Football
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Defo value that
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 104
|
By:
I agree
|
|
By:
11/10 certainly was
 |
|
By:
Seems like good value for tonight.
Better than man u at 2.26 who are away and relativly safe in their group. IMO |
|
By:
I am sure there are many bets at 2.04 than Backing Chelsea. They are playing against one of the best counter attack teams.
Personally, I laid Chelsea at 1.97 and that's an excellent bet. GL all. |
|
By:
Good luck but obviously I hope you lose
 |
|
By:
 |
|
By:
pp 1.97 will look outstanding value when the away team take the lead
|
|
By:
chelsea had 59% possesion in the previous tie, surely if they have the same or more they should win. Its a game they need to win, whereas a draw would suit shaktar. home win for me.
|
|
By:
One to avoid i think. Shakhtar were the better side away to Juve and murdered chelsea in Ukraine. More than capable of getting a result here and Chelsea aren't exactly solid at the back right now.
|
|
By:
Shaktar has one of the best managers in the world. He managed an average Turkish side who played Chelsea in Champions League during 2003.
A friend recommended me so I backed Besiktas and a Draw at bookies (wasn't member to BF then). Chelsea lost 2-0 and made a good profit. I have been backing his teams since. |
|
By:
Well seen as someone has taken 1.97, then 2.04 is value. At least it beats their bet.
|
|
By:
Chelsea then beat same manager 2-0 away like for like
Not sure if that evens things out, but not sure what your point was. Are you saying 2.04 is value for layers? |
|
By:
Laying Chelsea is a value bet at 2.04 - True price should be around 2.8 imho.
Good luck backers and layers |
|
By:
I've started following @the_drawcast on twitter and he's been unbelievably good at picking draws. He's got Chelsea as his pick tonight...lump on!
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
bill bets at 1.97
ben bets at 2.04 ben gets more for his bet. |
|
By:
brooxy
07 Nov 12 15:43 Joined: 04 Oct 10 | Topic/replies: 11 | Blogger: brooxy's blog I've started following @the_drawcast on twitter and he's been unbelievably good at picking draws. He's got Chelsea as his pick tonight...lump on! Thinly veiled 'I am @the_drawcast....please follow me' post imo |
|
By:
Chel$ki / Manyoo double at 4's - i hope my faith is not misguided
 |
|
By:
bill paid £315 for his Ugg boots
ben paid £275 for his Ugg boots ben thinks he got a bargain |
|
By:
@chomper Thanks. Do you consider 2.04 is value just because bill gets @1.97? I should think about it, someone have to lose eventually because of the 5% comm.
|
|
By:
not what was saying was just being pithy about 2.04 being better than 1.97.
I appreciate not everyone is keen on Uggs |
|
By:
2.04 or 1.97, what is the obsession with betting against a team that doesn't know how to lose?
how do you see tonight's game unfolding? |
|
By:
Chelsea all the way for me.
3-1 is my prediction. good luck |
|
By:
Shakhtar are unbeaten in a competitive game this calendar year and a draw for them tonight is perfectly satisfactory. The same can't be said of their opponents who either do it tonight or they have to do it in two weeks time in Turin. Lucescu can wait and wait and wait, di Matteo has to make something happen.
In the week-end's league game Lucescu made a triple substitution in the 59th minute. He brought on his Brazilian triumvirate: Adriano, Willian and Teixeira. That's the equivalent of a racecourse gallop. He's a slick manager with a team ticking over like a well-oiled machine. How you can predict a 3-1 score-line is beyond me and I don't understand this compulsion to "back the Brits" at any price. |
|
By:
Hippie, read up my friend...they are coming to the home of the european champions and will be mauled out of sight.
Chelsea are fantastic. |
|
By:
so we dismiss the foreigners out of hand?
|
|
By:
They won't like it tonight. Freezing cold and hostile crowd. Most of these will not have played in such conditions and will have leggings etc
JT will thunder one in from a corner as they won't want it. Thats a nap. |
|
By:
Roy clearly on a wind up here
|
|
By:
Good work Roy!
|
|
By:
I thought Gary Neville's assessment at the weekend was interesting. It showed that Chelsea's 4 main players had each played on average 7 hours more football than United's or City's. He suggested that this may have had an effect on the clubs performances at home to United and away at Swansea. This combined with them playing a team that haven't been beaten since the wheel was invented is enough to put me off backing Chelsea.
|
|
By:
Jeez - sounds like Chelsea will lose this 0-7.
|
|
By:
It's a phucking good job that football is played on the pitch and not in the newspapers.
|
|
By:
If,and it probably won't happen,Chelsea pair G Cahill with J Terry as centre backs,and replaceJ O Mikel with D Luiz as the holding midfielder,then no problems envisaged.
|
|
By:
what's the newspapers got to do with?
It's because of the newspapers (and other media) that firms get away with offering a risible even money. |
|
By:
Bertend playing, No cole
 ...Injured ??? |
|
By:
chelsea 2.12?
|
|
By:
Can go either way I reckon. BTTS for me as the main bet, small bet on over 2.5
|
|
By:
WTF is going on with this market. Chelsea should be 1.6, not 2.2
|