|
By:
Perhaps they should just toss a coin.
|
|
By:
I have a great idea, Play extra time but without goalkeepers and first goal wins.
|
|
By:
Play extra time without a ball.
|
|
By:
Legalize the offside rule at extra time...
|
|
By:
loui 26 May 12 14:28 Joined: 30 Mar 03 | Topic/replies: 1,715 | Blogger: loui's blog in the states in the 70,s they used to have a 35 yard run up, one on one player vs keeper. was more emphasis on skill and finishing. goalie could come off his line too. so better test than pens. was entertaining as well. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpAo9c705RE&t=132s Check it out. The first fella who takes it looks like an 1970´s version of Fernando Torres ha ha. |
|
By:
Sepp is sitting in front of the TV with his trousers around his ankles loving this Sheff U v huddersfield game
![]() |
|
By:
Why did golden goal get scrapped anyway?
|
|
By:
extra time the managers have to go in goal
|
|
By:
Same reason he silver goal got scrapped..wikipedia
Silver goal In the 2002 season UEFA introduced a new rule, the silver goal, to decide a competitive match. In extra time the team leading after the first fifteen minute half would win, but the game would no longer stop the instant a team scored. Competitions that operated extra time would be able to decide whether to use the golden goal, the silver goal, or neither procedure during extra time. The only major competitive match to be decided by a silver goal was the semi-final match of Euro 2004 between Greece and the Czech Republic, when Traianos Dellas scored for Greece after a corner kick in the last two seconds of the first period of extra time. This was also the last ever professional silver goal. [edit] Abolition in football The golden goal rule was introduced to stimulate offensive flair and to effectively reduce the number of penalty shootouts. However, it was widely thought[by whom?] that golden goal rules encouraged teams to play more defensively to safeguard against a loss. Teams often placed more emphasis on not conceding a goal rather than scoring a goal, and many golden-goal extra time periods remained scoreless.[citation needed] The silver goal also failed to please the IFAB, as it denied the losing team the chance of saving the match simply by virtue of when the goal is scored. The Euro 2004 semi-final best illustrated the point; if the Greek goal had been scored 15 seconds later, that is immediately after the extra-time interval (instead of the last two seconds of the first period of extra time), the Czechs would have had nearly 15 minutes to attempt to score the equalizer. Furthermore, one team could benefit unfairly if conditions, such as a strong wind, favoured attacking in one direction. In February 2004, the IFAB announced that after Euro 2004 in Portugal, both the golden goal and silver goal methods would be removed from the Laws of the Game. The 2006 FIFA World Cup in Germany did not employ the golden goal in the event of a tied match during the knockout stage,[3] but reverted to the previous rules: In the event of a tied game after the original 90 minutes, two 15-minute halves of extra time were played. Then, if a tie remained after the 30 minutes of extra time, the winner was decided by a penalty shootout.[4] |
|
By:
This is the clown (Sepp Blatter, no one on this thread
) that in 2010 was quoted by German magazine Focus as saying: "If there is no winner at the end of 90 minutes of play, we would proceed directly to penalty kicks." Not going to happen but imagine the hilarity of Sepp's massive seethe if England won the Euro's on penalties. I'm not a betting man nor am I a cynic but what are the odds that this is just a tactic to try and deflect importance away from the goal line technology debate after the Euros. |