Football
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 571 comments are related to the topic:
Tottenham v Chelsea
Tottenham v Chelsea
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 571
|
By:
First time i have been on the skysports website, look at these ratings.
Player Ratings Tottenham: Lloris (6), Walker (5), Fazio (5), Vertonghen (6), Rose (6), Bentaleb (5), Mason (5), Townsend (6), Eriksen (5), Chadli (7), Kane (9). Used subs: Paulinho (4), Dembele (5), Davies (4). Chelsea: Courtois (5), Ivanovic (5), Cahill (5), Terry (6), Azpilicuaeta (5), Fabregas (6), Matic (4), Willian (5), Oscar (5), Hazard (7), Costa (6). Used subs: Ramires (5), Salah (4). Man of the Match: Harry Kane  |
|
By:
10 = potential top rating???
perhaps |
|
By:
cahill 5, terry 6 ??
Rose 6? he scored and saved a goal ? cant see how any spurs defender scored under 6. |
|
By:
Then it seems that Sky Sports have extremely high standards!!!
|
|
By:
you would think they would want to sell their product
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
8 goal thriller, 4's & 5's all over the shop. What a pathetic firm sky are. cant wait to cancel once they lose the ucl.
well pointed out kelly. |
|
By:
Very well pointed out Kelly.
Although I hope that's not true....disgusting if it is. |
|
By:
Someone posted on chitchat a while back, how can you worry about ripping off a company that hacks the phones of dead people.
Certainly made me think, now i hate sky. give my access codes to everyone. I would like to go to court and say, well is hacking dead peoples phones less than ripping off sky ? |
|
By:
5-3 would be associated more with poor quality than say a 0-0 in the EPL.
entertainment however .... |
|
By:
i understand that coach but 8 of the 15 shots on target hit the net.
|
|
By:
ertainly made me think, now i hate sky. give my access codes to everyone. I would like to go to court and say, well is hacking dead peoples phones less than ripping off sky ?
I feel same way with the bbc paying paedos with our license fee money. |