|
By:
Newcastle have a good side out imo, Well capable of getting a result..If they getting going !!
|
|
By:
2-0 Brugges :)
|
|
By:
but they are a goal down....
|
|
By:
but they are a goal down....
|
|
By:
I traded out of Anzhi after 20 minutes due to their lack of interest
|
|
By:
So your main hypothesis is that when the market moves against your view of things, a fix is in place, correct? Weak argument.
|
|
By:
Wish I had have stuck with them now
|
|
By:
2-0
, Well it is safe to say they aren't much ''team work'' going on the in the newcastle side tonight haha...Oh well nice one Loaded -( In your acca ) |
|
By:
aah ****
|
|
By:
Hypothesis isn't an argument. Get an education then we'll interchange views.
|
|
By:
if liverpool ever get 3 goals up in any match this slow passing game will look really good.
|
|
By:
The Liverpool c*ck-sucking by the commentators is grating. Eleven lads from this thread would of limited Anzhi to 1-0. Even without Brad Jones
![]() |
|
By:
Your hypothesis is based in weak argumentation or better word reasoning. Simple as that.
|
|
By:
I normally stick to backing home teams and laying away teams in accas, it was that stupid thread from a Brugges fan that swung me.
|
|
By:
didnt Birmingham pull one out of the fire at Brugge not too long ago? Seem to remember it so I must have lost some dough on it
![]() |
|
By:
Ah right just read that thread loaded
..Unlucky least you know you where right in your prediction good spot from yuorself ...I personally was going to stay away from that game as I just good not call it !! |
|
By:
yourself*
|
|
By:
Watch the game agaz and if you're going to lie about what people have said probably not too clever to do it on that very thread.
|
|
By:
How shiite are Liverpool by the way. Anzhi have been forced to win
![]() |
|
By:
Brugge are awful at the back so I wouldn't rule out a Newcastle comeback in that one.
|
|
By:
, Yeah mover I think they won 1-0 or 2-1 away to the brugge last year when they qualified dur to beating the gooners in final of carling cup ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
due*
|
|
By:
wrong option everytime anz
|
|
By:
RMB, science doesn't work by forming hypothesis on random. You review literature find something interesting and build a case for a possible hypothesis. Your 'hypothesis' is a wild guess based on conspiracy theory loony logic. "The market is moving, FIXXXXXXXXXXXXXX!!!"
|
|
By:
You guys still debating
![]() |
|
By:
even calling a bet or a no-bet in this case a hypothesis is an insult to science
|
|
By:
I had 40/1 for anzhi to be winning half time and liverpool full time and although the half time was right, liverpool just don't look like scoring one never mind two.
|
|
By:
I shouldn't entertain liars, damn me.
![]() |
|
By:
Suso has such quick feet, think behind the striker is his position.
|
|
By:
gone over 1.5 on this
|
|
By:
numpty
|
|
By:
Two big chances at both ends. Much more entertaining match now.
|
|
By:
Traore
![]() ![]() ...What a muppett that guy is...![]() |
|
By:
he is fkin awful with his head or feet!
|
|
By:
was easier to score
|
|
By:
both these teams score more than 1/3 of their goals in the last 15 in this comp
|
|
By:
how can beglin talk up this w@nk liverpool performance
|
|
By:
Late goal liverpool please
|
|
By:
Can see another goal here, a Liverpool equaliser wouldn't be a shock.
|