That would be comedy Gold! 


Aug 14, 2024 -- 3:05PM, TheGoddess wrote:
Sporting Life Fancy Notts Forest +47:There is the cliché cloud of uncertainty surrounding Nottingham Forest but they can take confidence from a solid enough end to last season which saw them secure Premier League survival - three of their final four defeats came against sides playing in Europe this time around.They’ve aimed to address their set-piece problems of last season by signing 6ft 8” goalkeeper Carlos Miguel and 6ft 5” centre-back Nikola Milenković - sometimes it really is that simple - with the overall balance of the squad solid enough. Bournemouth, Fulham and Wolves finished in the top six of the handicap table with starts of 46 and above in 23/24, making Forest +47 a bet worth considering.Best bet - Nottingham Forest (+47) to win the Premier League handicap table e.w. at 15/1 (bet365 1/4 1,2,3,4)
But Forest, Luton (
), Sheff U, Burnley and Everton didn't....

Aug 24, 2024 -- 12:11AM, tobermory wrote:
The odd thing about West Ham was that they were so short to start with.The handicapper is basically trying to get every team to 90pts, so he's predicting West Ham to get 58. Was that really a big blunder They didn't get that many in the last 3 seasons, I saw them the other day and they seemed to have the same team
65-66 points, and they likely win it - same they got in the 2020/21 season. They got 52 last season, and now they've bought EPL player of the season, an actual striker for once, improved the defence, and got a top manager. Now, you get 15/1 that all of that results in 13 more points. I think that's fairly good.
Aug 24, 2024 -- 8:19AM, brentford wrote:
EFL player of the season I suspect, Lifter...had me scratching my head for a minute...
Sorry, yes, my brain was half asleep

Aug 14, 2024 -- 3:05PM, TheGoddess wrote:
Sporting Life Fancy Notts Forest +47:There is the cliché cloud of uncertainty surrounding Nottingham Forest but they can take confidence from a solid enough end to last season which saw them secure Premier League survival - three of their final four defeats came against sides playing in Europe this time around.They’ve aimed to address their set-piece problems of last season by signing 6ft 8” goalkeeper Carlos Miguel and 6ft 5” centre-back Nikola Milenković - sometimes it really is that simple - with the overall balance of the squad solid enough. Bournemouth, Fulham and Wolves finished in the top six of the handicap table with starts of 46 and above in 23/24, making Forest +47 a bet worth considering.Best bet - Nottingham Forest (+47) to win the Premier League handicap table e.w. at 15/1 (bet365 1/4 1,2,3,4)
This is looking shrewd. I didn't take any notice and they are one of my bigger reds.
| 1 | Nottingham Forest(+47) | 56 | |
| 2 | Leicester(+51) | 54 | |
| 3 | Ipswich(+50) | 53 | |
| 4 | Southampton(+50) | 51 | |
| 5 | Fulham(+42) | 50 | |
| 6 | Brentford(+42) | 48 | |
| 7 | Bournemouth(+39) | 44 | |
| 8= | Everton(+42) | 43 | |
| 8= | Wolves(+42) | 43 | |
| 10 | Brighton(+32) | 41 | |
| 11 | West Ham (+34) | 38 | |
| 12 | Crystal Palace(+34) | 37 | |
| 13 | Aston Villa(+24) | 36 | |
| 14 | Newcastle(+19) | 29 | |
| 15 | Tottenham(+20+ | 27 | |
| 16 | Chelsea(+16) | 26 | |
| 17 | Manchester United(+18) | 25 | |
| 18 | Liverpool(+9) | 21 | |
| 19= | Manchester City(+0) | 13 | |
| 19= | Arsenal(+2) | 13 |
| 5.1 | Nottingham Forest | 28 | West Ham | |
| 7.8 | Brighton | 30 | Arsenal | |
| 10 | Fulham | 32 | Ipswich | |
| 12 | Aston Villa | 42 | Manchester United | |
| 15.5 | Brentford | 48 | Leicester | |
| 16.5 | Chelsea | 50 | Newcastle | |
| 17.5 | Liverpool | 70 | Everton | |
| 24 | Bournemouth | 80 | Crystal Palace | |
| 24 | Manchester City | 90 | Wolves | |
| 25 | Tottenham | 100 | Southampton |
Aug 21, 2024 -- 12:26PM, Lifter wrote:
Been filling my bags on Fulham.
Cheers.
| 1= | Nottingham Forest(+47) | 60 | |
| 1= | Leicester(+51) | 60 | |
| 3 | Ipswich(+50) | 54 | |
| 4 | Fulham(+42) | 53 | |
| 5 | Brentford(+42) | 52 | |
| 6 | Southampton(+50) | 51 | |
| 7= | Bournemouth(+39) | 50 | |
| 7= | Everton(+42) | 50 | |
| 9 | Brighton(+32) | 47 | |
| 10 | Wolves(+42) | 43 | |
| 11 | West Ham (+34) | 42 | |
| 12 | Aston Villa(+24) | 41 | |
| 13 | Crystal Palace(+34) | 37 | |
| 14 | Tottenham(+20+) | 33 | |
| 15 | Newcastle(+19) | 31 | |
| 16= | Chelsea(+16) | 30 | |
| 16= | Liverpool(+9) | 30 | |
| 18 | Manchester United(+18) | 29 | |
| 19= | Manchester City(+0) | 20 | |
| 20 | Arsenal(+2) | 19 |
| 5.1 | Nottingham Forest | 38 | Manchester City | |
| 7.8 | Brighton | 50 | Everton | |
| 8.4 | Fulham | 65 | West Ham | |
| 9.6 | Liverpool | 80 | Ipswich | |
| 11.5 | Bournemouth | 85 | Arsenal | |
| 14.5 | Brentford | 100 | Newcastle | |
| 16 | Aston Villa | 110 | Manchester United | |
| 19.5 | Tottenham | 160 | Wolves | |
| 27 | Leicester | 180 | Southampton | |
| 28 | Chelsea | 230 | Crystal Palace |
| 99 | Nottingham Forest | 75 | Manchester City | |
| 6 | Brighton | 62 | Everton | |
| 141 | Fulham | 45 | West Ham | |
| 154 | Liverpool | 72 | Ipswich | |
| 132 | Bournemouth | 367 | Arsenal | |
| 86 | Brentford | 459 | Newcastle | |
| 222 | Aston Villa | 79 | Manchester United | |
| 184 | Tottenham | 76 | Wolves | |
| 345 | Leicester | 43 | Southampton | |
| 129 | Chelsea | 123 | Crystal Palace |
| 1 | Nottingham Forest(+47) | 66 | |
| 2 | Leicester(+51) | 61 | |
| 3 | Fulham(+42) | 60 | |
| 4= | Brentford(+42) | 58 | |
| 4= | Ipswich(+50) | 58 | |
| 6= | Southampton(+50) | 54 | |
| 6= | Bournemouth(+39) | 54 | |
| 8 | Everton(+42) | 52 | |
| 9 | Brighton(+32) | 51 | |
| 10 | Wolves(+42) | 48 | |
| 11 | West Ham (+34) | 46 | |
| 12 | Aston Villa(+24) | 42 | |
| 13 | Crystal Palace(+34) | 41 | |
| 14= | Newcastle(+19) | 37 | |
| 14= | Liverpool(+9) | 37 | |
| 16 | Tottenham(+20+) | 36 | |
| 17 | Chelsea(+16) | 35 | |
| 18 | Manchester United(+18) | 33 | |
| 19= | Manchester City(+0) | 23 | |
| 20 | Arsenal(+2) | 21 |
| 3.15 | Nottingham Forest | 95 | Leicester | |
| 4.6 | Fulham | 130 | Ipswich | |
| 8.6 | Liverpool | 170 | West Ham | |
| 9 | Brighton | 200 | Everton | |
| 12.5 | Bournemouth | 250 | Manchester United | |
| 17.5 | Brentford | 300 | Manchester City | |
| 36 | Chelsea | 480 | Wolves | |
| 55 | Aston Villa | 490 | Arsenal | |
| 80 | Newcastle | 680 | Southampton | |
| 85 | Tottenham | 920 | Crystal Palace |
I think the handicapper has got it wrong
you talk of the handicapper as though it is a person, I thought the handicap is just how many points the team finished behind the winners of the previous season
| 1 | Nottingham Forest(+47) | 112 | |
| 2 | Brentford(+42) | 98 | |
| 3 | Fulham(+42) | 96 | |
| 4 | Bournemouth(+39) | 95 | |
| 5= | Liverpool(+9) | 93 | |
| 5= | Brighton(+32) | 93 | |
| 7= | Aston Villa(+24) | 90 | |
| 7= | Everton(+42) | 90 | |
| 9 | Crystal Palace(+34) | 87 | |
| 10= | Newcastle(+19) | 85 | |
| 10= | Chelsea(+16) | 85 | |
| 12 | Wolves(+42) | 84 | |
| 13 | West Ham (+34) | 77 | |
| 14= | Leicester(+51) | 76 | |
| 14= | Arsenal(+2) | 76 | |
| 16 | Ipswich(+50) | 72 | |
| 17 | Manchester City(+0) | 71 | |
| 18 | Southampton(+50) | 62 | |
| 19= | Manchester United(+18) | 60 | |
| 20 | Tottenham(+20+) | 58 |
Aug 11, 2024 -- 6:10PM, Lifter wrote:
Not sure about having to be poor last year. Palace are kind of in the same boat as Villa were - bad start to the season but finished strongly. Although, yeah, I don't think they are on the same trajectory. Tell you what, Forest at +47 could give you a run.
Wish I listened to myself
made a small ammount, but main bets were Fulham (not bad) and West Ham (awful).
Interested to see the handicap for next season. This season, it was clear the value was with those middle table clubs, as it would be hard for promoted teams and those looking to win the league. Maybe it reverses next season. Transfer window could decide it