|
By:
It will be someat to do with this stu:
Preston MK Dons Swindon Chesterfield Peterborough Bristol City Sheff Utd Rochdale Walsall Fleetwood Oldham Leyton Orient Colchester Barnsley Bradford Doncaster Coventry Yeovil Port Vale Scunthorpe Notts County Crewe Crawley Gillingham |
|
By:
Cant believe a few punters lose a bet and now its automatically a fix
![]() |
|
By:
I don't have a clue how you would go about reporting this. Something didn't seem right especially betting before game and during first-half when percentages were often in the range 80% to 120%.
Yes I lost. But football's a game of opinions and unfortunately I, and a lot of other people, called this one wrong. As to whether it was fixed or not there will be some authority monitoring this. Personally I doubt it was fixed. Maybe in a few years time we'll find out. I'll move on and think about things like this in the future before betting. This will be difficult for me as I tend to look for prices I consider to be wrong. Clydebank. If that's the league table it's wrong. Notts are still 6th. |
|
By:
It happens lets move on..
|
|
By:
Agree
|
|
By:
Its not just all about the losing its also the way in which it happened, helping another team to win by scoring an OG and then deliberately handling the ball in the area to give away a penalty is just plain fraud and nothing more than cheating pure and simple
|
|
By:
That is a table based on this season Charlie, it just doesn't take into account the final result. Actually it's a couple of games out of date, but if you compare it to the official table and you picked 2 teams from it who diverged the most from the official table it would be Notts County and Walsall. So the prices didn't surprise me too much
|
|
By:
Clydebank
What's the table based on then? HT results? Game when winning? Ratings from somewhere? |
|
By:
relative strength table Clyde (based on teams played so far)?
|
|
By:
It's rating/performance based. It just ignores the final result.
|
|
By:
Is it your own calculations?
|
|
By:
Bristol City a long way down, don't you think!
|
|
By:
I'd have a thought the final result was important. Maybe time based then e.g. after 60 minutes?
Good game this. |
|
By:
Walsall and Nottingham - two filthy little places. I'd be very tempted to drive up and piss all over their grubby little streets if we didn't have guests coming round for supper.
|
|
By:
I don't live far from Walsall so could go and burn it down if you want.
|
|
By:
You must have a lot of p1ss in you if you can do that...
|
|
By:
No its not mine stu.
|
|
By:
Thanks Charlie, that would be helpful.
|
|
By:
Whoops, I think I've let you down there. Forgot I'd dismissed the chaufferess for the evening.
|
|
By:
Aplogies
chauffeuress |
|
By:
Not a problem Charlie, both of those crime-ridden shanty towns will regrettably still be there tomorrow, so anytime it suits you....
|
|
By:
Once more I must apologise.
Tomorrow is the Sabbath and I have to spread God's word (only he knows why he can't do it himself (lazy ****)). Next week I have to perform that long forgotten pastime called work - most of you idle twats can look that up in a dictionary. Come next Saturday I will be laying the fukc out of Walsall to recover loses occurred. Which will bring me back to Sunday. Until we have a complete month of Sunday's followed by a complete month without Sunday's I'm busy. |
|
By:
Hee hee. Thought today's result might have seen you wheel out your own personal thread Charlie.
|
|
By:
For me I think Sugarfoot's post earlier in the thread offers the best explanation regarding the price of Walsall today... it appears they are over-bet every week when playing away from home... maybe some big punter has been operating the Brimardon system on Walsall's away games and has been splashing a lot of cash week in week out... finally he has got the win he sought...
![]() |
|
By:
only scored 3 away goals prior to yesyerday with no wins 4 losses and 3 draws badly stung
![]() |
|
By:
Yesterday wasn't too bad overall.
Lost quite a lot on Walsall and a bit on Charlton. Liverpool was neutral, won a tiny bit on Baa Baas plus 29.5, won some on Watford, Bournemouth was good for me as was Barca -2. (I think all bets were posted except Baa Baas as nobody reads rugby threads). Today's not really kicked off yet except laid India at very short odds (but doesn't look too good) and laid Nantes at 2.3 who were losing but are now drawing. Can't find a bet on Manchester derby as yet. Laid Bordeaux at 2.3 and Mouscron at 4.5 (but they've shortened to 4.2). Other's still in pipe-line. |
|
By:
Out of Nantes at 2.7 to have a look at Mancs. Anybody got a good suggestion?
|
|
By:
Small bet Citeh 1-0 Ht.
|
|
By:
remember this thread too.
Since this game Notts County got 9 pts from 13 games and Walsall 19 from 12 games. Walsall are now ahead of Notts County |