Football
There are currently 2 people viewing this thread.
These 105 comments are related to the topic:
Liverpool vs the tainted financial cheats
Liverpool vs the tainted financial cheats
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 105
|
By:
Let us be honest here,Leicester fluked it because nobody took them seriously until it was too late,TTT
|
|
By:
you can only beat whats put infront of you. and they did.
|
|
By:
The commission didn't find that City's sponsorship was really 119m, they found that that was what the sponsors actually paid. Not the same thing. They found that the owners made up the balance and that was effectively an equity injection and not revenue as it was disguised as. The FFP rules are all based on revenue. When it comes to punishing City the 119m figure is used to assess how much they broke the rules by as that is the only genuine revenue they got from sponsors. The sponsorship was prob worth 500m+ in real market value terms but that's not what they actually got from sponsors.
|
|
By:
Iron hoof supporting cheats and blowing Greeks.
|
|
By:
good thread, lets not get personal
|
|
By:
Homophobic insults now,you pitiful ponce
|
|
By:
Not homophobic, I've no problem with irons singing about blowing bubbles, if that's their boat
Just your cockney slang, innit And you started the abuse 24karat,lol |
|
By:
 |
|
By:
You have to wonder about today.
I mean... Richard Masters was no doubt dreaming about City turning up at the red half of Merseyside today and getting a right caning. Instead the City bus avoids the assembled LFC knuckleheads by taking a back road. And the home team are so poor they get hammered. Even the famous Kop banners are full of quotations from Oasis songs. As no band from Liverpool have been relevant since The Las made their one and only album in 1987. Unless you count the Zutons. Which no one in their right mind is. And the greatest irony of all is that if Liv fans get their way and City's titles get stripped (from the years up to 2018) then the League title pecking order reads.. United 22 Liv 21. Bow down to your Manchester Overlords.. |
|
By:
I understand that City have possibly/probably transgressed the financial rules as per the Premier League ...
I assume these rules are in place to stop Team X buying all the best players in the world, so as to keep the League competitive? Do these same rules apply to PSG, Barca, Real Madrid in their respective leagues? I genuinely don't know....also if not, would that not make them unfairly strong in the European Cup competitions? |
|
By:
https://www.alltimescores.com/en/football/news/fan-guides/how-footballs-financial-rules-actually-work-psr-scr-and-ffp-explained
.. |
|
By:
Thelatarps obviously fishing and on the wind up here, defending a bunch of frauds. Not the players fault of course but justice for the crooked behaviour of the club cannot come soon enough.
Far be it for me to defend the Reds but there was nothing in the game until the sending off. City had 4 shots on target, 3 were the goals all of which came after the dismissal. So they were well on top for the last half hour, but against ten men of course Well done on City sneaking in without being seen, a metaphor for the last two decades i'd say  btw, why do you think the banners quoted Oasis songs ffs ? Duh ! |
|
By:
Cheers, yhtl
That's not a light read |
|
By:
Yeah, it's pretty comprehensive, and
whilst top leagues have their own versions of rules, there's the 70% UEFA that is stricter than premier league rules. |
|
By:
Well tighter, maybe stricter is wrong word there.
|
|
By:
well they paid a national league club £1 million for a player not done again until this year. Good signing though !
|
|
By:
well said Dixie
|
|
By:
History would've been a complete different animal if liverpool had accepted the dic offer back in 2007 and done a 'city'. Instead of taking on the poisoned duo of hicks n gillett
Klopp fanzine mag 'Der Spiegel' would've just hushed up all of the allegations under the carpet and any shenanigans wouldvd never seen the light of day. Who knows.. we could all been talkin about liverpool the Quad winners, playing in their new, brand new spanking stadium. Instead of them still playing in evertons hand me down, getting beat 3-0 at home. Oh well, never mind. |
|
By:
chelsea give salah and KDB away
rodri was bought after one season with ATHLETICO david silva had been out on loan twice when city bought him bernard silva was on loan at monaco they were there for others to go and get,would they have thrived at other epl clubs |
|
By:
Any Liverpool fans question the keeper? I thought he could've done better. One shot was not in the corner, one nowhere near it (admittedly hard shots) and one went underneath him. I realise Pool were weakened through injury, and that the harsh sending off left them with an uphill task.
|
|
By:
Might have got the last one,
Got to be lucky to save haaland shot, Doku placed it where he wasn't getting it |
|
By:
David Silva was on loan as a 19/20 yo, 4 years before he joined City. Bernardo Silva was on a 1 year loan at Monaco 2 years before he signed for City. Monaco made the deal permanent after 6 months of the loan.
They weren't all there for the taking, Pep was a major draw for any player and they only had Pep because of the cheating. |
|
By:
https://x.com/barlowjacob/status/2109686442901320165?s=20
Hope it isn't AI, but here's Jamie Carragher, a few years ago, explaining he would 'rather cheat and win' rather than 'not winning' Seems a bit hypocritical after his stance over the past 7 days |
|
By:
well wearing the TEE SHIRT aying suarez is innocent wasnt AI
and nevo threatening england team management with a players strike unless WIO caught jumping out of a toilet window to escape a drugs test wasnt reinstated in to team/squad, wasnt AI either |
|
By:
what on earth has any of that to do with the huge financial doping by cheaty
Yes cheaty bought well so what? |
|
By:
lol, that might be AI, but if not, at least he was being honest. Man City are not even being honest about being cheats...
|