Jun 3, 2016 -- 2:06PM, Muntz Street wrote:
Why is it a year after the last one?It's the 100th anniversary of the first one
It's a money-grab under the guise of an anniversary celebration :)
Jun 4, 2016 -- 2:35AM, ewood wrote:
Gone both teams to score...think evens is reasonable price
0-1
Jun 4, 2016 -- 2:38AM, clacherholiday2 wrote:
looking at how that div jurgen klinsmann has set up i can only see goals
cheers clacher. I took a FH goal on this advice
Jun 4, 2016 -- 3:21AM, ewood wrote:
Was always a worry about US scoring for me.....not much creativity......think Zardes is their best bet of making something happen....wish they played Bradley further upfield too.....he's best passer in their team
they have to go for it now, first game in any tourney have to get the win. Nothing to lose for them now and they have been good and creative, lacking final ball
Jun 4, 2016 -- 3:23AM, ewood wrote:
Good thing about the ref giving that pen is that he will give one for US for any kind of handball too
Yeah set his stall out now, most wouldnt have
Jun 4, 2016 -- 3:24AM, clacherholiday2 wrote:
whenever theyve been pressing the columbians theyve found space, just missing one final pass or cross. they havent hit a low powerful cross yet, everythigns been the floaty **** to the back post i cant stand. im still in shock at that decision for the pen, feel terrible for the americans as theyve given it a go.
spot on mate, that whippy, floaty stuff is bread and butter for defenders. Columbia reverting to form, counter attack football. 2 maybe 3 goals at the death of this game left