Football
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
14 Jul 25
17:47
Joined:
Date Joined:
03 Jun 11
Im sure BF did this recently, for example the mens Wimbledon final winners market and the mens outright winner markets.
I know thats tennis but there were plenty of examples in football. I lost £1644 on the match odds but won £1653 less £33 commission
on outright winner. Can anyone confirm that the comm used to be offset ? TIA
I know thats tennis but there were plenty of examples in football. I lost £1644 on the match odds but won £1653 less £33 commission
on outright winner. Can anyone confirm that the comm used to be offset ? TIA
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 5
|
By:
*Use to be
|
|
By:
The only markets I've used where this might have been relevant are cricket tournaments (match odds and Tournament winner market),
I don't recall ever having any offset of commission. |
|
By:
The only offset I'm aware of historically was Ante Post markets and race day markets. I think they stopped that though.
|
|
By:
TY guys.
Pretty sure I have had it applied to other markets to, but only being able to access 3 months P+L limits the take up options I have. |
|
By:
@clydebank - still true of Racing AP markets - this from the market rules for the first one I looked at:
"Please note that an Antepost market is separate to a day of race market. Liabilities will not be carried between events however any winnings/losses in an ante-post market will be netted off against any winnings/losses in the relevant day of race market. You are only liable for commission on net winnings on both markets combined." |