Hello , a friend of my son as managed to deposit £1500 with a top bookmaker ,and increase it to £10,000 betting on corners market, including games in the euros,when trying to withdraw the money ,was accused of match fixing and had is original deposit of £1500 returned but wont return his winnings ,is this allowed.
Did the bookie actually accuse him of match fixing? As if a punter could fix the number of corners in a Euro match... Even if he could, the sums you're talking of would not make it happen
More info required
Hello, this seems very strangeDid the bookie actually accuse him of match fixing?As if a punter could fix the number of corners in a Euro match... Even if he could, the sums you're talking of would not make it happenMore info required
'including games in the euros' If all the bets were on the Euro games then i'm sure the bookie doesn't have a chance. If the majority of the gains were made on obscure matches and only a small amount of 'cover play' on the Euros, then it's something different? good luck with it anyway
'including games in the euros' If all the bets were on the Euro games then i'm sure the bookie doesn't have a chance. If the majority of the gains were made on obscure matches and only a small amount of 'cover play' on the Euros, then it's something
I've said this before but a friend of mine took L@dbrokes to the small claims court (he'd backed Hamilton in several shops to win SPOTY at 16/1 and they wanted to give him 6/1 or something similar) and they never showed up. There are things he can do. Post details on TrustPilot, email Sportsbook Review, write to odds comparison sites and the newspapers, use IBAS or Resolver. My friend went straight to the small claims court.
I've said this before but a friend of mine took L@dbrokes to the small claims court (he'd backed Hamilton in several shops to win SPOTY at 16/1 and they wanted to give him 6/1 or something similar) and they never showed up. There are things he can d
actually he went to IBAS first, then the Small Claims Court. IBAS were useless despite the evidence being totally in my friends favour. He is fastidious in documenting evidence. I try to remember to do the same. Nearly always photograph and screenshot evidence where I think there is the potential for a bookie to welch.
actually he went to IBAS first, then the Small Claims Court. IBAS were useless despite the evidence being totally in my friends favour. He is fastidious in documenting evidence. I try to remember to do the same. Nearly always photograph and screen
Review sites and comparison sites are full of negative feedback as are most social media sites, and it doesn't seem to bother bookies.
Well done your mate taking it beyond ibas.
I do think ibas is a good first step, as sometimes a court will have expected you to have gone through attempted negotiated settlement first.
Review sites and comparison sites are full of negative feedbackas are most social media sites, and it doesn't seemto bother bookies.Well done your mate taking it beyond ibas.I do think ibas is a good first step, as sometimes a courtwill have expected
Way back in 2002, a company called Betworld were avoiding paying me and BetBrain intervened and I got paid out. They went bust a few months later. Trustpilot have also come to my aid as the bookie responded when they were ignoring emails.
Way back in 2002, a company called Betworld were avoiding paying me and BetBrain intervened and I got paid out. They went bust a few months later. Trustpilot have also come to my aid as the bookie responded when they were ignoring emails.
Would like to know the matches 'your friend' bet on in corners
A 'top bookie' wouldn't do make that accusation willy nilly, a fly by night bookie would, so I imagine they were bets on corners, in matches always with the same ref, in a low level league, and he probably never bet on anything else.
Would like to know the matches 'your friend' bet on in cornersA 'top bookie' wouldn't do make that accusation willy nilly, a fly by night bookie would, so I imagine they were bets on corners, in matches always with the same ref, in a low level league
Could be mes but I doubt it. What I suspect is much more likely that the bookie thinks the young lad is betting on someone else's behalf. They've got no proof and have made up the match fixing allegation in the hope that if they are right the matter won't be pursued.
Could be mes but I doubt it. What I suspect is much more likely that the bookie thinks the young lad is betting on someone else's behalf. They've got no proof and have made up the match fixing allegation in the hope that if they are right the matte
Only just realised the OP threw in a game in the Euro's, maybe he bet on a high level game to throw the bookies off the scent.
Corner betting is difficult, there's no real rhyme or reason to it and results have always seemed more random than other markets like goals or cards where stats are more prevelant and useful, to increase your ROI by that much on a market like that seems suspicious in itself, I would guess he was betting on the fewest amount of corners he could, i.e unders, and the dodgy officials kept given a goal kick instead.
Only just realised the OP threw in a game in the Euro's, maybe he bet on a high level game to throw the bookies off the scent.Corner betting is difficult, there's no real rhyme or reason to it and results have always seemed more random than other mar
You really need to name the bookie. If it's a bookie that you can take to a UK small claims court, that is the way to go, after pursuing other avenues first.
You really need to name the bookie. If it's a bookie that you can take to a UK small claims court, that is the way to go, after pursuing other avenues first.
My guess is it probably is allowed. I am surprised you even got back the 1,500. They can keep your deposit, keep your winnings, freeze your account claiming suspicious activity. The only thing that will work in your favour is giving them sustained maximum adverse publicity on this forum, and on every other forum. You should give full details, bookmaker name, amounts, dates, not protect them by witholding their name. Damage their reputation and they do less business and earn less profits.
My guess is it probably is allowed.I am surprised you even got back the 1,500.They can keep your deposit, keep your winnings, freeze your account claiming suspicious activity.The only thing that will work in your favour is giving them sustained maxim
I'd guess that the bookie has been lax in updating minor markets in running and he's been betting stale prices. He should ask the company to provide all the info it holds on him under data protection law, then consider legal action after that. If the prices were wildly out of line, they might validly be palpable errors.
I'd guess that the bookie has been lax in updating minor markets in running and he's been betting stale prices. He should ask the company to provide all the info it holds on him under data protection law, then consider legal action after that. If the
The whole palpable error rule needs an airing in court. st4n j4mes used to post ool prices on top ten golf markets week after week, if you took one and lost, thank you for playing, if it won, palpable error invoked.
The whole palpable error rule needs an airing in court. st4n j4mes used to post ool prices on top ten golf markets week after week, if you took one and lost, thank you for playing, if it won, palpable error invoked.
they probably suspect spot fixing rather than match fixing but would have to be very low league stuff for that sum of money to impact a player. it's more likely something along the lines of the next corner, someone with fast pics or at the game, if these were in play bets. if they were placed pre kick off, then it's much less likely you could cheat but if it's obscure leagues where you maybe have some sort of edge, they still won't like it.
they probably suspect spot fixing rather than match fixing but would have to be very low league stuff for that sum of money to impact a player. it's more likely something along the lines of the next corner, someone with fast pics or at the game, if t
DIE LINKE • July 10, 2024 11:08 AM BST You are not entering into a contract when you place a bet, so if they offer 5/1 instead of 5/2 they can legally cancel the bet.
You have a contract if the bet is accepted, but the contract is subject to their terms, which allow them to void a palpable error. The point at issue, is a palp should be a rare occurance not a common and easy way to manage poor odds setting.
DIE LINKE • July 10, 2024 11:08 AM BSTYou are not entering into a contract when you place a bet, so if they offer 5/1 instead of 5/2 they can legally cancel the bet. You have a contract if the bet is accepted, but the contract is subject to their t
very strange, not sure I know of any bookmaker that would take any type of large bet on anything let alone a corners market, I would have thought they would restrict you within 1 bet. ,especially if you win.
very strange, not sure I know of any bookmaker that would take any type of large bet on anything let alone a corners market, I would have thought they would restrict you within 1 bet.,especially if you win.
Aspro they will track you on internet, see you use betfair and or oddschecker and likely don't want you.
Get a relative to open an account, place a few bet builders, and you should be able to place a few bets via them.
Aspro they will track you on internet, see you use betfair andor oddschecker and likely don't want you.Get a relative to open an account, place a fewbet builders, and you should be able to placea few bets via them.
Aspro they probably read your forum posts and knew that you were just too shrewd. That or your £5 was on the number of corners in some Romanian division 3 game and their price was too high.
Aspro they probably read your forum posts and knew that you were just too shrewd. That or your £5 was on the number of corners in some Romanian division 3 game and their price was too high.
Too shrewd I wished, although it was an obscure game I bet on so that could have been a factor. I would also imagine that they have stored my ISP address, which could make a relative too difficult... no?
Too shrewd I wished, although it was an obscure game I bet on so that could have been a factor. I would also imagine that they have stored my ISP address, which could make a relative too difficult... no?