Exchange Games
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
14 Apr 15
12:49
Joined:
Date Joined:
16 Jun 04
They say that time waits for no man.
If time waited from what point in time would it wait?
It wouldn't need a point in time to wait. Because if it
did wait in time there wouldn't be a point in time where
it could wait. So making the point in time when it waited
from pointless.
Time can never wait in time because it is time if it did wait
it wouldn't be time. So if time waited all that would happen
is the length of time would just get larger between the two
points of time and that's where things start to get complicated.
Yep next
If time waited from what point in time would it wait?
It wouldn't need a point in time to wait. Because if it
did wait in time there wouldn't be a point in time where
it could wait. So making the point in time when it waited
from pointless.
Time can never wait in time because it is time if it did wait
it wouldn't be time. So if time waited all that would happen
is the length of time would just get larger between the two
points of time and that's where things start to get complicated.
Yep next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 2
|
By:
So let me quickly wrap this up for you.
Basically in a nut shell you can't put something that isn't there into something that doesn't exist. So time can't go back in time anytime because the time wouldn't be time if at anytime it stopped being time. There would never be a point in time to go back to because of the moment it stops being time. Yep next |
|
By:
It helps if you put the two points together.
They say that time waits for no man. If time waited from what point in time would it wait? It wouldn't need a point in time to wait, because if it did wait in time there wouldn't be a point in time where it could wait. So making the point in time when it waited from pointless. Time can never wait in time because it is time, if it did wait it wouldn't be time. So if time waited all that would happen is the length of time would just get larger between the two points of time and that's where things start to get complicated. So time can't go back in time any time because the time wouldn't be time if at any time it stopped being time. There would never be a point in time to go back to because of the moment it stops being time. That should clear up any confusion in understanding the time travel and time continuum hypothesis which the speed of light combined into both time and speed of structural and non structural space time. Yep next |