Jul 12, 2016 -- 11:53AM, jed.davison wrote:
That was a valid viewpoint at the time tbf - it was a risk. But there was always the fallback for Gold and Sullivan that the fans had been calling for his head anyway, not like they sacked a geezer who the fans worshipped.
It might have seemed a sensible viewpoint that West Ham had a ceiling of 11th and that only Sam could get them that high . West Ham's fans and owners were mocked by Sam's media mates for thinking they could do better. The fact that the fans/owners were right puts a big hole in Sam's elite manager credentials.
They bought into him.




































































































































