why not have 2 refs -i in each half of the pitch?

then they would get even fatter and even slower, lazy cnuts.

Because then managers would moan that 1 ref was giving fouls for an offence that the other wasn't.

why not use video reffing, like rugby. This make more sense than fact a wheel is round.

Also, put a tracking chip in the football so that the balls exact movements and position can be ascertained throughout play.

These ideas aint rocket science. For a league with so much money at stake, i cant for the life of me understand why these have not already being implemented?

Can anyone give sound logical reasons why the above are not used in english football?

why not have 24 refs -i in each half of the pitch?

they'd have to have equal power and that will lead to inevitable embaressing public disagreements. Where as now the ref can know he's just made a total balls up and theres noone official out there who can call him a tlt.

no watts. I can't make heads or tails of it either. no reasonw hy the 4th official can't have a quick look. Give each team 3 calls a match to challange a decision. If the chall is correct then they go back to how many calls they have left. It would also bring an extra advantage of anticipation forthe crowd not knowing what way the callis gonna go.

and i can't see it ruining the flow of a match. refs are happily stoppin play once a minute for perfectly good tackles or netball'esk pushes.

why not have robots monitoring offside positions?

could result in a penalty given in old trafford.