What's happening here? Like with the Gooners/psg game. I really hope this isn't the way that it's going. It's killing me. Can't make head nor tail of it.
It's abysmal, just another obstacle in the way of trying to make any money on here. It's pretty much useless as an indicator of what's happening in a match.
It's abysmal, just another obstacle in the way of trying to make any money on here. It's pretty much useless as an indicator of what's happening in a match.
These things are a great invention. Just the thing to attract Billy Bunters to games they have no opinion on, instead they place their bets based on stats provided by some desperado getting a couple of quid to attend some godforsaken fixture. Dangerous attack my @rse!
These things are a great invention. Just the thing to attract Billy Bunters to games they have no opinion on, instead they place their bets based on stats provided by some desperado getting a couple of quid to attend some godforsaken fixture. Dangero
DI LI I take your point. What is " billy bunters " please? I'm no authority on anything, certainly no world football, just another guesser, I suppose, trying not to lose.
DI LI I take your point. What is " billy bunters " please?I'm no authority on anything, certainly no world football, just another guesser, I suppose, trying not to lose.
Maybe I was a little harsh, over zealous perhaps, in my critcism of the new, if it IS to be the new, way forward, match-view and match-stats features. This new " match-stats " thing appears to show,, very precisely actually, what constitutes a "dangerous attack ". Worth a look imo.
Maybe I was a little harsh, over zealous perhaps, in my critcism of the new, if it IS to be the new, way forward, match-view and match-stats features.This new " match-stats " thing appears to show,, very precisely actually, what constitutes a "dange
I think that it needs to lose the percentages and just give amounts in plain numbers. That is only my opinion of course.
Anybody else have a view on this?
No Billy Bunters please.
I think that it needs to lose the percentages and just give amounts in plain numbers.That is only my opinion of course.Anybody else have a view on this?No Billy Bunters please.
Punters, ericster! SV Schalding-Heining v Burghausen on the box this morning. Dangerous attacks interpreted very widely for such a p1sspoor level. People more likely to bet on games with 20 dangerous attacks in the first half, than those with 1 shot on goal.
Punters, ericster! SV Schalding-Heining v Burghausen on the box this morning. Dangerous attacks interpreted very widely for such a p1sspoor level. People more likely to bet on games with 20 dangerous attacks in the first half, than those with 1 shot
it's that wide interpretation that's he killer imo. Shots on goal ARE a factor of course. But both of these are not the be all and end all. The inplay mkt must have a say here.
Yeah,it's that wide interpretation that's he killer imo.Shots on goal ARE a factor of course.But both of these are not the be all and end all.The inplay mkt must have a say here.