Biscuit1979
07 Aug 14 20:59
Joined:
16 Nov 10
| Topic/replies: 47,240 | Blogger: Biscuit1979's blog
No win situation for Celtic here.

Either the result stands and they're out or they go through and play a decent side and get knocked out anyway.

Imagine these clowns away to the likes of Steaua or Salzburg.


But if we got hammered in next round we would drop straight i europa groups not have to play a qualifier so there is an edge here

It would also be different if the player had played 180 minutes and scored a goal or 2. But 4 minutes when it was 6-1. Give it up and move on.

just accept they played a banned player and move on is the way it should be ?

i think someone should be banned or fined or booted out

legia warsaw ineligible player on the field .. CELTIC ARE BACK

slightly premature title imo

Guaranteed as soon as this came out Lawwell would of been on the blower trying to get it overturned. No way is he gonna let all that potential dosh go without doing everything he can.

THATS IT SNEAKY PETE WILL SEE $$$$$$£££

the thing is if we appeal and it gets rejected we will look even bigger mugs as someone pointed out we can show some respect and give it up

i would take the tie obviously but cant see it as the 3 games for his suspension where really over

Celtic are looking for the uncrossed 't's or the missing dots on the 'i's to progress to the latter stages.



Small club mentality 

bettorbettor are you not a united fan

could go either way as the result was so close and the player was on the pitch for 2 minutes

was instrumental in all 6 goals according to a Celtic spokesman

seen this on a forum so if this is true the match is forfeited

Hopefully this will clear things up for any latecomers.


1. The Legia player had a 3 match ban hanging over him. He was not registered as part of the squad for the 2nd Qualifying Round against St Pats. Therefore he did not serve his suspension.


2. When he came on last night he was deemed a suspended player.


3. UEFA differentiates between a suspended player participating in a match, and an ineligible player participating in a match.


4. The Rules state

    Quote:
         

    A match *is* declared forfeit if a player who has been suspended following a disciplinary decision participates in the match



and

    Quote:
         

    A match *may* be declared forfeit if a player who is ineligible participates in the match, as long as the opposing team files a protest



Therefore the first rule should be used. The player was suspended, so the match *is* forfeit. Not *may* be forfeit.


5. The Debrecen story is muddying the waters and irrelevant. The Debrecen player was ineligible, not suspended. Debrecen simply made an administrative error and forgot to include him name on the teamsheet. The rule for ineligible players allows for punishment other than forfeit.


6. There have been at least 2 other instances of forfeit games in the last few years due to suspended players playing. Budućnost of Montenegro were awarded a 3-0 win in 10/11 after Baku fielded a suspended player. Mura 05 of Slovenia were given a 3-0 win after Arsenal Kyiv fielded a suspended player.


7. The "List B" thing is a non-starter. Bereszyński was not eligible to be on Legia's "List B". He is too old, and hadn't been at the club for long enough. He also wasn't registered on the list, according to the UEFA site.


8. If UEFA follow their rules to the letter they should decide on a forfeit. But who knows if there is some other regulation buried away in there which will allow them to reduce the punishment.


9. What a complete red neck it'd be.

Barcelona here we come

Barcelona will be quaking

Setting my cletic alarm on my clock, watch, mp4 players and celtic laptop, will be up early

bhoys

themover
07 Aug 14 23:30
Joined:
25 Apr 03
| Topic/replies: 31,163 | Blogger: themover's blog
odds of Celtic qualifying - 10/1
odds of The Bhoys being up at 9am - 999/1




is it 10/1 or just your odds