Clattenburg "wants compensation"

all stems from that incorrect sending off

sure clattenberg acted in good faith too ....

25 pts    Relegation.?  They are gonna cop it
  The only good thing Chelsea will get out of this is the utterly useless mikel  will be finished and will be unlikely to play for them again when it all comes out and expect  roman to sue him for breach of contract he's done it before and will again
Back on the poor bus for mikel.
Crouch must be laughing his head off

only if he reads your latest "contribution!

What bout mikel getting three months bird mex he did threaten to break his legs and it took half the squad to hold him back   Clatts was apparently really shook up

ffs stop it.

i'll die of laughter

A certain person is suing people for false allegations, maybe they should all claim........done in good faith?

F a have charged him police next he did kick the door down  as well roman could be after criminal damage charge
It was also the last nail in bobbys coffin so he might sue mikel as well lol

so have i got this correct, just to sum up


mikel to be charged
no case to answer regards racism
clattenberg totally cleared
everyone thinks its a disgrace (except chelsea fans)

did these people go through "the correct channels"? and did the "correct channels" find that they made the allegations !in good faith"?

well done in being wrong in your summing up

everyone thinks it's a disgrace?

are you advocating that if people think they've been racially abused they shouldn't report it?

the kicking down of the door and the stress it would have caused was a sickening act...he would never have dreamt it was a player, it was a controversial game, he would have had every reason to believe he was under attack by an irate fan/fans

rearrange

straws at clutching.

so mexicano a random bloke goes to the cops

''excuse me officer i think i may have been racially abused but im not sure...i heard nothing but my non english speaking mate thinks he might have heard something''

''look son feck off and stop wasting police time''

Also as I posted at the time one player had said that before he went nuts  some of the team were on mikel s back for his performance  and  not one member of the team wanted to stand up for him afterwards
He's a very threatening guy even JT is careful of winding him    allegedly

Did I miss the bit where Chelsea case was Clatts might have said something off, would you mind checking with the other official and TV to see if it was a mistake?  If not, this is backtracking baloney of epic proportions.

Black lawyers very quiet,have been brought onside and had it explained to them(very slowly)that if they persist it will not be in chelsea players interest.FA have made this clear behind closed doors..not in public

I find it remarkable that anyone including Chelsea fans can defend their clubs actions. It was always a 1000/1 shot that Clattenburg was guilty and to go ahead and make the allegations was totally moronic. Chelsea's top officials really need to take a good look at themselves for being so stupid. Clattenburg's career will always be tainted when he has done nothing wrong. He should take them to the cleaners.

what should they have done?

they passed on what they had in good faith [fa report]

they had it investigated by outside lawyers.

are you advocating that they should have hushed it up?

more humiliation for chelski

avvin a bad time of it arent they.

luvit

Chelsea behaved entirely properly (FA statement) do you not understand English ,now if Mikel is found to have acted wrongly ,he may be disciplined as an individual .

mexicano why do you keep quoting that fa statement as a form of defence of your player yet you ridiculed the fa's john terry statement..double standards??

Chelsea behaved entirely properly

a bunch of words that somehow don't sit together comfortably

Take it up with the FA then !!

i didn't their statement.

i disagreed with them going above the law of the land.

does the fa saying that the allegations were made in good faith not sit comfortably with your point of view?

again was that your john terry attitude? fa were right take it up with them? nope thought not

good faith and chelsea should NEVER be seen in the same sentence...

Chelsea behaved entirely properly

i took the view that having been found not guilty that should have been that.

Mex - what exactly are you saying they presented?  The Chief exec appeared to rule out 'mis-hearing' in an interview.  Hence, if the player(s) said they definitely heard something offense why on earth no Chelsea statement saying they are disappointed with the outcome?  Do they have SO little belief in their own players.

That's mikel s second racism accusation 
He tried to get crouch done for racism for daring to say foreign players were better at diving than Brits ffs.
INot a clever guy mr mikel he should also have been done for bunging over the utd  caper and  didn't one of his friends once say he had lied about his real age to seem like a promising young player and he was in fact  at least five years older than he claimed. That's maybe why he seems so slow now  cause he's  about 40
Another criminal charge maybe lying bout your date of birth for a work permit
Another six months bird mex?

clattenberg has been found not guilty, mikel has a case to answer for excessive threatening behaviour

and chelsea have been found to have acted in good faith and properly.

lol you just cling to that one sentence and tell yourself everythings rosy in the chelsea garden

How did Suarez score against Chelsea. When they are so good at defending  against racists.     Joke joke I also believe he was hard done by

who's saying that?

i'm just pointing out what the fa have said about the clubs conduct in this affair, in reply to all the idiots who are talking about all sorts of action being taken against the club.

oh sorry so clattenberg isnt suing and mikel isnt being charged? i stand corrected

you must try and keep up mate.

wher did i say mikel isn't being charged.

and i think you'll find that clattenberg is "consiering" legal action.

long way from instituting proceedings,

Chelsea are getting sued by the refs. Union for starters

no they're not

Mikel has been charged by the FA

They are mex  fact

good luck to chelsea with getting any borderline decisions in their favour anytime soon

If Clattenburg had been found guilty he would have had a life ban from refereeing certainly at top level. Jon Obi Mikel should be banned for life for deliberately trying to end a referee's career. If he was sued for libel he could face a hefty payout as well.

At the end of the day everyone except some at Chelsea know the only action sensible to take here was (at most) the manager or senior exec going in private to Clatts & referees & FA official - this boys upset says you said something....I didnt, we didnt hear that...thanks, good night.

refs union demanding apology and compensation from CFC.

Doubt they have the class to say sorry from what ive seen of them lately,but money dont matter to them,so compensation is a real possibility.

human nature mex human nature

has john terry still got a standing order at the bank for his compo pay outs?

keep up mexy lad.

would chelsea fans view be different if it wasn't their club involved ?

More proof if needed how utterly fukked this stupid game has become

If Chelsea aren't totally hammered for this the game should die

They chose to throw their weight behind this frivolous repulsive accusation despite there being no case to answer

The player concerned should be given a massive ban and fine and sanctions against Chelsea should be damning

There is no way anyone who can talk / walk and read could make a racist case against Clattenburg so it was born out of something else , whatever it waas was calculated and with malice

I actually hate the game nowadays for what it has become even though I still take an interest in the results etc and of course betting opportunities but it is a fukkin disgrace and represents everything that could be rancid and bad in a "sport"

EWWW:  spot on mate.

if it wasn't their club involved?

i would expect any organisation were an employee made an allegation of racial abuse to proceed through the "proper channels". if they then went further and spaent time, and a fair bit of money to try and acertain the facts, and then proceed on the advice of the independant legal team, i would probably say they'd acted in good faith.

it seems that edward is at odds with the fa here.

As for this mexican fella , I have to admit I have not read this thred in it's entirity but he must be Abramovic's lost love child the way that tool has been preaching about the virtues of Chelsea

They are a club I really liked and used to love going to the Bridge in the 90's & 80's but they are now a fukking joke of a club and even my pals who are staunch blue bloods are disgusted by what they have become

Racist players / a manger per week and now accusing refs of racism with ZERO evidence

THROW THE FUKKIN BOOK AT THIS FILTH OF AN OUTFIT

totally agree

and a skipper with a list of shame that would fill this page...

with both posts edward.

pmsl at chelsea fans trying to defend the club.
embarrassing!!

EWWWW: 

correct.  all true chelsea fans deserted the club a long time ago.  todays so called fans are mostly a bunch of  nerdy 'followers' who latched on to the mourinho hype.

it must really stick in you little mobs throats that in spite of all the bile being spouted by you that chelsea have been found to have acted in good faith.

not fair is it?

MEX

You are a bell end mate

Proper channels my hairy arse

If one of my employees made an accusation as SERIOUS as that especially in the light of Chelseas recent history I would first take the time to get to the bottom of " what actually happened" ffs

Never would I blindly back a person who had just come off a feild in a abd mood after losing a game where the ref had a nightmare

You should give up defending this shower you nutter, they are guilty of being as bad as anyone for throwing their weight behind the idiot player without checking first if anything actually happened

THROW THE BOOK AT THIS VILE CLUB

Gnight

Mex

You are on an island on your own here moppet

If you cant see the wrong that has happened you must need help getting dressed you dribbling fool

"Proper" channels the fact that Chelsea released that **** statement says more about them than anything believing they were right to back a player despite there being no case to answer

You mug

bell end

Try and leave club bias out of this.

An employer receives a complaint from an employee that he has been racially abused.

Should they tell him "You are on your own with that" or ask the regulatory body to investigate the matter?

dribbling fool


cracking up here

off subject this regime hes slavishly arselicking, is the same regime that treat their employees like sh!t....win the champions league and get sacked, only at chelsea ffs

me too budd

dribbling fool

as per ed you're letting your prejudices get in the way.

they had it investigated independently [at great cost] before the made any official complaint.

i know it irks you little mob that have been telling anybody who's been prepared to listen that, everyone was going to throw the book at chelsea.

but keep spouting your prejudiced bile if it makes you feel better.

but remember this.

the fa said chelsea acted properly, and in good faith.

and i know the more you think about that.

the madder you'll get.

life aint fair is it?

4 point plan as follows:

1.  Punish anyone who charged into the refs room.

2.  Ensure Clattenburg isn't out of pocket after effectively being suspended for three weeks.

3.  Chelsea (and every other club) learn lessons that they shouldn't rush into making serious allegations an hour after the game before establishing all the facts.

4.  Everyone move on.

again why do you keep quoting the fa as your defence, but in the john terry case you slated the statement made by the fa...cherry picking? head in sand?

I have never had any problem with Chelea before this ever

BUT

As I said if one of MY employees says he has been racially abused I would first try to establish the facts BEFORE I go to the authorities and certainly wouldnt blindly back the man literally minutes after the so called event

An accusation where he could not even recall what time in them match it happened

An accusation where there was no footage during the game to show ANY grievence toward the ref, not even a "look"

An accusation where players closer to the ref than the one in question didn't hear anything

An accusation where 11 witness statements fail to even produce a case to answer

If you think that is following the "proper" channels then you my friend are deluded and simply blindly backing your club as if it were your only child

I fully understand and applaud club loyalty in some cases but in this it is dreadful

CHELSEA ARE AT FAULT HERE  even if they are not totally to blame and to suggest in some sick way they are some bastion of what is right and correct is fukkin sick

This situation has been embarrassing for Chelsea imo, heads will roll, time too sack Rafa

i don't need a defence mate. cos i've done ferk all wrong.

i'm quoting the fa because they're the regulatory body.

what are you little mob quoting to back up your various prejudices?

is it true rafas been sacked already?

I love it how they use these racism claims. Mikel carries on - clutterbuck suspended for umpteen games.  Spoilt bad loser carried on playing, with the rest of the bad losers - justice - don't make me weep.
Talk about playing the race card.
Will they also be charged with threatening the referee (if that is what happened)
I want to see some balance here.

Your use of the word "mob" suggests everyone is ganging up on you or Chelsea

It is your ignorance in refusiong to see what is right and what is just rhetoric and words

again why didnt you take the fa at face value over john terry, i recall you were kicking and screaming and in meltdown with them over that

see once again edward puts up a false premise  to knock it down in order to give his argument false credibility.

where did i say they're a bastion of what is right?

calm down and consider two things.

they got in an outside firm in order to distance themselves from any bias.

the fa found they acted properly.

but just keep spouting your prejudices.

still cant answer my question? why the double standards?

anyway i'm off to watch the football now.

i'll leave you little mob to carry on with your prejudicial seething.

I'm done

There is a saying "you can't educate Pork" and that applies here.

I hope Chelsea get fukkin hammered over this disgusting accusation

A racist capt and now a club falsely accusing an innocent man of the same thing out of malice / stupidity or any combination of the two

Football should rightly hate what they have become and any apologist for them ( you )

really should have investigated this fully before taking it further,basic stuff in any complaint.
Trouble is in this case it involved a football club that recently has stooped lower and lower,and it seems is run by people that just dont care and think they can behave as they want.

mexicano 22 Nov 12 19:24 Joined: 13 Jan 02 | Topic/replies: 7,495 | Blogger: mexicano's blog
The contents of this post have been hidden for this blocked user: mexicano.
You can manage your blocked users list     here .
Rate reply:
| report


You can join ROy on the too dumb to exchange with list what a clueless mug

lol prejudice? it must run through that club of yours, talk about paranoid

oh dear woe is me

i will not be able to have any informed debate with the prejudicial edward.

head in the sand?

or is it put your fingers in your ears and go "na na na na na"?

erm dont think he can see u mate

wasn't for his consumption.

I thought she was going to watch footie

No doubt i am getting some clog but I am not Dr Doolittle so cant talk to dumb animals

not much debate [and any that was was rather ill informed].

but lots of abuse.

and he blocked me

i picture him as a child , fingers in his ears and singing

pathetic.

"Que"Go and watch football you soppy git or re runs of Love Thy Neighbour , that should be right up your strasa

Benitez will be sweating over this news. He will be thinking someone is gonna have their hand in his compensation fund pie.

Are you lot aware that mr mikel apparently went berserk after the west brim game yet again   Like I said only JT attempts to stand up to him he's one angry guy.   Allegedly

Clattenburg Soccer: £293.33 Total P&L:  £293.33

chelsea make me fookin sick - they want a proper arse*olin for this.

Have just read the b*llshit statement from the FA and nothing will be happening as a consequence of these false allegations - they should be throwing the fookin lot as these b*stards for trying to wreck a good refs career.

Allegations made in "good faith" my ar*e - get some fookin b*llox FA and deal with this tw*ts.

should be given chelskis next big game and send six of the coonts off and award 8 penalties for opposing team.

as i said earlier i doubt chelsea will get the benefit of the doubt in any game for some time to come

It is so much about making lots of noise to cover up other shortcomings!!!  They did, and got away with it for a while.  Still managed to hurl loads of rubbish at a ref and threaten him in his dressing room.  I await justice.  I may be waiting a long time.

I would first try to establish the facts BEFORE I go to the authorities and certainly wouldnt blindly back the man literally minutes after the so called event


The FA asked Chelsea on Monday if they want it investigated, it took them till Wednesday to say YES.
In the interim juan mata decided to drop his claim.Mikel presumably wanted to press on.
48 hours is not literally minutes. If they were "blindly" backing their players I am sure Mata would have persevered.

Since Chelsea could not interview the four officials or examine all TV footage, how could they "establish the facts"?

That is the FAs job. They have done this, and made their ruling.
Mikel now faces the consequences for his behaviour in the official's room.

as i said earlier i doubt chelsea will get the benefit of the doubt in any game for some time to come



are you saying refs cheat, or would bear a grudge ???

From the Official FA statement on the matter:

"The FA is satisfied that the allegation against Mark Clattenburg by Ramires was made in good faith. It is entirely possible for a witness to be genuinely mistaken and convincing in his belief.

In this case, the player and club were correct in reporting the matter to The FA and it was appropriate and proper for such an allegation to be thoroughly investigated."

http://www.thefa.com/News/governance/2012/nov/statement-mark-clattenburg.aspx