|
By:
WD KELLY.GREAT SHOUT.
|
|
By:
wtf ?
Myhill could have walked back and picked that up had the lazy cant bothered |
|
By:
Think Silva will get that won't he?
|
|
By:
the beeb and press assoc given to toure
|
|
By:
Double OG surely and that is why YOU ALWAYS BACK NO GOALSCORER.....
|
|
By:
Definitely won't be an OG. And that's why you take the extra value.
|
|
By:
If the BBC gave it to Toure then it has to be an OG...
|
|
By:
I think you can rule out OG there because first shot was on target.
|
|
By:
Wba refusing to attack,can't sit through this one sided dogs hit again
|
|
By:
No extra value there surely as the game is not 0-0...
|
|
By:
"Silva claiming the goal"..
|
|
By:
They must have no idea what to do now as the whole team talk must have involved playing for 0-0
|
|
By:
I think silva will get it. Regardless of the fact Toure's shot was on target. Hope not though.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Without a doubt it's Silva's goal.
|
|
By:
City tend to do well against workmanlike sides that sit back defensively (Villa, Norwich).
The weaker teams that beat them are the ones that have the 'temerity' to actually attack them (Palace last year, Cardiff and Southampton a couple of seasons ago) |
|
By:
Toure's goal all day…unlucky Silva backers. Everyone giving it to Toure, regardless of slight touch.
|
|
By:
Was there even a touch? My fantasy football team could really use a Silva goal after Rooney and Depay no show on Saturday.
|
|
By:
I've backed Toure so hope you're right, but think it should be silva"s. Agree everyone is giving it to YaYa though. Fantasy Football have too.
|
|
By:
He 100% touched it Texas. And slightly changed the direction of the ball.
|
|
By:
A slight touch is enough to make it Silva's goal.
|
|
By:
was a touch, but I am sure new rules state it has to take a meaningful change in direction. Hence Yaya goal.
|
|
By:
That was an own goal clear as day.
This Country has gone to the dogs.If a deflection takes it past the goalkeeper then the last person to get a touch claims it.. It does not matter if it was on target or not. If a Man City player touched it in would the goal still be credited to Toure as it "was on target". Rant Over... |
|
By:
http://www.soccerstats.com/team.asp?league=england_2015&teamid=37
Every single one of West Brom's 11 Premier League wins last season was with a clean sheet. If West Brom can't keep a clean sheet, they don't win the game. |
|
By:
Of course it matters if it was on target or not. I probably wouldn't bet until you understand the rules tbh.
|
|
By:
boom
|
|
By:
That was Yaya's!
|
|
By:
well that's HIS goal
|
|
By:
hopefully down as a own goal or toure goal as he banged the second
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
No doubt about that one!
|
|
By:
toure,lucky c***
|
|
By:
Ya Ya debate over...
He knew of this debate and settled it... |
|
By:
Great shout on the game Kelly. I got this one all wrong. West Brom look horrific.
|
|
By:
And some people thought that it would be 0-0...
Feck me I was wrong as I thought that WBA would have a pop.. |
|
By:
Digging in deep only works if you have someone up front who can keep it and relive pressure. So far Berahino may as well have stayed at home.
|
|
By:
do WBA score tonite?
|
|
By:
William Hill Betting @WillHillBet 1m1 minute ago
Early indications are that Toure has been credited with the 1st Goal, however we will settle the market once we have official confirmation |
|
By:
Bet Rickie Lambert wishes he was still warming the Liverpool bench..
|
|
By:
|