Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 124 comments are related to the topic:
Real Madrid v Man City wed 1st leg

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 4 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 124
By:
REDUNDANT PUNTER
When: 27 Feb 20 11:30
Was always going to be the home leg for city that would be the problem Imo
By:
Rider
When: 27 Feb 20 11:33
its a pity liverpool didnt draw them madrid as it would have been one of the bets of the season last night, klopp wouldnt have fckd about with the team and tactics he'd just said do your usual stuff and exposed them
By:
ffaith
When: 27 Feb 20 13:06
Really impressed with the ref.   He is no homer that is for sure.    I can name lots of EPL refs that would have bottled the big 3 decisions.  We need refs of that calibre in the prem.
By:
lurka
When: 27 Feb 20 13:46
Thought Ramos was minimal contact, certainly not enough to make Jesus fall over but it impeded him and was a foul. Jesus played it well and was a red for the deliberate nature of it. Ramos can have no complaints (and didn't).

Sterling's was a clear dive. He was on his way down well before contact was made. Pushed his right foot into the ground and fell onto the defender's legs. He saw the tackle coming but didn't need to do that. It would have been a foul if he'd stayed up. Would prefer to see no pen and a booking for that. They will never stamp out diving if they let things like that go on VAR reviews. Same with that pen Napoli got against Liverpool, forward dives into the defender and easy enough to see on the video. https://twitter.com/IStewdog/status/1232802167058243586?s=20
By:
lurka
When: 27 Feb 20 13:51
Also a lot of people saying if Ramos was a foul then Jesus' was too for the first goal. Both minimal contact but not as simple as that imo as they were different incidents but a good point all the same. Ramos' was definitely a foul, Jesus not as clear but could easily have gone the other way and I expected the VAR guys to rule it out with Real at home. No issue with it either way for me really.
Page 4 of 4  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com