|
By:
From Newcastle's POV, surely Darwin & Harvey & £20m would be a very good deal.
|
|
By:
£150m cash up front would be more suitable
|
|
By:
No-one's paying that though, and selling clubs know Newcastle have no strikers left so you'll be getting fleeced for his replacement.
|
|
By:
He's got 3 years on his contract, Madrid want him next summer
No idea what his release clause is, but likely exists, and will be communicated like gibbs white clause was. Why would Newcastle want a pop gun striker and a 5ft midfielder? |
|
By:
Don't pay late or they will add interest like Andy caroll deal
|
|
By:
well let's see. I don't really see any takers for him this summer unless Liverpool have some mad scheme. It feels like he's not agitating for a particular move, more that he's pissed off at broken promises etc.
|
|
By:
He's been sulking since the cup final
|
|
By:
He's missed 39 games because of injury while at Newcastle. It would be smart for him to take a big Saudi contract and make some money while he can still play.
|
|
By:
Agree with PP, he's not agitating for a particular move, if he was he would have let it be known weeks ago before other deals had been done, Liverpool will still be wishing he'd done it a fortnight ago before they'd dealt for Ekitike.
|
|
By:
I think if he had a release clause we'd have heard about it by now. All we've heard is how much Newc want or value him at.
He seems to want more money rather than to leave and Newc can agree to that in return for a high release clause. His wages are around the 120k a week mark reportedly. |
|
By:
If its confidential and negated by being made public
then it would be nonsensical to openly quote it after gibbs white got caught. Even Rooneys missus could work out who would have leaked it without resorting to wagitha mode. |
|
By:
Totally standard procedure for the owners to want to move their biggest assets to the biggest club in their portfolio, so Al Hilal.
|
|
By:
has he handed in a transfer request? is that official?
|
|
By:
has he handed in a transfer request? is that official?
|
|
By:
Newcastle need to dig in here, he's got another three years left on his contract.
|
|
By:
Once the dye has been cast then it quickly turns rotten, Newcastle can dig in alright but they can't make the player behve himself if he isn't professionally minded to do so, everyone loses.
|
|
By:
Unfortunately for Newcastle, they have an outlier of a player in that he's too big for where they are at the moment they need him when they finally get to the top table, PSR wise, right now he's just a problem because they can't operate with him how they'd like, he and Newcastle are both big fish forced into a small pond.
What Newcastle need to be able to do is get to where they want to be with a squad of players that no-one else is going to go after and are easily managed wage wise....very difficult to do. |
|
By:
What does that mean? Does it mean he'll forego a monetary reward arising from a future transfer? Why'd another team want him? I understand he plays for England, but England men's are pants.
|
|
By:
Newcastle do need to sell players as a further step to top table.
As injecting enough cash without sales isn't possible (unless you cheat like city) Obviously replacing him is vital too. Can afford to pay him 300k a week but then they all want it and can't afford that. Seemed obvious he would leave, but this is ahead of what was expected,... Is it worth fighting to keep him.. Can Eddie smooth it out? |
|
By:
If he's agitating to leave it's odds on he has been tapped up.
|
|
By:
liverpool nailed on
![]() |
|
By:
Get an auction going and sell him.buy blokes who want to play.i think you might find in a year or two he is overpriced.poor fitness record also.
|
|
By:
Isak is not worth £100m. That is just small club talk and is probably why he is publicly agitating to leave.
|
|
By:
They paid £63m for him and he's scored 20+ PL goals 2 years in a row since. He is definitely worth £100m in today's market.
I'd say one or two clubs have tapped him up and he knows he could be on much more elsewhere and wants more money. Why would he wait until the big clubs have spent most of their budgets before piping up if he wants a move? |
|
By:
Today's market? Which clubs have £100m to spend on a striker?
which clubs has Isak scored against in the last 2 seasons? 2023-24 Season: Fulham (1 goal) Nottingham Forest (2 goals, including a penalty) Tottenham Hotspur (2 goals) Aston Villa (2 goals) Manchester City (1 goal in EFL Cup) Sheffield United (1 goal) Burnley (1 goal) West Ham United (2 goals) Chelsea (2 goals, home and away) Liverpool (1 goal) Total: 21 goals in 30 Premier League matches, plus additional goals in cup competitions. 2024-25 Season: Ipswich Town (3 goals, hat-trick) Aston Villa (1 goal) Manchester United (1 goal) Tottenham Hotspur (1 goal) Liverpool (1 goal) Brentford (1 goal) Leicester City (1 goal) Wolves (1 goal) Arsenal (1 goal) Total: 23 goals in 34 Premier League matches, plus additional goals in other competitions. |
|
By:
It just doesn't add up
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
They get tapped up by their agent first usually
|
|
By:
At the end of the day the vast majority of footballers are mercenaries. Given they only have around 10 - 15 years at the top of their profession this shouldn't surprise anyone. Obviously there's the odd exception (Jared Bowen, Bruno Fernandez) but the facts stand.
|
|
By:
According to Kieran Maguire who is an expert in football finance, Liverpool could spend another £200m this window and still not breach PSR. Increased attendance, new shirt deal, bonuses from sponsors, have spent 1bn less than Chelsea in the last 4 years.
They spent very little last summer and got more in from sales than they spent. People are comparing them to City/Chelsea and completely ignoring this. They could also get money in by selling Nunez and Diaz on top of that and they've already got £50m in from sales this window. Real Madrid should sell Vini, move Mbappe out left and get Isak. |
|
By:
well said lurka
|
|
By:
Don’t think Liverpool need him now
Who else has got £120 million to spend and needs him? |
|
By:
I think his only way out is to Saudi, where Newcastle could luckily make enough money to clear their worries. Given the fees for Ekitike and Gyokeres no proper club is paying that much more surely. But a transfer of funds to Riyadh North, and a year for Isak to pick up stupid money in the middle east before being sold for a realistic fee next summer: could happen maybe.
|
|
By:
PSR was voted through by the big six to keep the rest at bay and it's working, they don't want Newcastle becoming the next Chelsea and City. Next step is once they're are 14 American owners in the Premier League, the trap door will be slammed shut and relegation will be no more. Kind Regards.
|
|
By:
Isak
League 78 games 54 goals FA cup 6 games 3 goals League cup 7 games 4 goals Europe 4 games 1 goal Total 95 games 62 goals https://x.com/NUFCJordd/status/1945577042503704674?s=19 .. |
|
By:
I'd be amazed if Isak went to Saudi.
Personally I'd like to see him at Liverpool. Nothing like a club having 'superstars' stuck on the bench to destroy a club's moral. |
|
By:
if he comes to liverpool he wont be stuck on the bench for sure
|
|
By:
Liverpool are ready to break the British transfer record again for Alexander Isak, but Al-Hilal are also preparing a huge bid for the Sweden striker, while Newcastle are lining up Benjamin Sesko as a potential replacement, plus more.
Liverpool are poised to make a British record bid for Newcastle and Sweden striker Alexander Isak, 25. (Mail+ - subscription required), external But Saudi side Al-Hilal are also currently preparing a bid, understood to be more than £130m, for Isak after he was omitted from Newcastle's squad for their pre-season tour of Singapore. (Talksport), external Chelsea and Manchester United have ruled out a move for Isak, with the latter having already spent big on Brazil forward Matheus Cunha, 26, and Cameroon international Bryan Mbeumo, 25. (Mail) |
|
By:
The Daily Mail
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |