Man City v Chelsea,city approx evens

Woeful stuff from both teams in th final third

going to back Chelsea :)

Villareal v Real on Sky Sports 3 if you want to watch a real football match

Or the apprentice on BBC 1 MB!

Got a sweepstake at work on it, I have someone called Laura Hogg!

Why is betfair suspending when a corner gets crossed in?

Suspend employee woke up from his power nap.

Because BF employ idiots.

0-0 backers getting a good run for their money here!

0-1 Chelsea is a good shout because they may provide the sucker punch on the counter.

3 out of 4 PL matches tonight are 0-0....quality league

goals doesn't make a league quality...and I wouldn't call it a suckerpunch stealthgun more like a blow.

and the fourth is 0-1 :-)

why the **** did betfair scoreboard have it as 1-0 to city after the fake suspend!!!!!!

booooooooooom

goal chelsea :-)

2 out of 4 now

GOOOALLLL CHELSEAAAAA

og ?

Mar 21, 2012 -- 10:02PM, stealthgun wrote:

0-1 Chelsea is a good shout because they may provide the sucker punch on the counter.

FFS didn't back it!!!!!!! 8/1 as well!

Zomg

No major surprise

G. Cahil 

AHAHAHAHA

The one and only time I may say this...


CHHHHHHHEEEEELLLLLLLLSSSSSKKKKKKKIIIIII

thank u very much lets all now green up!!!

Barry may have been fouled by Luiz there, but the bloke is about as strong as a 12 yr old girl.

At least Tevez will be motivated (needs to find a new club)

#OnlyChance for the merceneries

I have a small bet on Chelsea...but cant say im delighted about Manure winning the league AGAIN

job done time to green out

Here comes the ugly mutt.

HERE COMES BERNARD MANNING

What's the point of greening out if chelsea score? That's just a mug's game, you'd have been better off just betting on the "chelsea to score next" market, it means you never give away profit in greening as it's settled on the goal.

Let's see the defensive Chelsea of old!

welcome back tevez? LMAO how fickle are the citeh fans.

as an aside,how big is david platts head ? must have its own gravitational pull.

are kompany or lescot on the bench?

LUIZ IS ACTUALLY DEFENDING WELL TONIGHT

MAYBE HE'S FINALLY LEARNING

I've greened out because I think City will score at least one goal, especially now Tevez is on.
I don't bet mug markets like next to score, only idiots bet on that sh!te

high_lander confirms that he don`t win @ betting

Next to score isn't a mug market, it's equivalent to backing a team then greening out after they score, except you get better value for the same bet.

Welcome back Tevez.... hows your handicap?

Chelsea comfortable. City lacking ideas.

dam stoke scored agais Tottenham

Pen

Premier League is fixed, all matches 0-1

Poor decision

ARMS IN THE AIR - PEN

bull

1-1

1-1

Mike Dean in the house

Too close that, too much power, harsh.

ror • March 21, 2012 9:09 PM GMT
What's the point of greening out if chelsea score? That's just a mug's game, you'd have been better off just betting on the "chelsea to score next" market, it means you never give away profit in greening as it's settled on the goal.

PS this makes no sense ror, if you bet chelsea ft then you can still win if City score first, if you bet chels next goal youlose

Just as well I greened out

chelsea play man united and lose out on points because of pens, same story here

same here

Glad I greened

ror has proved himself to be a colossal idiot

Also backed the draw at 3.85, so 1-1 or 1-2 will do nicely. 2-1 = little/no profit.

Tottenham is screwing me arround, wont lose much but why lose :)

loadedgimp: While that's technically true, the little value you get for that (city score, then chelsea overhaul a deficit to win from behind) is so unlikely (about 1 in 40) it's nothing compared to the money you lose by greening after the goal.

Greening is only ever worth it if you red out, or otherwise always try to make value bets. Otherwise it's giving away money for 'peace of mind' which is just a waste and loses to winnings not covering losses.

SURELY ITS ABOUT TIME CECH TOOK THAT HAT OFF

ror • March 21, 2012 9:25 PM GMT
loadedgimp: While that's technically true, the little value you get for that (city score, then chelsea overhaul a deficit to win from behind) is so unlikely (about 1 in 40) it's nothing compared to the money you lose by greening after the goal.

Greening is only ever worth it if you red out, or otherwise always try to make value bets. Otherwise it's giving away money for 'peace of mind' which is just a waste and loses to winnings not covering losses.

your saying that as if the result has already been determined. and that's a pretty broad generalization of saying that each game/match/contest is going to finish the same way with no variables to consider

yesssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

2-1

2-1!!!!! GET THE FOOK IN!

bloody Chelski!!

superbe

could be the goal that wins the title for City.

foooking lucky boys, if they hadn't blasted the ball into essiens arms then this would have been won

Hope you're enjoying this Dawsey

Did Nasri get booked?

city fans enjoyed that

who woulda thunk it? nasri? been shocking all year

razz: most greening is done without much consideration of current odds or watching the game, it's done to get a green screen for nothing but the sake of being green.

If you think that city will score after chelsea, then back the chelsea next goal, then take your profit, then back city next goal! Far far far more profit than backing chelsea then greening out.

city fans enjoyed that

who woulda thunk it? nasri? been shocking all year

Mar 21, 2012 -- 9:40PM, MiltonF wrote:

When it really comes down to it.. desire.. City just don't have it.. tippy tappy back pass tippy tappy back pass.. too late for that karp now..

Lovely assist from Tevez

oh my god i am a united fan but i have a big bet on city and I'm delighted and disgusted with myself at the same time.

there you go, no corner for drogs.  ref definitely on the take

Mar 21, 2012 -- 10:32PM, mistersjmcg wrote:

oh my god i am a united fan but i have a big bet on city and I'm delighted and disgusted with myself at the same time.

You're no Utd fan, I'm sorry

ror, trying to explain value betting to mugs is roughly equivalent to pissing into a gale force wind.

why on earth bother ? just let em keep losing their hard earned..

CAN'T SEE CITY WINNING THE TITLE

HOPEFULLY NOT ANYWAY CAN'T HAVE MONEY WINNING IT

ror if you want to win you will have to learn to treat every football match as an individual event. What happens in other games has nothing to do with this one match, until you learn that you will continue to lose.

I mean, they don`t appreciate the help so fluk em

What have United done the past 10 years though Geeyredosh? Buying Rooney, Ferdinand, Veron etc for huge prices. City have merely caught up in a short space of time.

Mar 21, 2012 -- 10:34PM, Geesyerdosh wrote:

CAN'T SEE CITY WINNING THE TITLEHOPEFULLY NOT ANYWAY CAN'T HAVE MONEY WINNING IT

Agreed! Buying success. Disgusting!

True tucker, although I've constructed a bot that is actually more likely to bet the worse the value is, (it's more likely to back short odds than long odds!), yet the bot keeps winning (assuming stuff finishes as it stands, it's got back city, lay qpr and lay everton right and only back spurs wrong).

GTFI

absolute balls, another pen saves the mancs

NO CITY HAVE TAKEN SPENDING OFF THE SCALE

YOU CAN POINT AT MAN UTD SPENDING THE BIG MONEY ON A FEW PLAYERS BUT CITY HAVE DONE IT WITH A WHOLE SQUAD

ITS JUST TOO MUCH

Mar 21, 2012 -- 10:30PM, ror wrote:

razz: most greening is done without much consideration of current odds or watching the game, it's done to get a green screen for nothing but the sake of being green.If you think that city will score after chelsea, then back the chelsea next goal, then take your profit, then back city next goal! Far far far more profit than backing chelsea then greening out.

most greening? I wouldn't say that, sure a lot does, and you said it's only EVER worth it if you red out, while that's simply not true. I am not talking about this game specifically like you were trying to imply, I haven't even placed a bet on it.
you seem to be saying that greening out is never worth it regardless of the circumstances, surely I have misinterpreted your words?

razz you are wasting your time, ror is one of the biggest mugs I've ever known.

You might as well buy a lottery ticket as back next team to score market... what a mug

I think he doesn't understand the difference between match odds and next goal market.

Mar 21, 2012 -- 10:44PM, loadedgimp wrote:

I think he doesn't understand the difference between match odds and next goal market.

or logic and variables

its like liverpool 2 up and 1.02 to lay but you shouldn't green for the sake of it.  or chelsea at 5/1 then they score but you shouldn't green for the sake of it.

lol http://community.betfair.com/football/go/thread/view/94070/29011881/1.01_in_danger#flvWelcomeHeader
ror should of greened out when he could haha

City 2.0 layers stung there and deservedly so, horrible price to lay.

Yup, they probably decided 11/1 was a value lay too.