Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
hunt lunt and cunningham
18 Feb 26 20:44
Joined:
Date Joined: 18 Jun 02
| Topic/replies: 4,093 | Blogger: hunt lunt and cunningham's blog
Nothing against the lad, and I know about market forces etc and I'm sure he is a great guy, but let's be honest here...£300,000 a week, that's more than most working people would earn in 6/7 years! I'm obviously a lot older than most of you guys on here but I'm sure he is not as good as  Best, Charlton Greaves, and many more from a golden era.I personally wouldn't have him Arsenal's team with the likes of Henri, Pires Bergkamp, Overmars etc . Maybe it's the rose tinted glasses....

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 52
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 18 Feb 26 20:51
Saka was one of best players in country before his injury, and hopefully
gets back to full fitness soon.

15million a year, who can you get for better with no fee?

How much would those guys get off real Madrid.

Poor Bobby Charlton ended up flogging his cup final
tickets to make a few quid.
By:
ImSoLuckyLucky!
When: 18 Feb 26 21:01
Rachel from accounts is
ESTASTIC!!!

Laugh
By:
DixieDean60
When: 18 Feb 26 21:10
Just after announcing the wondrous news (for Saka anyway) of his £300k+ a week deal, Arsenal then announced that season tickets for next season have increased in price by 3.9%, this despite them being one of the dearest in the EPL already.

Fans are being taken for mugs Sad
By:
sofaking
When: 18 Feb 26 21:16
Highly overrated player who rarely scores or assists. He would barely get any attention if he was a pasty ginger lad with the exact same skillset.
By:
DixieDean60
When: 18 Feb 26 21:19
The Romford Pele sofa ?
By:
Crisp77
When: 18 Feb 26 21:20
Most the fans are tourists Dixie their biggest concern is the exchange rate
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 18 Feb 26 21:21
Extending sakas contract, rather than lose him
to real Madrid like taa for nowt, makes the 3.9% more bareable
to arsenal fans no doubt.

Bukayo Saka Season-by-Season Stats (All Competitions)

    2023/24: 20 Goals, 14 Assists
    2022/23: 15 Goals, 11 Assists
    2021/22: 12 Goals, 7 Assists
    2020/21: 7 Goals, 7 Assists
    2019/20: 4 Goals, 11 Assists

Hmmm!
By:
Storm Alert
When: 18 Feb 26 21:44
Hopefully he doesn't do a Salah with his inflated salary...
By:
Crisp77
When: 18 Feb 26 21:50
Arsenal is paying £500k a week for Saka Rice.
By:
Crisp77
When: 18 Feb 26 21:51
Only a few quid at Lidl
By:
lurka
When: 18 Feb 26 22:20
Saka is worth 300k a week. He creates a lot more than his numbers suggest, despite the way Arsenal play. This season the manager has him holding width with Timber underlapping him inside instead of the other way around. Baffling. Should be playing Ben White behind him in at least half the games (if fit). Timber is woeful going forward.
By:
sadlers
When: 18 Feb 26 22:29
Nowhere near the standard of Henri and Bergkamp .Good player though .
By:
lurka
When: 18 Feb 26 22:31
Ozil and Auba were on 350k a week. Havertz is on 280k and is horizontal 90% of the time. Jesus on 250k.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 18 Feb 26 22:34
Not many better than Henri and bergkamp

Thats quite a high bar.
By:
TameTheTiger
When: 18 Feb 26 22:34
the pasty ginger-ish lad at newcastle is 95 million to buy apparently
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 18 Feb 26 22:35
£130m now
By:
DixieDean60
When: 18 Feb 26 22:56
The fact that such average players as highlighted by lurka are/were on astronomical wages merely underlines my earlier point.

The EPL serves up pretty average fare most weeks and is not worth the money that many fans fork out to watch it.
I stopped paying to watch top flight games years ago out of principle once prices rocketed along with player wages.
By:
lurka
When: 18 Feb 26 23:05
Arsenal weren't in the CL when those 2 were on 350k either. They've made €300m+ from the CL alone this year + the last 2 years. A lot more than back then from the high PL finishes too and tons more commercially.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 18 Feb 26 23:20
To be fair you had to pay more to get those players to state intent
to get where you are today.

It's a difficult one, but once a club sets those levels
for pay then it's difficult to retain staff without paying
top rates to current guys.

I saw a report tonite about championship teams and first
8 to release finances are all bleeding huge loses.

Wages over 100% of turnover in some

It's all relative, and saka will get top wages as hes
pretty much elite.

Premier league is great to watch, mines gone up to 1080 x 2
plus about 500x 2 for cup games so far.. Hardly game for the people
but some folk paying £700 for Newcastle v sunderland
in seats that had been sold to Scottish school kids earlier
in the season.
By:
1st time poster
When: 19 Feb 26 12:32
]lets be fair unless your an arsenal fan if someone texts you and says heard saka,s playing down the Rd tonight do you fancy it, answer nah thanks
just doesn't do it  for most of us and what he does do,doesn't do it enough times in one game
By:
11kv
When: 19 Feb 26 22:55
Good player got alot to prove yet.

300k a week obscene.
By:
kincsem
When: 20 Feb 26 18:59
About 3k a week would be very good money for Saka's skill and training.
But the Premier League is a television product that earns big money for the product.
The product is worth a lot as a advertising vehicle for gambling and sports goods into their target audience.
To keep the audience they overpay the actors to retain them.
By:
bungalow bill
When: 20 Feb 26 22:15
300,000K per week for someone who seems to limp off the pitch in every second game he plays (and don't even think about the ones he misses) doesn't seem like good value to me.
By:
SirNorbertClarke
When: 21 Feb 26 12:04
Saka is no Ronaldo or Kane or Henri.
By:
Wesdag
When: 23 Feb 26 11:22
Op claims to know about market forces then proceeds to show his ignorance about market forces.
If anything, AFC are getting Saka on the cheap.
If Saka was allowed to leave on a free, would a replacement come in at under £75m - which is what Saka is getting over 5 years?
And then wages on top?
Yes, the amounts are huge but players only get paid what their clubs deem they are worth in a free market.
Bear in mind, AFC generated over £600m in revenue last year - I'm sure their players were largely responsible for that.
By:
lurka
When: 23 Feb 26 13:52
Another game where Saka did nothing according to people who rely on stats after the fact and don't use their eyes. He doesn't get an assist for the first goal because it flicked off a Spurs player's foot before going to Eze. Therefore he did nothing in the game. His involvement in Eze's 2nd counts for nothing on the stats too.

Also created a good few of the OGs scored by Arsenal this season, doesn't get assists for those either.

Arteta allowed him to come in off the line a lot more yesterday and progressed the ball more thru the centre and inside, hence Eze and Gyok flourishing. Hopefully that will continue but it was more down to Spurs playing 3 CHs I suspect and no other team will be as woeful as Spurs were yesterday.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 23 Feb 26 14:18
He's getting back to full fitness, and confidence
but takes a battering week in week out.

How much would Liverpool give to have him replace
Mo Salah next season? But he's signed up to
Arsenal. He'd be similar price to isak, then £300,000+
a week on top.

I hope he's fit for world cup, as he's one of our
best hopes to win games.
By:
stu
When: 23 Feb 26 14:26
I don't follow the exact details, but is he near/top of the highest earnings in PL, or are there others above that (stupid) paycheck every week?
By:
DixieDean60
When: 23 Feb 26 14:29
So Saka's £15m (minimum) a year is justified because Arsenal as a club generated £600m revenue ???

Revenue of course does not equal profit.

I'm presuming you are referring to the 23/24 accounts, where despite a revenue of £616m the club made an overall LOSS of £17.7m.

The club has over 500 full time staff and needs 3,000 staff on matchdays (according to their own figures).

The current CEO of one of my old companies, Aviva, has an annual package of just over £7m. Very generous most may think but they oversee a company which had an annual revenue of over £22 BILLION in 2024.   Which rather puts Saka's "worth" in to perspective imo.
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 23 Feb 26 14:41
Haaland 525,000
Salah 400,000
Casemiro 350,000
Virgil 350,000

Saka 300,000
Bruno f 300,000

Marmoush 295,000
Isak 280,000


Obviously if transfer fee is lower, or it's a contract
renewal then higher wages can be negotiated.

Haaland transfer 60m isak 115m

Trent turned down a nice offer from lpool, when salah and
Virgil got their rises so likely would be on same had
he stayed.
By:
SirNorbertClarke
When: 23 Feb 26 14:48

but takes a battering week in week out.


Jeez, how would the poor luv have faired in the 60s & 70s against 'Chopper' Harris, Norman Hunter, Tommy Smith etc etc?

By:
stu
When: 23 Feb 26 14:49
cheers yhtl - silly money
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 23 Feb 26 14:50
Jeez, how would the poor luv have faired in the 60s & 70s against 'Chopper' Harris, Norman Hunter, Tommy Smith etc etc?


We are very nearly back there
By:
SirNorbertClarke
When: 23 Feb 26 14:52
I think we can all agree that modern footballers are overpaid nancy boys. The only solution is to not contribute a red cent to the league or broadcasters
By:
----you-have-to-laugh---
When: 23 Feb 26 14:58
Tom cruise $1,000,000
Dwayne Johnson $2,000,000
Adam Sandler $1,500,000
By:
Wesdag
When: 23 Feb 26 15:58

Feb 23, 2026 -- 2:29PM, DixieDean60 wrote:


So Saka's £15m (minimum) a year is justified because Arsenal as a club generated £600m revenue ???Revenue of course does not equal profit.I'm presuming you are referring to the 23/24 accounts, where despite a revenue of £616m the club made an overall LOSS of £17.7m.The club has over 500 full time staff and needs 3,000 staff on matchdays (according to their own figures). The current CEO of one of my old companies, Aviva, has an annual package of just over £7m. Very generous most may think but they oversee a company which had an annual revenue of over £22 BILLION in 2024.

By:
Wesdag
When: 23 Feb 26 16:00
Yes the wages are of course silly but that is the economic reality of football - as it currently stands.
What do you suggest, AFC offer Saka £200k a week & he leaves?
By:
DixieDean60
When: 23 Feb 26 16:28
Correct Nobby. I stopped doing so years ago once player wages really started to get out of hand.

Fans are being milked year after year and their loyalty being taken advantage of, whilst players get ever more richer. It's pure greed.
Buy a club shirt with Saka 7 on the back and it costs £100 Sad

wes - it's not just Arsenal, most of them are vastly overpaying players. If only the fans would vote with their feet then some normality could be resumed.
By:
SirNorbertClarke
When: 23 Feb 26 16:52
Dixie the firesticks will soon start to make a difference. They are rampant in the UK and the US imagine what the far east is like.
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com