Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 85 comments are related to the topic:
Premier league footballers.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 85
By:
drive for show putt for dough
When: 05 Apr 20 15:16
Coachbuster 05 Apr 20 13:53 
darren, the rich and the famous don't contribute more because they pay more tax .... that's nonsense Grin ..the tax is just a by product from their riches which have been funded by the mega rich who have  taken directly/indirectly from the poor (generally by scheming )   

the ones that contribute the most to this country pay modest tax amounts  ...ie the hardest workers


I would disagree with this. Nearly half of the tv rights comes from overseas £4.2billion this element has been rising while the domestic rights have fallen. This is a product of the premier league being regarded as the 'best league in the world'. The main reason for this is the standard and the fact so many top players from around the world play in England. This does contribute directly to the tax take.

30 years ago Italy was without doubt the worlds number 1 national league. It attracted the best players from around the globe. The Italian league has lost its way and would fourth at best now in its standing. Its global tv rights for the current deal are £371 million less than a tenth of the premier leagues.

If the best players left most people in the UK would continue to watch the game the next tier of players etc but the income global would drop significantly. This would impact the deals clubs could offer players going forward and in turn this would impact the UK tax returns from football.
By:
wolf3011
When: 05 Apr 20 15:20

Apr 5, 2020 -- 2:29PM, drive for show putt for dough wrote:


wolf3011 04 Apr 20 23:47  In terms of the " top foreign talent here", maybe that explains why the national team has been generally second rate for the last 25 years and always will be when clubs have starting elevens with hardly any native players...not that the international scene is of any concern to me but even your argument on the talent front has considerable downsidesWe were so good in the 1970s when there were no foreigners


The 1970 England team was expected to win the world cup so yes compared to today you're spot on as the current team couldnt win an egg and spoon race

By:
Coachbuster
When: 05 Apr 20 15:31
I would disagree with this. Nearly half of the tv rights comes from overseas £4.2billion
_____________________

I take your point on the global aspect ...  it is a big business ,how much this country benefits though is debatable  ....  some tax comes in , but a lot is invested outwards  ... 

at the end of the day the public must decide for themselves i guess how they want to spend their money .

The lottery isn't much better ...millionaires becoming more common leading to more destitution
By:
drive for show putt for dough
When: 05 Apr 20 16:08
The overseas rights have led to the huge surge in wages in recent years, it is why all premier league clubs have huge wage bills in comparison to other european leagues. This money filters back in tax.

I agree its obscene the amounts some players earn but it would impact the revenues the government get from football.
By:
Coachbuster
When: 05 Apr 20 17:04
i suppose one bright area is  at least players spend their millions Cool
By:
ZEALOT
When: 05 Apr 20 17:24
Football is shyte .
Page 3 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com