Im sure BF did this recently, for example the mens Wimbledon final winners market and the mens outright winner markets. I know thats tennis but there were plenty of examples in football. I lost £1644 on the match odds but won £1653 less £33 commission on outright winner. Can anyone confirm that the comm used to be offset ? TIA
The only markets I've used where this might have been relevant are cricket tournaments (match odds and Tournament winner market),
I don't recall ever having any offset of commission.
The only markets I've used where this might have been relevant are cricket tournaments (match odds and Tournament winner market),I don't recall ever having any offset of commission.
@clydebank - still true of Racing AP markets - this from the market rules for the first one I looked at:
"Please note that an Antepost market is separate to a day of race market. Liabilities will not be carried between events however any winnings/losses in an ante-post market will be netted off against any winnings/losses in the relevant day of race market. You are only liable for commission on net winnings on both markets combined."
@clydebank - still true of Racing AP markets - this from the market rules for the first one I looked at:"Please note that an Antepost market is separate to a day of race market. Liabilities will not be carried between events however any winnings/loss