Football
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
What's happening here?
Like with the Gooners/psg game.
I really hope this isn't the way that it's going.
It's killing me.
Can't make head nor tail of it.
Like with the Gooners/psg game.
I really hope this isn't the way that it's going.
It's killing me.
Can't make head nor tail of it.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 12
|
By:
Call me an old stick in the mud.
Maybe I just don't like change. |
|
By:
It's abysmal, just another obstacle in the way of trying to make any money on here. It's pretty much useless as an indicator of what's happening in a match.
|
|
By:
Looks like Subutteo from a distance
 |
|
By:
These things are a great invention. Just the thing to attract Billy Bunters to games they have no opinion on, instead they place their bets based on stats provided by some desperado getting a couple of quid to attend some godforsaken fixture. Dangerous attack my @rse!
|
|
By:
DI LI I take your point. What is " billy bunters " please?
I'm no authority on anything, certainly no world football, just another guesser, I suppose, trying not to lose. |
|
By:
Maybe I was a little harsh, over zealous perhaps, in my critcism of the new, if it IS to be the new, way forward, match-view and match-stats features.
This new " match-stats " thing appears to show,, very precisely actually, what constitutes a "dangerous attack ". Worth a look imo. |
|
By:
Sorry,
I meant the "match VIEW ". Sill trying to work out the point of the new " match-stats ". |
|
By:
I think that it needs to lose the percentages and just give amounts in plain numbers.
That is only my opinion of course. Anybody else have a view on this? No Billy Bunters please. |
|
By:
Maybe the key stat here is " goal-attempts ". That, as sure as h*ll is one dangerous attack.
Is anyone else looking at this? |
|
By:
Punters, ericster! SV Schalding-Heining v Burghausen on the box this morning. Dangerous attacks interpreted very widely for such a p1sspoor level. People more likely to bet on games with 20 dangerous attacks in the first half, than those with 1 shot on goal.
|
|
By:
Yeah,
it's that wide interpretation that's he killer imo. Shots on goal ARE a factor of course. But both of these are not the be all and end all. The inplay mkt must have a say here. |
|
By:
Oh ffs, the killer.
|