Dec 22, 2012 -- 2:54PM, Why so serious? wrote:
Will either be a 2-0 scruffy game with goals coming 2nd half or 6-0/7-0 and a complete rout.No chance Man City don't win this game.
Agreed.
Dec 22, 2012 -- 2:45PM, Bruce Willis wrote:
0-0 at 44JustCan't Resist2Pound
ho ho ho
Dec 22, 2012 -- 3:50PM, thecookiemonster wrote:
I continue to wonder how long more Madcini will keep his job, i wouldent leave him manage an off license.
Problem is not only Mancini. This team is just a sum of stars like Real Madrid, not a real team like Man United or Barcelona, who play with closed eyes.
Dec 22, 2012 -- 3:51PM, indijs wrote:
got 0:0 @48. need to green out?
How much you put on? I only put £5 in the end. Bought some back
Dec 22, 2012 -- 4:09PM, Bruce Willis wrote:
Dec 22, 2012 -- 3:51PM, indijs wrote:got 0:0 @48. need to green out?How much you put on? I only put £5 in the end. Bought some back
4eur. U already greened?
the rest are bottlers. If they cant beat Reading at home then it says it all.
Dec 22, 2012 -- 4:32PM, Bergkamp93 wrote:
City Score 90+ NAP !!





TOLD YAAAAAAA ...IT WAS INEVITABLE 




Dec 22, 2012 -- 5:04PM, GODSEND wrote:
perfect example as to why trading is the way forward....the coonts would still try and argue that backing City in-play was more value than laying your initial bet
Depends on the cases. You are right about games like this, as I told back there it would be a close victory, but you do not lay games like Barcelona, not even with 22 blokes from Reading hiding inside the box.
Dec 22, 2012 -- 11:07PM, RLKingPunter wrote:
they havent played well since adam johnson got flogged imo
SPOT ON