Football
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 273 comments are related to the topic:
Brighton v Watford
Brighton v Watford
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 273
|
By:
a few clear chances for over 2.5
|
|
By:
but 1-1 fair result
|
|
By:
Maybe so cs2007 but there have been 3 goals scored!
|
|
By:
**** off
|
|
By:
OMFG thought they were gonna do it then. 1-1 ft
|
|
By:
Game over. FFS.
|
|
By:
dsojf[eoifwgrwr **** **** ****
|
|
By:
FCUKING SHOOT FFSSSSSSS omg
|
|
By:
You fecking retards ..Tippy tappy c0ck-stains
 ... |
|
By:
Dodgy as you like. Ref was determined that Watford were not to win that.
|
|
By:
Greer - too close to tell if it was over - P*SS OFF, be a man and just admit that it was over
|
|
By:
unacceptable ref
|
|
By:
Absolute pish. I hope the linesman and ref sh*te hedgehogs the rest of their days.
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
daveygfc • October 28, 2013 9:59 PM GMT
Absolute pish. I hope the linesman and ref sh*te hedgehogs the rest of their days Bergkamp93 • October 28, 2013 9:55 PM GMT You fecking retards ..Tippy tappy c0ck-stainsAngry... Some quality seething here.... |
|
By:
relax guys league cup tml
|
|
By:
FFS what are the Sky Comms on about?
There is no way that "The ball is clearly over the line." And why dod they keep showing the view from in front of the goal as proof that it did? How can they determine the curvature of the ball from that angle? They have a perfectly good side-on view that looks like the ball hasn't crossed. Totally embarrassing. |
|
By:
TV technology, should be used, which is easily done for all League games, but will they do anything about it, no we'll just have it in the Premier League. You can't blame the ref, the lino, should have been able to see it, but he obviously had some doubt, so no goal given and it is very hard for a lino to see things, at speed from 25 metres, with a goal post in the way.
|
|
By:
Christmas comes early. Unders odds on, yet
the draw at 3.8 pre kick off. Should have been nearer 3.3. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
kenilworth Joined: 04 Nov 05
Replies: 12547 28 Oct 13 19:36 Hard to understand why the draw is 3.65 when unders is odds on. kenilworth Joined: 04 Nov 05 Replies: 12547 28 Oct 13 19:36 Hard to understand why the draw is 3.65 when unders is odds on. GEESUSS, no after timing from me. |
|
By:
He mentioned it near the start of the thread to be fair
|
|
By:
That doesn't say back the draw though, does it? Could equally be lay unders?
|
|
By:
stu, I said the draw price was out of line with 'unders'
price, I didn't say the 'unders' price was wrong. I also didn't say back anything, I never do, jut that IMO the draw price was too big for an 'unders' price of odds on. 'overs/unders' prices are usually in tandem with the draw price. |
|
By:
Fair enough Ken - just that you didn't say it was too big or small either (or what to back), but I get your point.
|
|
By:
cough!! what was the final score
|
|
By:
cough!! what was the final score
|
|
By:
cough!! what was the final score
|
|
By:
cough!! what was the final score
|
|
By:
cough!! what was the final score
|
|
By:
cough!! what was the final score
|
|
By:
oops
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Great pick Johnny
|