BRENDAN RODGERS

he is unbearable now, could you imagine if he did win something - he'd be so much up his own ar$e he'd get lost

tbf (and im not a rodgers fan) this is clearly in response to murinios comments recently.

you give it you take it.
if you cant take it dont ******* give it

whats he said dr?

he wont win anything

Liverpool manager Brendan Rodgers has had a cheeky dig at Premier League rivals Chelsea, describing them as a "really good club" - but not a "massive" one like the Reds.

It came as the Northern Irishman was discussing Victor Moses, currently on-loan at Anfield from Jose Mourinho's side.

Moses has this week sat down with the Reds boss, with Rodgers explaining his reasons for substituting the Nigerian international at half-time in the FA Cup win over Oldham last weekend.           

And Rodgers feels that what is important for Moses is to come to terms with being at a "big club."

"It’s not easy when you come to a big club," he told the Liverpool Echo.

"You come from a really good club like Chelsea to a massive club like Liverpool where there is expectancy every day.

"For any player to go into a big club is a huge difference in terms of mentality.

"He’s a good kid and I’m delighted to have him here. I’ve got no doubt that over the course of time here he will show his talent. I still expect him to make a big contribution in the second half of the season."

so boo to Brendan for stating the obvious. alright then

spot on brendan , moses living the high life in london , hes been playing sh1te since he came

Seemingly the lowlife in Liverpool must have go to him , then ..

Anytime backer for me now

liverpool were a big club many years ago if you ask anyone under 25 they would say livepool are a top 6 side now

To be fair the burden of being expected to finish above Everton every year can get to the best of players.

Neil Mellor could have been better than Messi if only he'd had the mental strength to cope with that pressure.

Liverpool are clearly a bigger club. But would that bother 23 year old Moses? Not really, Rogers talks about the need for expectancy every day. Moses wasnt even alive the last time Liverpool won the league, Chelsea have won it 3 time in the last 9 years so I doubt very much it matters to Moses

not seen him put a shift in yet , todays the day moses lad

Expectation

Hello this is planet Earth..

Chelsea are a far bigger club than Liverpool and have been for 20 years...

How does such a mild mannered, softly spoken, likeable gentleman like Brendan Rodgers manage to send Betfair forumites into such a tizzy!

Chelsea are reknowned for being a vile club. Liverpool are a much bigger more real club to play for imho.

Chelsea will never have or will ever be a 'big' club.

For the simple reason that is Roman takes away his billions Chelsea will fall away.

Your Liverpools, Barcelonas, Real Madrids of this world will always be there.

Liverpool in the same sentence as Barcelona and Real Madrid....I haven't seen that for 20 years

You are right Mover, perhaps I shouldnt have included Real Madrid

Delusional much ...

the mover Liverpool have beaten both those teams in their own backyard not that long  ago, just incase you were unaware.

Feck me in the UK there is a big debate about how much Man Utd are in debt.In five years it will be paid off love or hate the Glaziers..

Those Spanish Clubs owe so much that it would bankrupt the Country (again)..

Liverpool are a former top team.

homefortea Man U are in no great shape. Ageing team needs replacing doesnt come cheap, hopefully no Champs League to pay for it. Big worries for that shower

There is a difference between being a big club and a club doing well. How can anybody even compare the size of these two clubs? Look at the worldwide fanbase, I could get a home or away ticket for Chelsea every week... not that I'd want to wave a plastic flag around all game and sit there quietly.

worldwide fanbase?

how do you measure that?

sale of replica shirts maybe?

have a look, you may be surprised.

anyone who knows football knows liverpool are a proper club and im a utd fan,chelsea is just a play thing,a d1ldo of a football club,

Chelsea are a medium to large size club with a lot of money.

it would seem that the supporters of the "oncewerebeens" are circling the wagons together

they'll have a joint pop at city next.

chelsea have to win a lot more before they are classed as a 'Big' club

please tell me how long lpool can go on winning very little before they cease to be this massive club that some think they are?

how longs a piece of string?who gives a flying f***,tell the mongs club on here

football comes in cycles mexi

liverpool made the most of their main cycle, man u theirs

perhaps chelsea will manage similar feats but they have a long way to go

i'm not arguing the t0ss

its a bit of fun this thread tbh

nothing to get serious about and my comments are very much tongue in cheek!

you're dead right about football being cylical, when i first started going to football liverpool were a 2nd division club.

if roman walked away do you think no one would come in and buy chelsea fc your living in a dream land.its the area the club is in sw london odds on another russian or arab family would buy the club and spend more money your lucky we have roman

If Dave Whelan banged £900m into Wigan and they won the Premiership would they be a bigger club than Liverpool?

Simple.

i'm not banging on about money

we've waisted so much over the years on mediocre players on ridiculous wages

it was such mis management by the club that led to our demise in the first place imo

Surely everyone knows that Brenda signed Moses to lead Liverpool out of the wilderness.

everybody knows london is the best city in the world and when you have a club in the richest brough enough said

london best city in the world,not even in top fckn ten

and thats just for the uk

Scraps
Date Joined:     01 Jun 08
Add contact | Send message
13 Jan 14 11:31 Joined: 01 Jun 08 | Topic/replies: 39 | Blogger: Scraps's blog
If Dave Whelan banged £900m into Wigan and they won the Premiership would they be a bigger club than Liverpool?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

probably not. but if he then banged millions into worldwide  marketing,that increased the clubs profile and turnover built a bigger stadium, that was full every game, sold more shirts than lpool worldwide,and won leagues and cups on a regular basis. what would then be your criteria for saying they weren't bigger?

poor ol' rommel, incapable of recognising the delights of the greatest city in the world.

c'mon doc,even jose understands where chelsea stand on the ladder of british clubs,shoulder to shoulder with Aston Villa.

Seems a daft argument Chelsea have won multiple league titles and probably every club cup that to me makes them a big club imo

You can argue if they are bigger or not than liverpool whose title and cup haul is also impressive

Players and managers always make these comments Torres did it when he moved its something fans of each club like to hear or not depending which side your on

no offence to aston villa supporters

its the greatest city in the world we let the northern teams have a day out at wembley now and then why do england play at wembley why does the queen have buckingham palace why do people all over the world come to london its the greatest you dont see them going to manchester or liverpool do you

try and buy a house in london they start at 400,000, i can go and see robbbie flowler and buy one for 8,grand in liverpool two streets away from liverpools ground slums are us

the only people who go to manchester are the irish to watch utd

A car parking space in Chelsea probably costs 200k!

london ****,rich **** yes

s h i t h o l e

be like the yank cities soon london,take a wrong turn and youre a deadun pal

biscuit1979 no thats just a hut where the parking officer sits

of course you are right doc.

why didn't roman buy lpool ,or everton? because he didn't want to go there every week looking at the khazi of a place knowing he was blowing his money in that god forsaken place, he didn't buy utd, cos he thought he'd leave that to someone who wanted to fleece their hapless misguided fans, and he wouldn't touch city with a bargepole because they're all potty up there.

we are truly blessed to have him as an owner, and it all came about because we're are from the best part of the greatest city on this planet.

we are truly blessed to have him as an owner, and it all came about because we're are from the best part of the greatest city on this planetno schools down there then?

no mate, just two bedroom apartmets worth 5 and a half mill

alright for multi millionaires then,rest of you fckd year on year

rommel

i can see why you don't live in london, you just wouldn't fit in.

went to uni in london

must have been very scary.

only the people in sombreros

There's a definite north south divide when it comes to football honours imo

Roman bought Chelsea cos they were v cheap (and very tax efficient) considering the amount of land they own etc (wd ken bates for running them into the ground before) nowt to do with history or size or football at all really. As for London (Chelsea) house prices that'll be (mainly) the Russian (mafia) keeping prices high so 'ordinary' British people are priced out of living in many parts of central London - esp Chelski - now the Chinese are following Roman's example. Wd Roman for that - the less British there are in London all the more room for the rich (tax) tourists.......

by the way are liverpool fc still trying to get the residents near the ground out on the cheap

is brenda still poking the coach driver?

spyker

the inner part of south west london has always been in the very top bracket for property prices.

regarding when he bought them, they were a team in the aformentioned location who were in the champions league [and have been ever since].

i suppose it backs up your prejudices to blame roman and chelsea for the high property prices even though they are baseless in fact.

the top and bottom of it is that prices have always been at the top of the market because it's one of the most delightful areas in the greatest city on the planet.

not even in top ten in uk mex',this is faxxxxx

i'm always wary of people who like to declare an ill guided opinion as fact.

Chelsea by the river, lovely place to live. Better than the slum that is Liverpool.

ill guided opinion!!!?try and talk sense,it helps

thind is harry you cant afford to live there,neither can mex,eat sh**

thing*

Fulham Broadway one of the nicest places to live?

I'm in Putney, ain't much cheaper.

putney ahhh the venice of the uk,sh**hole

where do you live rommel?

cheshire

And you are a right mug if you think I really live there. You thick scouse tw at.

nah havent been to putney for 30 years,dont know what its like now

well you told me you lived there,you foul mouthed fckn dolt

RAFA OUT!!

harry2.1 • January 13, 2014 1:09 PM GMT
The contents of this post have been hidden for this blocked user.     [Manage blocked users]

great the ole mong eliminator innit

Wow... Gone from asking who is a bigger club out of Chelsea and Liverpool (no contest) to having to resort to asking where is a nicer place to live out of a council estate in Liverpool or Chelsea by the river. Obviously all of the Chelsea fans on here do and are writing on this forum from their yacht?

Anyone remember Chelsea's victory parade after they won the Champs League? It was laughable, a few streets and maybe 100k there. Shows how their support stands up to the likes of Liverpool and Man Utd. When Liverpoool won the Champs League there were estimated between 500k and 1 million on the streets. Man Utds treble parade was also immense.

Chelsea parade consisted of driving the bus past Romans house

Take a look at Blackburn for your future and enjoy the present whilst it lasts.

Brendan merely trying to play Jose at his own game, after all, where did he receive his education in such things...?

Let me think now, I wonder why on earth there were only a few streets used for Chelsea's CL parade?

Dearie me.

Didnt Chelsea win a European trophy before Liverpool? Chelsea the only english club to win the Cup winners cup European Cup and UEFA Cup. Of course we aren't as big a club as Liverpool, but people really do know little to nothing about Chelsea including how many fans they had when they were sh it.
Mock away, it s much like the fans who go on about '66. Keep your chins up Liverpool and Rogers it's 24 years on May of expectation

Chelsea are reknowned for being a club full of pikeys with pikey fans. Truly pathetic club.

I know mate not like those upstanding citizens. Rooney RVP Rio Giggs Those are top blokes

fck lot of hurt going on here,let it all ooot boys

Just think RMB is a bit gutted we got Roman and they got the yanks. Shame really. Give it 20 years and FC United will be up and running