|
By:
did you ever let a losing punter have their money back because they said their bet was a palpable error?
|
|
By:
YEEEEAH BUDDY
|
|
By:
It depends.
Clearly, one would need to seek Plato's advice on the absolute morality of it, but my own take on it is this: If it were you, who I presume were an independent operator, and would probably have been known personally to most of your punters, then no it is not all right. Sadly though, the High Street chains have corrupted the old-fashioned idea of bookmaking to such a degree, then they must be fair game. I do not see how any organization which foists FOBTs on the public in the full knowledge that they destroy families and lead to hopeless addiction, and which weeds out with extreme prejudice anyone who looks like they may have half an idea about how to get an edge, which pays its staff the mimimum wage and sacks them on a whim, can be granted the full protection of the punters' code of honour. The thread to which you refer is obviously the one about the 1000/1 winner, do you really think that the incompetence displayed by the bookmaker in question - if indeed the whole thing is not an apocryphal story - is deserving of your moral indignation? |
|
By:
My question is: how were they ill-gotten goods exactly? At no point have I been told what their supposed correct odds should have been. As far as I'm concerned, I accepted the odds being offered and duly withdrew my winnings which I'm perfectly entitled to do.
If someone wanted £1000 on a 1/10 when it should have been 11/10, would you give it back if they had lost? If they had won, would you return £1100 or £2100? |
|
By:
kenilworth - if you'd placed a bet in good faith, seen it come home, gone to the store to collect, checked with them that it was ok, they'd said it was and they'd paid you, you'd left with the cash and only a few hours later they'd decided it was wrong odds and contacted you demanding their money back and hadn't even offered to pay you at their so called 'correct' odds, then you're saying you'd happily be giving the bookie back their £950 this morning would you?
No chance, i think you're just playing devil's advocate here. |
|
By:
I once respected bookmakers until they started robbing punters with machines as their principal business. Take peanuts bets but take as much as you want in a machine designed to take your money. High Street Highwaymen now
|
|
By:
bookies deserve to be robbed, if you win your banned, place a large bet your band, take the best price your banned.. so clean em out when you get the chance
|
|
By:
I'm neutral here. I would certainly say I don't consider it cheating though.
Coral once refused to pay me 'because the price had changed right at the time of the bet', and the guy had mistakenly given me a better price. Hardly a palp, I just got slightly worse odds (at which I wouldn't have bet in the first place). I would say that's MORE unfair than what happened with the guy you allude to, and if the biggest bookmakers do this, it's very hard to feel sorry for them. Also, being a pro on Betfair, I've had to live with accidentally backing 1.01 for 2k on overs instead of unders (when I used to use the website that doesn't have functionality to stop this), effectively throwing the money away and a few similar mistakes that cost me loads. As I can't recover that, it's once again difficult to feel empathy with the bookies. They have the massive luxury of palps, and if even with that they still pay out and don't find their mistake, at some point you have to say it's over. |
|
By:
Bookmakers are as outdated as black n white tvs. Mainly cause of price fixing not taking bets etc
|
|
By:
true - once they got the machines in, they basically took on the moral status of crack dealers.
|
|
By:
I walk past a bookies on my home every night, in it i often see:
1. A bored looking staff member sitting behind the counter 2. 2 people (not always the same 2) playing FOBT's 3. Rest of the shop completely empty |
|
By:
Kenneth and co.
In a time where the richest are screwing the poorest the hardest, do you really think anybody is suppose to have sympathy with a bookmaker? This covers the ground of good faith, good faith in the betting industry especially on sites like this where where we're all trying to wrestle money from each other, is about as pertinent as a Greek bankers IOU. Somebody every now and then keeps putting an AVON catalogue through my front door, very next day she's back with a card through the door, "I hope you're enjoying our catalogue, please leave outside your door for us to collect once your finished, regards", If you put something into someone's hand and walk away, it's no longer your property. hth. |
|
By:
I haven't been to a bookies for years. What are they like these days?
|
|
By:
The crooks have bought purple in a desperate attempt to carry on cheating the public. It won't work the shops here in harpenden will be empty this afternoon and the public laughing when one of them make up a fictitious half million pound bet again
|
|
By:
it makes me laugh when you hear how someone put down 100k etc on a bet... how do they do this i cant get 27p on @ stanjames on a treble
|
|
By:
Well they're not smokey now Johnny
![]() |
|
By:
also, they're mostly fair game because of their adverts. that w!lliam h!ll one with the speccy tw@t doing the power point presentation makes me want to kill.
|
|
By:
Yes the stories about the suitcases full of cash at the counter
![]() |
|
By:
They are so antiquated that here you can't even use a bank card and if you walk in with more than a couple hundred they act like a robbery is in progress
|
|
By:
The bookmakers have always been the enemy to the punters.
Return my first trip to Newbury in the eighties. After a close finish, one bookie whipped out a board and was betting on he distance. Prices were 11/10 a head , 7/4 a short head and 4/1 a dead heat. Stood there as others were shouting imaginary bets. A few punters had their fivers and tenners on. Result was a neck. Zero sympathy for them ever since. Now they are heading towards extinction. |
|
By:
Johnny_Mustang 12 Mar 13 12:14
I haven't been to a bookies for years. What are they like these days? My local one is always empty apart from losers burning their cash on FOBT's The one in central london near my work is always full of Chinese men betting on anything |
|
By:
The eye watering figures those machines take makes me sick. Yes its people choice to put it in the machine but come on last year the takings of them averaged £168 per person in Britain when divided by the population!
Should they be cheated? NO But i dont think them making a mistake and then asking for the money back and you saying no is cheating, and after all the dirty tricks they get up to which they dont call cheating i say fair game. |
|
By:
i have a coral near me, no lie, its a treble fronted shop ****g huge... i walk in on a sat to put me dads footy on and its me, and 4 guys on the fob's in the corner...
|
|
By:
Biscuit "The one in central london near my work is always full of Chinese men betting on anything"
Plus ca change, plus ca la meme chose! |
|
By:
Nice typical story from Harry They are not much better than the find the lady teams
There wil be some great betting at Cheltenham this week 39 runner 12 fences and evens the fav and two and a half the second fav and mugs wading in desperate after losing take the odds The tent thing springs straight to mind in the first |
|
By:
Just a last thought a lot do say the major bookies are behind the endless site collapses on here I'm not so sure but I'm sure they would if they could
|
|
By:
Yes bookies and banks are fair game.
|
|
By:
A few years ago i put a grand bet over the phone with victor chandler and they called me to say that there was a problem with the money being taken and could they take it now, by this time the horse had lost, all calls are recorded as we know, i explained that i no longer have the money and that was the end of the matter. About the only time i have had any little fortune with our bookmaker friends.
|
|
By:
if i oversteak a bet, will the bookies bust a gut to track me down, if i back a non runner ditto, if i plaice my bet after their start time and the bet is voided will they track me down ???
if they make a mistake in my favour is it my duty to track them down .... |
|
By:
I've been out all day. Quite a response! None of them justify keeping
money they are not entitled to IMO. |
|
By:
Ken, they're fair game if it's a game of football which is live on the telly
|
|
By:
I've been overpaid by bookies a few times, I just assumed that it must be some generous offer they were running that I was unaware of when placing the bet.
|
|
By:
What did I miss? Link the particular thread please
|
|
By:
Bookmakers are 100% for profit and don't value customers at all unless they lose all the time.
Fair game if ever I saw some. |
|
By:
you didn't answer the question ken
|
|
By:
occupational hazzard ken
take it off bottom line under bad debts |
|
By:
I'd love to know why I'm being branded a cheat here, I really would. Please explain the following to me ken:
With the SAME bookmaker only 2 days prior to my win, I tried to get £20 on a 6/5 on a selection that shortened to 11/10. Their rules state that if a price shortens as your bet is being placed (there were 4 seconds left on the clock) then it will be rejected and you will be given the chance to accept the new odds. If the price lengthens, it will be auto accepted at the longer odds. I argued that I wasn't given the chance to accept the new odds. They claim that I should indeed have been offered the chance, but will not be refunding me. Is this also considered cheating? Breaking their own rules to suit themselves? Also once had a £25 double at 4/9 and 2/5 with a different bookmaker. 2/5 won, but when I checked my statement the 4/9 had been accepted as 1/100. I got straight onto them (as the match was still being played) saying that the odds were 4/9 and still were, can they change it to the right odds. The selection won and they said no, we're settling at 1/100. Argued it several times with no joy. Is this fair? Is this cheating? I suppose it's fine because as the bookie you'd take this stance too right? |
|
By:
in the old days, tesco used to have a "double the difference" policy when they cheated you at the checkout. Anyone guess why that was?
The answer will imo settle the OP's question and ocuktinsky's issue. |
|
By:
Biscuit,
Are you referring to your post at 10:37? if so I don't and don't answer hypothetical questions. You shouldn't be giving opinions when you don't know all the facts, except if you can't resist a cheap swipe at bookmakers. |