Football
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Normally don't touch french football but i have choose lyon win & the stream is on betfair so lets discuss...
Show More
because now dijon has scored slightly worrying because as soon as ajaccio hear about this they will really try hard
ajaccio has just came up from the lower league, maybe going back down..
i don't think they can catch psg to get straight into europa group stages.. but they can go out of europa league, so if they care about it they will try & win
2-0 soux now sorry i got the team wrong, so ajaccio now must win or they are down i think
involved them 3 teams but both are winning so they now must win
they are playing with a ball which looks like its from local council estate & been spray painted pink
LAY OF AJACCIO = DEFINITION OF FREE MONEY HERE THE FACT THAT THEY NEED TO WIN MEANS LYON WILL GET MORE SPAPCE AND AJACCIO HAVENT GOT A PRAYER
May 13, 2012 -- 9:01PM, marquinhos wrote:
LAY OF AJACCIO = DEFINITION OF FREE MONEY HERE THE FACT THAT THEY NEED TO WIN MEANS LYON WILL GET MORE SPAPCE AND AJACCIO HAVENT GOT A PRAYER
http://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29116083/santos---guarani-sp-half-time-2-2?sdb=1#flvWelcomeHeader
JUMP ON DUDE.
May 13, 2012 -- 9:01PM, marquinhos wrote:
LAY OF AJACCIO = DEFINITION OF FREE MONEY HERE THE FACT THAT THEY NEED TO WIN MEANS LYON WILL GET MORE SPAPCE AND AJACCIO HAVENT GOT A PRAYER
i backed lyon & first goal pre-kick off thanks dude, just made me believe in lyon more that they will win
have you seen the live stream is it me on does the 0-0 look weird, well the 0 on ajaccio
RFLMFAO AT AJACCIO PRICE SOMETIMES I OVERESTIMATE YOU MUGS
IF ANYTHING HAVING 10 MAKES IT MORE LIKELY THAT LYON WONT LOSE AS THEY WILL TAKE THE POINT
SINCE WHEN IS HAVING 10 MEN EVEN A DISADVANTAGE? WAKE UP MUGATRONS LYON AINT GONNA LOSE THIS
hope not, hope lyon win, they have won many games with ten men
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539