Real Madrid v Shalke

Mar 10, 2015 -- 10:07PM, Mikael D'Haguenet wrote:

The Special One Joined: 16 Apr 10They could have greened out though at 3-2 if they had any sense, do you understand trading and what a betting exchange is ?? Got to laugh at big dogs like this. They'll lump on at 1.22 pre-KO then lay off a few ticks shorter when their team is winning.

Again you have failed to understand football trading, if you were watching the game then you would have seen that the Galacticos arnt in their usual form, so after going behind twice and then coming back, wouldn't it make sense if you had that position on Real to green out, or at least make your liability on the draw and Schalke to £0 ?? If you couldn't do that after watching up to 3-2 then you shouldn't be football trading, not every game is a team going to play to 100%, the form of any team goes up and down, so having the opportunity to green out when a team is not on top form is like a early Christmas gift

Mar 10, 2015 -- 10:17PM, Coachbuster wrote:

Special one - did you grab any of the 3-3 ?that went from 180 to 100 this afternoon - someone knew ?

No wasn't me that got any of the 3-3, although wish I did! Still think there will be another goal in this

Mar 10, 2015 -- 10:17PM, Mikael D'Haguenet wrote:

The Special One Joined: 16 Apr 10Again you have failed to understand football trading, if you were watching the game then you would have seen that the Galacticos arnt in their usual form, so after going behind twice and then coming back, wouldn't it make sense if you had that position on Real to green out, or at least make your liability on the draw and Schalke to £0 ?? If you couldn't do that after watching up to 3-2 then you shouldn't be football trading, not every game is a team going to play to 100%, the form of any team goes up and down, so having the opportunity to green out when a team is not on top form is like a early Christmas gift  I laid 'em at 1.22 cos I'm not a mug who backs teams based purely on reputation. Laid 'em again at HT, so wasn't pleased when they went 3-2 up. Still, I guarantee my book on this game looks better than yours, but well done anyway.

Your talking nonsense, I don't always back 1.22 shots, Arsenal yesterday were around 3's

As for Reputation, until recently Real were flying, 2-0 up from 1st leg, top of La Liga, banging in goals etc.....

Mar 10, 2015 -- 10:26PM, Mikael D'Haguenet wrote:

The Special One Joined: 16 Apr 10Your talking nonsense, I don't always back 1.22 shots, Arsenal yesterday were around 3'sAs for Reputation, until recently Real were flying, 2-0 up from 1st leg, top of La Liga, banging in goals etc.....Recently? You mean November? Also, being 2-0 up from 1st leg means they didn't have to win tonight. Definitely a shrewd bet at 1.22. Let's have another Schalke!!

Recently as in 2 weeks ago

Mar 10, 2015 -- 10:35PM, The Special One™ wrote:

Is that why they are called SCHALKE 04  ??

Mar 10, 2015 -- 10:36PM, Mikael D'Haguenet wrote:

The Special One Again you have failed to understand football trading... having the opportunity to green out when a team is not on top form is like a early Christmas gift  Well done. And Merry Christmas.

You seem to be SEETHING, funny how you don't post on the Arsenal/manure thread

Mar 10, 2015 -- 10:48PM, DirkDiggler wrote:

Making more friends TSO, good to seeHe should ask Katie Hopkins out.

Mar 10, 2015 -- 10:49PM, Mikael D'Haguenet wrote:

Mikael D'Haguenet Joined: 24 Jun 06Replies: 5114 10 Mar 15 20:00    Madrid have been dire pretty much since the 20 game winning streak, or whatever it was, ended. A good team would KO them. Anyone on them for the outright needs to hope they find some form relatively soon. Obviously this is the post of someone who'd backed Madrid, eh? Luckily for Real, they weren't playing a good team!As for last night, I was out. I rarely post on match threads anyway. I laid Man U at 2.46,

Yes but your a proven FORUM SEETHER as you quickly post on a thread where a tip doesn't come in, but ignores threads where the tip at 3's wins like the Areenal thread, a true sign of a forum SEETHER

Mar 10, 2015 -- 10:47PM, Lifter wrote:

Making more friends TSO, good to see

friends? Jesus Christ are you for real???

on a anonymous internet forum???

I like to keep it REAL, have friends in the real world so why would I need VIRTUAL ONLINE NON-REALITY friends online??

Mar 10, 2015 -- 10:58PM, Lifter wrote:

Im clearly being sarcastic, I was alluding to the fact you cant be civil online. I think you may have a social condition in which case I'll forgive you.

Look at mikelDONUTS post above, I think you will find when people start to use the F word they are SEETHING and have the social condition you are talking about, so you need to go and help your "friend"

Mar 10, 2015 -- 11:03PM, Mikael D'Haguenet wrote:

I'm just keeping it real, SpecialNeedsOne.

using the F word isn't keeping it real, it means you are SEETHING, and not very Civil. Its common lowlife chav language

(as for "keeoing it real", why are you copying what I say? are you a parrott? aren't you intelletucal enough to express yourself?)

Mar 10, 2015 -- 11:10PM, Lifter wrote:

^he was talking the mick (as I say... aspergers)

keeping it real by swearing? again that proves he is SEETHING then, how swearing keeping it real? unless your a lowlife common chav

Mar 10, 2015 -- 11:30PM, Mikael D'Haguenet wrote:

The Special One     10 Mar 15 22:07  (as for "keeoing it real", why are you copying what I say? are you a parrott? aren't you intelletucal enough to express yourself?)Incidentally, I know we all make typographical errors occasionally, but if you're going to question somebody 'intelletucally', it helps if you don't misspell parrot.

Thought you were "keeping it real" ??

This isn't a draft for a newspaper column that's going to be printed in a national newspaper tomorrow, its just a disposable net forum for discussing betting and football games

So why would I go the extra mile and waste energy and time checking grammar and spelling? as long as the post is clear which it looks like it is as your not questioning the meaning of my post

So spelling is the only thing you managed to pick out after I proved you were SEETHING ?