Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Somerset Sam
31 Jul 16 09:06
Joined:
Date Joined: 11 Mar 02
| Topic/replies: 1,756 | Blogger: Somerset Sam's blog
Just had a quick look through the current squads for Man City, Man Utd, Chelsea and Arsenal and while it was initially exciting as to the Pogba rumours, none of these teams have properly added or strengthened at the centre back position.

Each of them still have glaring weaknesses in defence (through current personnel or persistent injury doubts eg Kompany) and imo they'd be better suited to throwing money at a Bonucci, Varane, Mustafi or Marquinhos.

Teams that concede the fewest goals generally win their league.

Thoughts?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 63
By:
OnePercenter
When: 31 Jul 16 09:38
I agree, if you want to win the league you must have a dominant back 4. Jose has already bought Bailly and the press are reporting he wants another centreback.

Pep reportedly wants his back 4 to knock it about at the back. That should be interesting, wonder how many clean sheets they will keep.
By:
thelatarps
When: 31 Jul 16 19:39
A fair point
But more important is to have a philosophy that works.
If you are keeping possession of the ball for 70% of the football game, then the chances of you conceding is less than if you get 40% ball.
That appears to be Gaurdiolas philosophy, tho I must say i share the OPs scepticism on that in the epl
Jose's philosophy of defensive solidity has its downside too.
HIs record against the traditional recognised power house teams in the epl is outstanding.
But against teams who offer a defensive stance his teams can struggle to score goals, they drop points. Often with uninspiring draws.
Now in this era of the epl it is getting harder to distinguish the power houses from the also rans...
By:
n88uk
When: 31 Jul 16 20:32
Varane is never going to leave Real Madrid for any EPL team, why would he? Marquinhos won't go unless PSG are happy to sell. Bonucci is probably impossible to get now Juventus are selling Pogba, Juventus are hardly likely to sell Pogba and Bonucci in the same window.
By:
thelatarps
When: 31 Jul 16 20:47
pity
without bonucci i think juve would be even more bang average than they are at the moment.
By:
tobermory
When: 31 Jul 16 20:53
How are they 'average' Confused

One of the Top 5 teams in Europe.
By:
cricketnut2
When: 31 Jul 16 21:04
Lots of shocks, again this season,

Man City will probably win the League
Chelsea may struggle again and at best may just scrape into the top 4
Man Utd read Chelsea
Arsenal can see them finishing 5th or 6th
Leicester I reckon they'll finish around 10th this season
Liverpool and West Ham may well finish in the top 4
Tottenham another likely 2nd for them

Now you might say not too many shocks there, but I wouldn't be surprised if Chelsea, Man Utd and Arsenal all finish below 4th.
By:
vagabond
When: 31 Jul 16 21:42
I disagree about Spurs and I am a Spurs supporter. We missed our chance last year and with the Champions League to focus on this year, my feeling is we shall be lucky to make Top 4. We couldn't even manage second last season - still we finish below Arsenal. Incredible after the season we had.
By:
vagabond
When: 31 Jul 16 21:44
Unless Arsenal splash the cash they are never going to win the league either I am pleased to say. As long as Wenger remains in charge they will remain a Top 4 team who make the last 16 of the Champions League and then get knocked out.
By:
cricketnut2
When: 31 Jul 16 22:12
Agree with you on Wenger, they'll get rid of him, I think, as I think they'll struggle this season.
By:
n88uk
When: 01 Aug 16 14:01
West Ham seem incredibly overrated on the strength of adding very little to their squad so far. Top 7 maybe, top 4 pretty much no chance.

Arsenal probably will "struggle" but still end up finishing top 4. They struggled last year and finished 2nd.

I'm in the camp that Tottenham blew their chance too. It's just hard to see the Premier League being as bad as it was last year. Chelsea imploded early. Man City imploded mid-season, Man Utd imploded all season. It's hard to see all of them not being far stronger next year, just on change of managers alone. That makes things much tougher for Spurs who are unlikely to be much better than last year. I can see Spurs maybe top 4, can't see them challenging for the title though.

Liverpool's signings have been awful imo. I thought Klopp would do a good job, and was kind of worried about Liverpool, but the players they brought in don't impress me at all. They seem to have strengthened in about the only position they didn't need to strengthen and not strengthened in any of the key areas they needed to.
By:
Can't Catch Me
When: 01 Aug 16 14:17
and not strengthened in any of the key areas they needed to.

Apart from goalkeeper. And CB. Which were two of the biggest priorities.
By:
mafeking
When: 01 Aug 16 14:17
if spurs blew their chance it was before we knew we had a chance. drew 8 of the first 16. from then on until the last 4 games when it was over anyway we were miles clear of the rest including leicester

they didn't make any mistakes. lost 1 game after beating us at WHL in mid january. no one leaving WHL that night thought we'd blown our chance of the title - arsenal were well clear and hot favourites at that stage. didn't even think we were in it. at the time it seemed any old game between 2 sides battling for a top 4 spot. would had to have won at least 15 of the last 17. impossible
By:
Can't Catch Me
When: 01 Aug 16 14:17
How can anyone dismiss signings as 'awful' before a ball has even been kicked? Your crystal ball must be better than mine.
By:
n88uk
When: 01 Aug 16 15:00

Aug 1, 2016 -- 2:17PM, Can't Catch Me wrote:


and not strengthened in any of the key areas they needed to.Apart from goalkeeper. And CB. Which were two of the biggest priorities.


They bought 2 very average players in these positions, hard to call that strengthening. Is like saying Arsenal have strengthened at CB signing Rob Holding, how many Arsenal fans do you think still think they need a CB?

And on your next post, isn't the point of a thread like this to judge. Anyone can say after time, oh the signings were sh*t. You can predict now. And for me Mane and Wijnaldum although ok players in themselves aren't really players Liverpool needed, how do Liverpool even plan fitting all these players in? That sort of area of the pitch was one of the few areas Liverpool were arguably already strong.

The whole point is to make a judgement now. After Liverpool sold Suarez, there was arguments on here, with Liverpool fans saying they'd strengthened the overall squad, and others saying they'd just bought a load of average players. The whole point of a thread like this though is to take a judgement now, not when you have the results in front of you at the end of the season.

By:
n88uk
When: 01 Aug 16 15:04
By blew their chance Mafeking, I didn't mean you got in position to win it and lost. I meant will the league ever be that weak again for Spurs to be in with a shout. For me Spurs were no better last year than when they were often battling for 4th and finished 4th or 5th, just the rest of the top teams were so crap that it happened you were a lot higher and seen as in the mix because the top team was Leicester who were expected to blow it at some point.

Which is why I expect Spurs to go back to that this season, not really in with a sniff of the title but challenging for 4th, and finishing 4th or 5th.
By:
mafeking
When: 01 Aug 16 15:28
i expect we will get other chances in say the next 20 years. when we move into the new ground the financial gap to the rest of the big 6 will be closed significantly but as arsenal have shown spectacularly that doesn't necessarily translate into lots of trophies
By:
tobermory
When: 01 Aug 16 18:01
I thought Spurs were significantly better last season than when they were finishing 5th/6th.

The points total may not have been much different but they were dominating most games. The year before they had a freakish number of late wins after getting outplayed.
By:
tobermory
When: 01 Aug 16 18:07
I agree with n88 about Mane and Winjaldum.

Mane just seems the sort of player you'd expect to see in a side finishing about 6th. Won't weaken Liverpool but for £35M you should be getting someone proven Top 4 level.

I have no idea what Klopp saw in Winaldum last season to be paying £25M . Newcastle bought him for half that and I'd have thought they'd be glad to make their money back.

The younger players bought cheaply could be anything though you couldn't have high expectations.
By:
mafeking
When: 01 Aug 16 18:28
yep tobermory we were top of virtually every important statistic except points unfortunately. you'd have to say 71 was a freakishly low total for such domination of most games

go back to 2013 when we finished 5th on 72 bale carried a moderate team almost singlehandedly there was no comparison in level of performance compared to last season

we paid the penalty for 4 or 5 home games which we led, couldn't put the opposition away and ended up losing or drawing
By:
Can't Catch Me
When: 01 Aug 16 18:45
N88uk. Of course the point is to have an opinion now, and everyone is entitled to one, but how much do you know about the other signings? I would suggest very little, based on your posts. Yet you're telling me they aren't very good.

Joel Matip was voted in the Bundesliga team of the season last year. So in the top two CB's in the whole league. Yet you're telling me you know he's not very good? Karius was voted third best keeper in the Bundesliga, yet youre also telling me he isn't any good, and more importantly, neither of these players are an improvement on Mignolet or Martin Skrtel?

If Matip isn't better than Skrtel, I'll give up the game. And I'm virtually certain Karius will be better than Mignolet.

One of Liverpools biggest issues last season was height. We were a small team, and that's been addresses with some of the purchases. Similarly pace. Klopp's methods require pace and speed in the transition which we didn't have last year. The likes of Mane and Wijnaldum will help significantly with that imo.

I will also be very surprised if Mane doesn't represent a significant upgrade on Lallana, who is one of the least effective footballers in the league, for all that he's pretty on the eye.
By:
Can't Catch Me
When: 01 Aug 16 18:47
And as for comparing Arsenal signing an unproven young lad from Bolton, to Liverpool signing an established player form the Bundelsiga, that's quite frankly ridiculous.
By:
n88uk
When: 01 Aug 16 18:53

Aug 1, 2016 -- 6:01PM, tobermory wrote:


I thought Spurs were significantly better last season than when they were finishing 5th/6th.The points total may not have been much different but they were dominating most games. The year before they had a freakish number of late wins after getting outplayed.


How much are the big games influencing this though? The took far more points off the big teams than they were ordinarily would. It just seems a total anomaly for the big teams to be as bad as they were last year.

It says it all that general consensus would be that Arsenal were poor last year, yet they actually finished 2nd, their best finish in 11 years. But their fans know that it was a golden opportunity to win the league and pretty much no-one was giving Arsenal any praise for finishing 2nd in what was clearly the weakest Premier League in some time.

By:
OnePercenter
When: 01 Aug 16 18:58
West Ham & Spurs are both benefitting from have tough no-nonsense astute managers. Those two make average players play very well.
By:
ffaith
When: 01 Aug 16 19:34
West Ham.  In the league last year we scored the same number of goals as Arsenal. Only leicester, Spurs and Man City scored more goals.
We conceded more goals than Watford and West Brom.  We conceded 51 goals the same as Palace.

2016/7.  Our LB is out for up to 4 months.  We don't seem to have adequate cover for him.  Our manager continues to use Antonio as a RB.  Playing Antonio as a rb in a back 5 is debatable.  Playing him as a rb in a back 4 is just cruel IMO.
In attack we have not yet signed the marquee striker we have been chasing all off season.  We have also just agreed a fee to sell our best striker.  Most hammers think Carroll is our best striker but I think it is Sakho.
So as it stands i think we are weaker both in defence and attack.
By:
jed.davison
When: 01 Aug 16 19:38
By blew their chance Mafeking, I didn't mean you got in position to win it and lost. I meant will the league ever be that weak again for Spurs to be in with a shout. For me Spurs were no better last year than when they were often battling for 4th and finished 4th or 5th, just the rest of the top teams were so crap that it happened you were a lot higher and seen as in the mix because the top team was Leicester who were expected to blow it at some point.

Which is why I expect Spurs to go back to that this season, not really in with a sniff of the title but challenging for 4th, and finishing 4th or 5th.


You couldn't be more wrong. You are wrong about last season. Spurs were not better - or worse - than they had been when finishing fourth or fifth under Rednapp or AVB; as if their progress had been part of an evolution of which Pochettino was merely the latest curator. Spurs were completely different. It is not the same club any more. It's not the club it's been since Gascoigne left, and it's not the club it ever was before he arrived.

It had to happen really. Spurs are a massive club, and sooner or later Levy would find the right man for the job. It is as simple as that. Pochettino has made Spurs something they have never been, in one season. He is just getting started, and he has a young squad that believes in him totally and contains some of the best players in the Leage in all positions.

Spurs will not revert to being also-rans while Pochettino is in charge. They will be better again this season.
By:
hitmanhearn
When: 01 Aug 16 19:50
Mane looks like a player you would expect to see in a top 6 side is possibly the most ridiculous thing I've heard on this forum.If a manager thinks he can improve a player he must be backed to do so.
By:
jed.davison
When: 01 Aug 16 19:55
I've seen a lot of people dissing Mane, they are gonna look proper mugs.
By:
rothko
When: 01 Aug 16 19:59
Liverpool and chelsea have a massive advantage with no european football - all the stats say so
Dont fancy spurs at all in the PL this year given their first year in the CL. Cant see them having the resources to strengthen the squad given the move to the new stadium - will defo finish outside the top 4 for me
agree with the original poster about defensive weaknesses of the supposed top PL sides
will be an interesting season with Pep and Jose in manchester given their history and whether jose will revert to the classless piece of scum he truely is or will be able to keep a lid on it
By:
jed.davison
When: 01 Aug 16 20:07
I don't see how you can say that you think Spurs will finsih outside the top four and then agree with the opening poster about defences being key. Spurs clearly the best defence in the League, all season long.
By:
jed.davison
When: 01 Aug 16 20:09
And we do not need to add to our squad. We only need to improve a few points, and given the age of our squad and the fact that Pochettino is clearly a judge, it's unlikely we won't improve more than a few points.
By:
rothko
When: 01 Aug 16 20:11
will struggle with the CL commitments Jed unless they strengthen the squad significantly
dont underestimate the impact it has playing at that level in midweek and then again at the weekend especially if they get a couple of key injuries
By:
loui
When: 01 Aug 16 20:28
Don't think you can take it away from Spurs scoring late, it's a sign of strength when a team finishes games strongly so I think that's a big plus point for them. Champs leg will have an effect though for cert.
By:
Can't Catch Me
When: 01 Aug 16 20:46
Spurs had the Europa League last season though. If anything, the CL is easier, in terms of travel and amount of games, so I personally can't have that as a negative for this season compared to last.

I woildnt have Spurs going backwards, but I do think they have been very reliant on Kane, and based on his performances in the Euros, it wouldn't surprise me if he had a less successful season this year.
By:
Can't Catch Me
When: 01 Aug 16 20:48
N88. Still waiting for you to back up your assertion that Matip and Karius are 'very average' please and your knowledge of said players?
By:
rothko
When: 01 Aug 16 20:48
Think the difference with the CL is that you cant get away with making changes and resting players for the weekend particularly in the group stages
I rate Spurs but first year in the CL can sometimes be an eye opener
By:
Can't Catch Me
When: 01 Aug 16 20:50
Tough group and they could be out at the group stages anyway. That's only six games extra!
By:
rothko
When: 01 Aug 16 20:52
Yes but can have a serious impact on confidence to go out at the group stage
worse you finish third and end up in the Europa
Just think they need to add a couple of quality players but probably havent got the financial muscle at the moment
By:
n88uk
When: 01 Aug 16 20:57

Aug 1, 2016 -- 6:45PM, Can't Catch Me wrote:


N88uk. Of course the point is to have an opinion now, and everyone is entitled to one, but how much do you know about the other signings? I would suggest very little, based on your posts. Yet you're telling me they aren't very good. Joel Matip was voted in the Bundesliga team of the season last year. So in the top two CB's in the whole league. Yet you're telling me you know he's not very good? Karius was voted third best keeper in the Bundesliga, yet youre also telling me he isn't any good, and more importantly, neither of these players are an improvement on Mignolet or Martin Skrtel?If Matip isn't better than Skrtel, I'll give up the game. And I'm virtually certain Karius will be better than Mignolet. One of Liverpools biggest issues last season was height. We were a small team, and that's been addresses with some of the purchases. Similarly pace. Klopp's methods require pace and speed in the transition which we didn't have last year. The likes of Mane and Wijnaldum will help significantly with that imo.I will also be very surprised if Mane doesn't represent a significant upgrade on Lallana, who is one of the least effective footballers in the league, for all that he's pretty on the eye.


We will see on most of this. I still think overall there is a defensive weakness. I'm not really convinced Karius is a significant upgrade on Mignolet, but we will see.

I strongly disagree with the stuff on Mane. To me Mane is a hot and cold player. He plays 1 good game every 6, will score 2 goals and look world class 1 week then go missing the next 5. I also don't see how Liverpool can really fit in all of these players. Mane, Wijnaldum, Coutinho, Firmino, Sturridge, that's pretty unbalanced.

By:
rothko
When: 01 Aug 16 21:04
but will mean there is a good bench
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com