think if you give the benefit of the doubt to the attacking side, then you say he's just about in line and onside.
you can't say he's not interfering though - sticks a leg out at the ball in front of the keeper = interfering.
think if you give the benefit of the doubt to the attacking side, then you say he's just about in line and onside.you can't say he's not interfering though - sticks a leg out at the ball in front of the keeper = interfering.
Papa Smurf bangs on about Redknapp floundering around for a reson to justify the goal then does exactly the same himself to find a reason to disallow it.
It was given. The record books will say 1-0 so get over it.
Papa Smurf bangs on about Redknapp floundering around for a reson to justify the goal then does exactly the same himself to find a reason to disallow it.It was given. The record books will say 1-0 so get over it.
Drogba not interfering? Van Der Saar has to wait to see if Drogba touches the ball by then it is nearly past him
if he was offside why would van de saar have to wait to see if drogba touches the ball
Geesyerdosh 08 Nov 18:13 onside? not to meDrogba not interfering? Van Der Saar has to wait to see if Drogba touches the ball by then it is nearly past him if he was offside why would van de saar have to wait to see if drogba touches the ball