



Oct 8, 2017 -- 6:30PM, Outpost wrote:
goalie almost moved that time
hey sucker................haven't u been moaning and whining on for years, that if u only were luckily enough to have had the same easy qualifying group as England, u would have qualified for a tournament finals this millennium?
Oct 8, 2017 -- 6:59PM, Outpost wrote:
They should have beaten england twice and finished up with only one point from those two games - that cost them a place in the finals
Bleat, bleat, bleat, whine, whine, whine................ u have been moaning and whining on for years, that if u only were luckily enough to have had the same easy qualifying group as England, u would have easily qualified at least once for a tournament finals this millennium.
Well sucker, what is yr excuse this time?
How many teams are needed in the finals before the sweaty socks qualify again? 48? 64? 80? 96? 112? 128? More?


Oct 8, 2017 -- 7:33PM, gut feeling wrote:
Bye the looks of it you English aren't going far that's the poorest England side I've seen for a long time.
That finished 8 (EIGHT) points above the sweaty socks.
Oct 8, 2017 -- 7:37PM, The Bhoys wrote:
England always get an easy group and scotland get tough
Bleat, bleat, bleat, whine, whine, whine................ u have been moaning and whining on for years, that if u only were luckily enough to have had the same easy qualifying group as England, u would have easily qualified at least once for a tournament finals this millennium.
Well, what is yr excuse this time?
How many teams are needed in the finals before the sweaty socks qualify again? 48? 64? 80? 96? 112? 128? More?
Oct 10, 2017 -- 7:09PM, Outpost wrote:
that was scotland's best ever chance to qualify as we usually have 2 big teams in our group and this year we had no big teams in the section. we should have been able to qualify from a group like that but once again we don't have an international class striker who we can depend on to score goals.
Bleat, bleat, bleat, whine, whine, whine................ u have been moaning and whining on for years, that if u only were luckily enough to have had the same easy qualifying group as England, u would have easily qualified at least once for a tournament finals this millennium.
Well, what is yr excuse this time sucker?
How many teams are needed in the finals before the sweaty socks qualify again? 48? 64? 80? 96? 112? 128? More?
Oct 10, 2017 -- 7:09PM, Outpost wrote:
that was scotland's best ever chance to qualify as we usually have 2 big teams in our group and this year we had no big teams in the section. we should have been able to qualify from a group like that but once again we don't have an international class striker who we can depend on to score goals.
Well then sucker, how many teams are needed in the finals before the sweaty socks qualify again? 48? 64? 80? 96? 112? 128? More?
Oct 13, 2017 -- 9:14PM, Outpost wrote:
That's why we got rid of the manager. We had an easy group and didn't qualify.
Well sucker, the question remains, how many teams are needed in the finals before u sweaty socks qualify again? 48? 64? 80? 96? 112? 128? More?