Lampard or OG?

Looked clearly lampards goal to me, sky and score saying cattermole og which would make borini fgs in the markets

I'd be gutted if on Lampard tho

stoke based company  have paid out as borini.

I am on Lampard. Lets hope common sense prevails.

bf settle as official sources,  lampard almost certain to b ignored.

Dec 17, 2013 -- 9:54PM, hop wrote:

I am on Lampard. Lets hope common sense prevails.

I'm on Frank too, but know i am pissing into the wind

Was an og. Will correctly go down as Borini fgs.

settled as Borini, so Lampards touch wasn't going in hans ? sky fekkers keep saying Lampards goal

Feel for Lampard backers. But wouldn't have gone in without Cats touch.

Backers need consistency with these. Not all the comm b0llocks of Lampard deserves it and Cat doesn't want it.

There is a consistency with them. That is if the original shot or header was on target it's deemed to be the attacking player's goal.

For some reason "official sources" and it seems yourself have decided to deviate from that.

It was Lampard's goal no question.

Can't agree.

Was more like a shot on target being prevented from going in by the defender.

Who's own momentum then put the ball in the net.

Without the defenders 2nd touch it wouldn't have gone in.

Regards it was "Lampards goal no question." This seems to be the opinion of an ex pro and Lampard backers.

All official sites called it correctly as an OG.

how many of lampards career goals have been deflectios id say min 33%

more than 33%, probably just over half

I'd say 75% plus

i was saying 33% as very least , but it seems he has had a lot of deflected goals , so how good is he really

just a lucky Luke chdwick

Chadwick

The Chelsea goal scored at Sunderland in the Capital One Cup on Tuesday night is credited to Frank Lampard.

It was reported in sections of the media as an own goal by Lee Cattermole but the Football League has informed Chelsea FC that the referee on the night, Anthony Taylor, confirmed the goal as scored by Lampard.

Oh what a surprise.

This affect settlement of bets or not? Cheers.

I can't imagine people taking their winnings back

ref must have been on lampard

Betfair might reverse payouts idk. Should do really

The worst one recently was the one Suarez was given when it was heading about 3 yards wide until it took a wicked deflection. So the rule of initially being on target is not always applied.

I presume it'll still be settled as an own goal because just about all betting firms go on the Press Association goalscorer I think.

The fact anyone tried to claim it was an own goal under all the criteria ever used for disputed goalscorers was ludicrous in the first place.