Niel lennon

Agreed , Straight over to the ref spouting his bile as usual

I hope this is the last time i hear these two mentioned in the same sentence

Thanks Neil

here we go with someone trying to keep alive the nonsense about a so called signing policy.  rangers had a catholic in the team before celtic even formed so please stop trying to deflect from your teams shortcomings by turning it around to how its big bad rangers fault that your team are bottle merchants. your manager is a disgrace and your lies will never change that.

dg123. Souness has well documented the signing policy which was in existence. I was making the point that some people go on about saving a wonderful instituition like Rangers as if they are the innocent ones in their financial dealings. If you want to believe that the same wonderful institution did not practise such a policy have many happy days in la la land.

very true , but it kinda blows the masonic  ref conspiracy theory

If my mother was murdered today and by pure coincidence I unwittingly accidentally ran over the murderer's mother the same day would that mean my mother was not murdered?

Why was one given and not the other ?  In my humble opinion the Celtic claim was a more blatant penalty than the Hearts one as Ledley was so close he could not have avoided the ball striking him on the arm. In other words the ref gave a dubious penallty whilst denying a blatant one.

Whilst I would say neither was a penalty in terms of the 'deliberate hand ball' rule being applied as opposed to having your hands out like a scarecrow whilst trying to block a goal bound shot like the Celtic defender did. Webster had his hands over his chest and the shot was never goal bound. Clearly the ref made a mistake like the linesman did at the offside. It is hard to tell in the heat of the moment whether a player deliberately put his hand out or didn't, just like it is to tell if a player is offside.

Once again the usual ****s in Scotland havin a go at Neil LENNON.  I wonder why?  Is he not allowed to have a say to the ref when his team have just been knocked out of the semi-final of the cup.  I don't see him punching the ref, sending him bombs, etc.  Get into the fooking real world u shower of BIGOTS who live in the most bigotted country in Western Europe

i must have missed all the catholic rangers players and employees from the 1900s until souness signed

John Spencer chelsea everton and Rangers is and was a CATHOLIC who was at Ibrox before SOUNESS

John Spencer chelsea everton and Rangers is and was a CATHOLIC who was at Ibrox before SOUNESS

Another proof by counterexample.

turn left clyde

PERSONALLY I DON'T SEE ANYTHING WRONG WITH A MANAGER LOSING THE PLOT TO A POINT WHEN DECISIONS GO AGAINST THEM IT SEEMS PERFECTLY NATURAL TO ME TO HATE LOSING.

THE MORE OBVIOUS QUESTION IS THAT RATHER THAN BEING THE 'BLESSED ONE' IT LOOKS TO ME THAT LENNON HAS NO IDEA WHAT HE IS DOING.

AS I'VE SAID BEFORE THE EXCELLENT SIGNINGS BROUGHT TO THE CLUB WILL HAVE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH HIM, HIS SQUAD IS MILES BETTER IN QUALITY THAN EVERYONE ELSE BUT HE SEEMS TO HAVE NO CLUE WHAT TO DO TACTICALLY AND WITH PERSONNEL ON THE PARK. 90% OF THE TIME BECAUSE OF THE DISPARITY IN QUALITY WITH THE OPPOSITION THIS PROVES IRRELEVANT BUT WHEN IT DOES MATTER HE SEEMS TO COME UP SHORT NEARLY EVERY TIME.

HE DIDN'T HELP HIMSELF BRINGING HIS EQUALLY INEXPERIENCED MATES AS HIS BACKROOM TEAM BUT BECAUSE OF HIS 'CELTIC MINDEDNESS' WHATEVER THAT IS HE APPEARS TO BE IMMUNE FROM CRITICISM OF HIS MANAGERIAL ABILITIES.

another vile little sectarian thread.......pathetic.....

dg123...I bow to your superior knowledge. Rangers never had a policy of not signing catholics and the fact that Souness had to say he would only take the job if such a policy was ended does not mean a thing. Loke you I will leave it at that as when someone is in complete denial it can be most dangerous to try and reason with him.

Loke = Like

Richters playing the usual victim card. Is it cos I is black???