your bank reaches some amount W

Now let R_B = Pr(Funds reach W before they reach 0, given current bank B)

Then we have to solve

R_B = q * R_(B+1) + p * R_(B-1) (***)

With boundary conditions R_0 = 0 and R_W = 1

Try solution R_B = A * k ^ B (A, k constant)

Substitute into (***) to get quadratic in k, two solutions. Substitute B=0, W to find constants

Gives

R_B = ( 1 - ( q / p ) ^ B ) / ( 1 - ( q / p ) ^ W )

(Note p = q is a special case, working comes out a little different, R_B = B / W)

In your case p = 2/3, B = 5, W = 10
Report jfc December 15, 2009 9:52 PM GMT
I ~concur with Mr Bushy

0.030303030303030303

using a spreadsheet solution
Report Big Charlie December 15, 2009 10:00 PM GMT
I just played with two jacks and two queens from a deck of cards.

5 points each at start

same - different
5-5
4-6
3-7
2-8
3-7
4-6
3-7
2-8
1-9
2-8
1-9
0-10
Report Contrarian December 15, 2009 10:01 PM GMT
Apologies to Eldrick if this is just a long-winded version of his method, but you could do this:

Get a series of 9 equations relating the probabilities of winning from the various scores. Eg:

P(win from 9-1) = 1/3 + (2/3 * P(win from 8-2)
P(win from 8-2) = 1/3 * P(win from 9-1) + (2/3 * P(win from 7-3)

etc.

and then just solve them simultaneously. (There are 9 equations and 9 unknowns).
Report I am the one and only223 December 16, 2009 10:18 AM GMT
I'm not familiar with any high falutin' maths stuff, so apologies for the kitchen sink approach!

Contrarian, I have the equations as:
(where P(91) = prob of winning from 9-1 ahead)

P(91)=2/3 + 1/3 P(82)
P(82)=2/3 P(91)+1/3 P(73)
...
P(28)=2/3 P(37) + 1/3 P(19)
P(19)=2/3 P(28)

Substituting back up:
P(28)=2/3 P(37) + 2/9 P(28)
P(28)=6 P(37)/7

And now there's a series where the next calc=2pd/2pd +1 where pd=previous denominator.
So P(37)=14(P46)/15 ...

Until P(91)=1022/1023

So P(55) ( the calc for winning from 5-5) is
1022/1023*
510/511*
254/255*
126/127*
62/63

which=32/33
Report Eldrick December 16, 2009 4:31 PM GMT
same solution basically

when W = 2B you can rewrite the denominator as difference of two squares, then simplify to get:

R_B = 1 / ( 1 + ( q / p ) ^ B )

q/p = 1/2 and B = 5 gives:

R_5 = 1 / (1 + (1/2)^5) = 32/33 = 0.03030303...
Report starship December 17, 2009 9:39 AM GMT
the chances of two reds being pulled out is ....16.66.....5/1
thge cnances of two blues being pulled out....16.66......5/1
the chances of two odds balls being poulled out is.......66.66....1/2
the chances of any matched coloured balls being pulled out is 33.33 2/1
Report Eldrick December 17, 2009 7:16 PM GMT
1. did your maths teacher never tell you to spend an insanely excessive amount of time reading the question before you picked up your pen?

2. i'm going to lay you 10/1 about two blue balls coming out, because i think you're special. how much would you like?
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com