Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
LeoOnAHigh
04 Aug 10 14:52
Joined:
Date Joined: 26 Jun 07
| Topic/replies: 15,431 | Blogger: LeoOnAHigh's blog
Trainer has an obscene SR here (think it's over +100 profit), the form of the last race puts it in with a bigger claim here than the odds suggest, and the trainer must know something we don't by putting the visor back on.t

25 win @ 9.00
50 place @ 3.00
Pause Switch to Standard View 3.00 Brighton - Pennfield Pirate
Show More
Loading...
Report cgull August 4, 2010 2:59 PM BST
Would you consider the reapplication of headgear to be a positive, Leo?  In general terms I mean.
Report cgull August 4, 2010 3:00 PM BST
*On a horse that has been beaten while wearing it.
Report LeoOnAHigh August 4, 2010 3:01 PM BST
I think I would yeah because they must have a positive reason for reapplying it surely.

Is that wrong?
Report LeoOnAHigh August 4, 2010 3:03 PM BST
Hopefully they'll run that over 10 or 11 next time.
Report cgull August 4, 2010 3:05 PM BST
There is no right or wrong as such.  It can be a last resort though.  I'd be more interested in a horse that had won in headgear previously, achieving a better level of form than it had shown, and now had it re-applied.
Report cgull August 4, 2010 3:06 PM BST
Or, for example, the offspring of a horse that improved for headgear wearing it for the first time.  A Stravinsky colt for instance.
Report LeoOnAHigh August 4, 2010 3:09 PM BST
They both seem good concepts.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com